Extensive long-distance pollen dispersal in a fragmented landscape maintains genetic diversity in white spruce

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 98, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 640-645

  O'Connell, Lisa M ^a   Mosseler, Alex ^b   Rajora, Om P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

^b LAURENTIAN FORESTRY CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLOENZYME;

AGRICULTURE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CANADA; CLIMATE; FERTILIZATION; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; INBREEDING; LANDSCAPE; NONHUMAN; PLANT SEED; POLLEN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE GENETICS; TREE; WHITE SPRUCE;

ECOSYSTEM; GENE FLOW; GENOTYPE; ISOENZYMES; ONTARIO; PICEA; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION; VARIATION (GENETICS);

CONIFEROPHYTA; PICEA GLAUCA;

EID: 37549043819     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: 14657333     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esm089     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adams WT. 1992. Gene dispersal within forest tree populations. New For. 6:217-240.
2. Adams WT, Birkes DS. 1991. Estimating mating patterns in forest tree populations. In: Fineschi S, Malvotti ME, Cannata F, Hattemer HH, editors. Biochemical markers in the population genetics of forest trees. The Hague (The Netherlands): APB Academic Publishing. p. 157-172.
3. Adams WT, Hipkins V, Burczyk J, Randall W. 1997. Pollen contamination trends in a maturing Douglas-fir seed orchard. Can J For Res. 27:131-134.
4. Bacles CFE, Burczyk J, Lowe AJ, Ennos RA. 2005. Historical and contemporary mating patterns in remnant populations of the forest tree Fraxinus excelsior L. Evolution. 59:979-990.
5. Burczyk J, Adams WT, Moran GF, Griffins AR. 2002. Complex patterns of mating revealed in a Eucalyptus regnans seed orchard using allozyme markers and the neighborhood model. Mol Ecol. 11:2379-2391.
6. Burczyk J, Adams WT, Shimizu JY. 1996. Mating patterns and pollen dispersal in a natural knobcone pine (Pinus attenuata Lemmon.) stand. Heredity. 77:251-260.
7. Burczyk J, Chybicki IJ. 2004. Cautions on direct gene flow estimation in plant populations. Evolution. 58:956-963.
8. Burczyk J, DiFazio SP, Adams WT. 2004. Gene flow in forest trees: how far do genes really travel? For Genet. 11:179-192.
9. Chase MR, Moller C, Kesseli R, Bawa KS. 1996. Distant gene flow in tropical trees. Nature. 383:398-399.
10. Critchfield WB. 1984. Impact of the Pleistocene on the genetic structure of North American conifers. In: Lanner RM, editor. Proceedings of the 8th North American Forest Biology Workshop. Logan (UT): Department of Forest Resources, Utah State University. p. 70-117.
11. Denti D, Schoen DJ. 1988. Self-fertilization rates in white spruce: effect of pollen and seed production. J Hered. 79:284-288.
12. Dyer RJ, Sork VL. 2001. Pollen pool heterogeneity in shortleaf pine, Pinus echinata mill. Mol Ecol. 10:859-866.
13. Godt MJW, Hamrick JL, Edwards-Burke MA, Williams JH. 2001. Comparisons of genetic diversity in white spruce (Picea glauca) and jack pine (Pinus banksiana) seed orchards with natural populations. Can J For Res. 31:943-949.
14. Hamilton MB. 1999. Tropical tree gene flow and seed dispersal. Nature. 401:129-130.
15. Hamrick JL. 2004. Response of forest trees to global environmental changes. For Ecol Manag. 197:323-335.
16. Hamrick JL, Godt MJW. 1996. Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 351:1291-1298.
17. Hamrick JL, Godt MJW, Sherman-Broyles SL. 1992. Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plants species. New For. 6:95-124.
18. Harju AM, Nikkanen T. 1996. Reproductive success of orchard and non-orchard pollens during different stages of pollen shedding in a Scots pine seed orchard. Can J For Res. 26:1096-1102.
19. Jamieson A. 1994. The effectiveness of using co-dominant polymorphic allelic series for (1) checking pedigrees and (2) distinguishing full-sib pair members. Anim Genet. 25:37-44.
20. Liepelt S, Bialozyt R, Ziegenhagen B. 2002. Wind-dispersed pollen mediates postglacial gene flow among refugia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:14590-14594.
21. Nason JD, Hamrick JL. 1997. Reproductive and genetic consequences of forest fragmentation: two case studies of Neotropical canopy trees. J Hered. 88:264-276.
22. Nienstaedt H, Zasada JC. 1990. Picea glauca (Moench) Voss. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH, editors. Silvics of North America. Volume 1. Conifers. Agricultural handbook 654. Washington (DC): Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. p. 204-226.
23. O'Connell LM, Mosseler A, Rajora OP. 2006a. Impacts of forest fragmentation on the mating system and genetic diversity of white spruce (Picea glauca) at the landscape level. Heredity. 97:418-426.
24. O'Connell LM, Mosseler A, Rajora OP. 2006b. Impacts of forest fragmentation on the reproductive success of white spruce (Picea glauca). Can J Bot. 84:956-965.
25. Paule L, Lindgren D, Yazdani R. 1993. Allozyme frequencies, outcrossing rate and pollen contamination in Picea abies orchards. Scand J For Res. 8:8-17.
26. Ritland K. 2002. Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independant loci. Heredity. 88:221-228.
27. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Gil L. 2004. Patterns of pollen dispersal in a small population of Pinus sylvestris L. revealed by total-exclusion paternity analysis. Heredity. 94:13-22.
28. Schuster WSF, Mitton JB. 2000. Paternity and gene dispersal in limber pine (Pinus flexilis James). Heredity. 84:348-361.
29. Smouse PE, Sork VL. 2004. Measuring pollen flow in forest trees: a comparison of alternative approaches. For Ecol Manag. 197:21-38.
30. White GM, Boshier DH, Powell W. 2002. Increased pollen flow counteracts fragmentation in a tropical dry forest: an example from Swietenia humilis Zuccarini. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:2038-2042.
31. Wright S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics. 16:97-159.
32. Xie CY, Knowles P. 1994. Mating system and effective pollen immigration in a Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst) plantation. Silvae Genet. 43:48-52.
33. Young A, Boyle T, Brown T. 1996. The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol Evol. 11:413-418.