Decision-induced focusing in social dilemmas: Give-some, keep-some, take-some, and leave-some dilemmas

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 92-104

  Van Dijk, Eric ^a   Wilke, Henk ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALTRUISM; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; MALE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ADULT; ALTRUISM; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL CONFORMITY;

EID: 0033631342     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.92     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Allison, S. T., McQueen. L. R., & Schaerfl, L. M. (1992). Social decision making processes and the equal partitionment of shared resources. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 23-42.
2. Allison, S. T., & Messick, D. M. (1988). The feature-positive effect, attitude strength, and degree of perceived consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 231-241.
3. Allison, S. T., & Messick, D. M. (1990). Social decision heuristics in the use of shared resources. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 195-204.
4. Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 543-549.
5. Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. E., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 201-234). New York: Academic Press.
6. Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. E. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015-1026.
7. Cook, K. S. (1975). Expectations, evaluations and equity. American Sociological Review, 40, 372-388.
8. Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193.
9. Della Fave, L. R. (1980). The meek shall inherit the earth: Self-evaluation and the legitimacy of stratification. American Sociological Review, 45, 955-971.
10. Fazio, R. H., Sherman, S. J., & Herr, P. M. (1982). The feature-positive effect in the self-perception process: Does not doing matter as much as doing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 404-411.
11. Fleishman, J. A. (1988). The effects of decision framing and others' behavior on cooperation in a social dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 32, 162-180.
12. Harrod, W. J. (1980). Expectations from unequal rewards. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 955-971.
13. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrics, 47, 263-291.
14. Kerr, N. L. (1995). Norms in social dilemmas. In D. Schroeder (Ed.), Social dilemmas: Perspectives on individuals and groups (pp. 31-47). Westport, CT: Praeger.
15. Komorita, S. S., & Carnevale, P. (1992). Motivational arousal vs. decision framing in social dilemmas. In W. B. G. Liebrand, D. M. Messick, & H. A. M. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 209-223). New York: Pergamon Press.
16. Komorita, S. S., & Parks, C. D. (1995). Interpersonal relations: Mixed-motive interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 183-207.
17. Larrick, R. P., & Blount, S. (1997). The claiming effect: Why players are more generous in social dilemmas than in ultimatum games. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 810-825.
18. Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1993). Focusing in reasoning and decision making. Cognition, 49, 37-66.
19. Marwell, G., & Ames, R. E. (1979). Experiments on the provision of public goods, I: Resources, interest, group size, and the free-rider problem. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 1335-1360.
20. McGuire, W. J., & McGuire, C. V. (1991). The content, structure, and operation of thought systems. In R. S. Wyer, Jr., & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Advances in social cognition: Vol. 4. The content, structure, and operation of thought systems (pp. 1-78). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Messick, D. M. (1993). Equality as a decision heuristic. In B. A. Mellers & J. Baron (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on justice: Theory and applications (pp. 11-31). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
22. Messick, D. M., Allison, S. T., & Samuelson, C. D. (1988). Framing and communication effects on group members' responses to environmental and social uncertainty. In S. Maital (Ed.), Applied behavioral economics (Vol. 2, pp. 677-700). New York: New York University Press.
23. Messick, D. M., & Brewer, M. B. (1983). Solving social dilemmas: A review. In L. Wheeler & P. Shaver (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 11-44). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24. Moore, D. (1991). Entitlement and justice evaluations: Who should get more, and why. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 208-223.
25. Pruitt, D. G., & Carnevale, P. J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
26. Rapoport, A. (1988). Provision of step-level goods: Effects of inequality in resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 54, 432-440.
27. Rapoport, A., & Suleiman, R. (1993). Incremental contribution in step-level public goods games with asymmetric players. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 171-194.
28. Reno, R. R., Cialdini, R. B., & Kallgren, C. A. (1993). The transsituational influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology; 64, 104-112.
29. Rutte, C. G., Wilke, H. A. M., & Messick, D. M. (1987). The effects of framing social dilemmas as give-some or take-some games. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 103-108.
30. Samuelson, C. D., & Allison, S. T. (1994). Cognitive factors affecting the use of social decision heuristics in resource-sharing tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 1-27.
31. Samuelson, C. D., & Messick, D. M. (1986). Inequities in access to and use of shared resources in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 960-967.
32. Schwartz-Shea, P., & Simmons, R. T. (1995). Social dilemmas and perceptions: Experiments on framing and inconsequentiality. In D. Schroeder (Ed.), Social dilemmas: Perspectives on individuals and groups (pp. 87-103). Westport, CT: Praeger.
33. van Dijk, E., & Grodzka, M. (1992). The influence of endowments asymmetry and information level on the contribution to a public step good. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13, 329-342.
34. van Dijk, E., & Wilke, H. (1993). Differential interests, equity, and public good provision. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 1-16.
35. van Dijk, E., & Wilke, H. (1994). Asymmetry of wealth and public good provision. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 352-359.
36. van Dijk, E., & Wilke, H. (1995). Coordination rules in asymmetric social dilemmas: A comparison between public good dilemmas and resource dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 1-27.
37. van Dijk, E., & Wilke, H. (1996). Tacit coordination and fairness judgments in social dilemmas. In W. B. G. Liebrand & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Frontiers in social dilemma research (pp. 117-134). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
38. van Dijk, E., & Wilke, H. (1997). Is it mine or is it ours? Framing property rights and decision making in social dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71, 195-209.
39. van Dijk, E., Wilke, H., Wilke, M., & Metman, L. (1999). What information do we use in social dilemmas? Environmental uncertainty and the employment of coordination rules. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 109-135.
40. van Lange, P. A. M., Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1992). Introduction and literature review. In W. B. G. Liebrand, D. M. Messick, & H. A. M. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 3-28). New York: Pergamon Press.
41. van Lange, P. A. M., & Messick, D. M. (1996). Psychological processes underlying cooperation in social dilemmas. In W. Gasparski, M. Mlicki, & B. Banathy (Eds.), Social agency: Dilemmas and educational praxiology (Vol. 4, pp. 93-112). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
42. Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
43. Wit, A. P., Wilke, H. A. M., & Oppewal, H. (1992). Fairness in asymmetric social dilemmas. In W. B. G. Liebrand, D. M. Messick, & H. A. M. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 183-197). New York: Pergamon Press.