Generative linguistics within the cognitive neuroscience of language

Linguistic Review

Volumn 22, Issue 2-4, 2005, Pages 429-445

  Marantz, Alec ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 29144487094     PISSN: 01676318     EISSN: 16133676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.429     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Beretta, Alan, Robert Fiorentine, and David Poeppel (2005). The effects of homonymy and polysemy on lexical access: An MEG study. Cognitive Brain Research 24 (1): 57-65.
2. Chomsky, Noam (2001). Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1-52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
3. _ (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step, Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka (eds.), 89-155. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
4. Crain, Stephen, and Diane Lillo-Martin (1999). An Introduction to Linguistic Theory and Language Acquisition, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
5. Egan, Andy (2004). Pretense for the complete idiom. Ms., Australian National University, Canberra.
6. Fodor, Jerry A., Thomas G. Bever, and Merrill F. Garrett (1974). The Psychology of Language. New York: McGraw Hill.
7. Jackendoff, Ray (2002). Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Katz, Jerrold J. (1981). Language and Other Abstract Objects. New Jersey: Rowman and Little-field.
9. McGinnis, Martha (2002). On the systematic aspect of idioms. Linguistic Inquiry 33 (4):665-672.
10. Machery, Edouard, Ron Mallon, Shaun Nichols, and Stephen P. Stich (2004). Semantics, cross-cultural style. Cognition 92 (3): B1-B12.
11. Phillips, Colin and Ellen Lau (2004). Foundational issues [Review article: Jackendoff (2002), Foundations of Language.] Journal of Linguistics 40: 571-591.
12. Phillips, Colin, Nina Kazanina, and Shani Abada (2005). ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies. Cognitive Brain Research 22 (3): 407-428.
13. Poeppel, David and David Embick (in press). Defining the relation between linguistics and neuroscience. In Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones, Anne Cutler (ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Pylkkänen, Liina, Sophie Feintuch, Emily Hopkins, Alec Marantz (2004). Neural correlates of the effects of morphological family frequency and family size: an MEG study. Cognition 91 (3): B35-B45.
15. Pylkkänen, Liina and Alec Marantz (2003). Tracking the time course of word recognition with MEG. Trends in Cognitive. Sciences 7: 187-189.
16. Pylkkänen, Liina, Rodolfo Llinás, and Gregory Murphy (in press). Representation of polysemy: MEG evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
17. Schütze, Carson (1996). The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgements and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.