Analysis of rare amino acid replacements supports the coelomata clade

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 24, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 2594-2597

  Rogozin, Igor B ^a   Wolf, Yuri I ^a   Carmel, Liran ^a   Koonin, Eugene V ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Cladistics; Coelomata; Ecdysozoa; Phylogenetic analysis; Rare genomic changes

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; CLADISTICS; COELOMATA CLADE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HOMOPLASY; NEMATOSTELLA VECTENSIS; NONHUMAN; SEA ANEMONE; TAXON;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ANIMALS; CHORDATA; HUMANS; PHYLOGENY;

ACTINIARIA; ANIMALIA; BILATERIA; COELOMATA; ECDYSOZOA; NEMATOSTELLA VECTENSIS;

EID: 37549040975     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msm218     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Adoutte A, Balavoine G, Lartillot N, Lespinet O, Prud'homme B, de Rosa R. 2000. The new animal phylogeny: reliability and implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97:4453-4456.
2. Aguinaldo AM, Turbeville JM, Linford LS, Rivera MC, Garey JR, Raff RA, Lake JA. 1997. Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals. Nature. 387:489-493.
3. Blair JE, Ikeo K, Gojobori T, Hedges SB. 2002. The evolutionary position of nematodes. BMC Evol Biol. 2:7.
4. Copley RR, Aloy P, Russell RB, Telford MJ. 2004. Systematic searches for molecular synapomorphies in model metazoan genomes give some support for Ecdysozoa after accounting for the idiosyncrasies of Caenorhabditis elegans. Evol Dev. 6:164-169.
5. Dopazo H, Dopazo J. 2005. Genome-scale evidence of the nematode-arthropod clade. Genome Biol. 6:R41.
6. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1792-1797.
7. Irimia M, Maeso I, Penny D, Garcia-Fernandez J, Roy SW. 2007. Rare coding sequence changes are consistent with Ecdysozoa, not Coelomata. Mol Biol Evol. 24:1604-1607.
8. Koonin EV, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, et al. (18 co-authors). 2004. A comprehensive evolutionary classification of proteins encoded in complete eukaryotic genomes. Genome Biol. 5:R7.
9. Mushegian AR, Garey JR, Martin J, Liu LX. 1998. Large-scale taxonomic profiling of eukaryotic model organisms: a comparison of orthologous proteins encoded by the human, fly, nematode, and yeast genomes. Genome Res. 8:590-598.
10. Nei M, Kumar S. 2001. Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Oxford: Oxford University.
11. Philip GK, Creevey CJ, McInerney JO. 2005. The Opisthokonta and the Ecdysozoa may not be clades: stronger support for the grouping of plant and animal than for animal and fungi and stronger support for the Coelomata than Ecdysozoa. Mol Biol Evol. 22:1175-1184.
12. Philippe H, Lartillot N, Brinkmann H. 2005. Multigene analyses of bilaterian animals corroborate the monophyly of Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa and Protostomia. Mol Biol Evol. 22:1246-1253.
13. Rogozin IB, Wolf YI, Carmel L, Koonin EV. 2007. Ecdysozoan clade rejected by genome-wide analysis of rare amino acid replacements. Mol Biol Evol. 24:1080-1090.
14. Rokas A, Carroll SB. 2006. Bushes in the tree of life. PLoS Biol. 4:e352.
15. Rokas A, Holland PW. 2000. Rare genomic changes as a tool for phylogenetics. Trends Ecol Evol. 15:454-459.
16. Rokas A, King N, Finnerty J, Carroll SB. 2003. Conflicting phylogenetic signals at the base of the metazoan tree. Evol Dev. 5:346-359.
17. Rokas A, Kruger D, Carroll SB. 2005. Animal evolution and the molecular signature of radiations compressed in time. Science. 310:1933-1938.
18. Stuart GW, Berry MW. 2004. An SVD-based comparison of nine whole eukaryotic genomes supports a coelomate rather than ecdysozoan lineage. BMC Bioinformatics. 5:204.
19. Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ. 1997. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science. 278:631-637.
20. Telford MJ, Copley RR. 2005. Animal phylogeny: fatal attraction. Curr Biol. 15:R296-R299.
21. Wolf YI, Rogozin IB, Koonin EV. 2004. Coelomata and not Ecdysozoa: evidence from genome-wide phylogenetic analysis. Genome Res. 14:29-36.