Human resource management, strategy and operational performance in the Spanish manufacturing industry

Management

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 175-199

  Bayo Moriones, Alberto ^a   De Cerio, Javier Merino Díaz ^a  

^a PUBLIC UNIVERSITY OF NAVARRE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37549029601     PISSN: 12864892     EISSN: 12864692     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3917/mana.053.0175     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. ■ Arthur, J. B. 1992 The Link between Business Strategy and Industrial Relations Systems in American Steel Minimills, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45(3): 488-506.
2. ■ Arthur, J. B. 1994 Effects of Human Resource Systems on Manufacturing Performance and Turnover, Academy of Management Journal, 37(3): 670-687.
3. ■ Baird, L, and I. Meshoulam 1988 Managing Two Fits of Strategic Human Resource Management, Academy of Management Review, 13(1): 116-128.
4. ■ Bartel, A. P. 1994 Productivity Gains from the Implementation of Employee Training Programs, Industrial Relations, 33(4): 411-425.
5. ■ Becker, B., and B. Gerhart 1996 The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects, Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 779-801.
6. ■ Becker, B. E., and M. A. Huselid 1998 High Performance Work Systems and Firm Performance: A Synthesis of Research and Managerial Implications, in G. Ferris (Ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 16, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 53-101.
7. ■ Black, S. E., and L. M. Lynch 2000 What's Driving the New Economy: The Benefits of Workplace Innovation, NBER Working Paper Series, no. 7479, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
8. ■ Black, S. E., and L. M. Lynch 2000 How to Compete: The Impact of Work-place Practices and Information Technology on Productivity, Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(3): 434-445.
9. ■ Cappelli, P., and D. Neumark 2001 Do "High Performance" Work Practices Improve Establishment-Level Outcomes?, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54(4): 737-775
10. ■ Corbett, C., and L. Van Wassenhove 1993 Trade-offs? What Trade-offs? Competence and Competitiveness in Manufacturing Strategy, California Management Review, 35(4): 107-122.
11. ■ Delaney, J. T., and M. A. Huselid 1996 The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Perceptions of Organizational Performance, Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 949-969.
12. ■ Dess, G. G., and R. B. Robinson, Jr. 1984 Measuring Organisational Performance in the Absence of Objective Measures: The Case of the Privately-held Firm and Conglomerate Business Unit, Strategic Management Journal, 5(3): 265-273.
13. ■ Dyer, L., and T. Reeves 1995 Human Resource Strategies and Firm Performance: What Do We Know and Where Do We Need to Go?, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 6(3): 656-670.
14. ■ Fey, C. F., I. Björkman, and A. Pavlovskaya 2000 The Effect of Human Resource Management Practices on Firm Performance in Russia, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(1): 1-18.
15. ■ Filippini R., C. Forza, and A. Vinelli 1998 Trade-off and Compatibility between Performance: Definitions and Empirical Evidence, International Journal of Production Research, 36(12): 3379-3406.
16. ■ Guest, D. E. 1997 Human Resource Management and Performance: A Review and Research Agenda, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(3): 263-276.
17. ■ Harel, G. H., and S. S. Tzafrir 1999 The Effect of Human Resource Management Practices on the Perceptions of Organizational and Market Performance of the Firm, Human Resource Management, 38(3): 185-200.
18. ■ Holzer, H.J. 1987 Hiring Procedures in the Firm: Their Economic Determinants and Outcomes, in M. M. Kleiner, R. N. Block, M. Roomkin and S. W. Salsburg (Eds.), Human Resources and the Performance of the Firm, Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association, 243-274.
19. ■ Hoque, K. 1999 Human Resource Management and Performance in the UK Hotel Industry, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 37(3): 419-443.
20. ■ Huselid, M. A. 1995 The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance, Academy of Management Journal, 38(3): 635-672.
21. ■ Huselid, M. A., and B. E. Becker 1996 Methodological Issues in Cross-Sectional and Panel Estimates of the Human Resource-Firm Performance Link, Industrial Relations, 35(3): 400-422.
22. ■ Ichniowski, C. 1990 Human Resource Management Systems and the Performance of U.S. Manufacturing Businesses, NBER Working Paper Series, no. 3449, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
23. ■ Ichniowski, C, and K. Shaw 1999 The Effects of Human Resource Management Systems on Economic Performance: An International Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Plants, Management Science, 45(5): 704-721.
24. ■ Ichniowski, C., K. Shaw, and G. Prennushi 1997 The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity: A Study of Steel Finishing Lines, American Economic Review, 87(3): 291-313.
25. ■ Ichniowski, C., T. A. Kochan, D. Levine, C. Olson, and G. Strauss 1996 What Works at Work: Overview and Assessment, Industrial Relations, 35(3): 299-333.
26. ■ Kalleberg, A. L., and J. W. Moody 1994 Human Resource Management and Organizational Performance, American Behavioral Scientist, 37(7): 948-962.
27. ■ Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton 1992 The Balanced Scorecard-Measures that Drive Performance, Harvard Business Review, 70(1): 71-79.
28. ■ Katz, H. C., T. A. Kochan, and K. R. Gobeille 1983 Industrial Relations Performance, Economic Performance, and QWL Programs: An Interplant Analysis, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 37(1): 3-17.
29. ■ Liouville, J., and M. Bayad 1998 Human Resource Management and Performances: Proposition and Test of a Causal Model, Human Systems Management, 17(3): 183-192.
30. ■ MacDuffie J. P. 1995 Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(2): 197-221.
31. ■ Maddala, G. S. 1983 Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. ■ McNabb, R., and K. Whitfield 1999 The Distribution of Employee Participation Schemes at the Workplace, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10(1): 122-136.
33. ■ Miles, R., and C. Snow 1984 Designing Strategic Human Resource Management Systems, Organizational Dynamics, 13(1): 36-52.
34. ■ Morishima, M. 1991 Information Sharing and Firm Performance in Japan, Industrial Relations, 30(1): 37-61.
35. ■ Neely, A., M. Gregory, and K. Platts 1995 Performance Measurement System Design: A Literature Review and Research Agenda, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4): 80-116.
36. ■ Osterman, P. 1994 How Common is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts It?, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 47(2): 173-188.
37. ■ Pil, F. K., and J. P. MacDuffie 1996 The Adoption of High-Involvement Work Practices, Industrial Relations, 35(3): 423-455.
38. ■ Porter, M. E. 1980 Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, New York: Free Press.
39. ■ Powell, T. C. 1995 Total Quality Management as Competitive Advantage: A Review and Empirical Study, Strategic Management Journal, 16(1): 15-37.
40. ■ Schuler, R. S., and S. E. Jackson 1987 Linking Competitive Strategies with Human Resource Management Practices, Academy of Management Executive, 1(3): 207-219.
41. ■ Tichy, N. M., C. J. Fombrun, and M. A. Devanna 1982 Strategic Human Resource Management, Sloan Management Review, 23(2): 47-61.
42. ■ Venkatraman, N., and V. Ramanujam 1986 Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches, Academy of Management Review, 11(4): 801-814.
43. ■ Venkatraman, N., and V. Ramanujam 1987 Measurement of Business Economic Performance: An Examination of Method Convergence, Journal of Management, 13(1): 109-122.
44. ■ Weitzman, M. L., and D. L. Kruse 1990 Profit Sharing and Productivity, in A. S. Blinder (Ed.), Paying for Productivity: A Look at the Evidence, Washington DC: The Brookings Institution, 95-140.
45. ■ Whitfield K., and M. Poole 1997 Organizing Employment for High Performance: Theories, Evidence and Poli-cy, Organization Studies, 18(5): 745-764.
46. ■ Wood, S., and M. T. Albanese 1995 Can We Speak of a High Commitment Management on the Shop Floor?, Journal of Management Studies, 32(2): 215-247.
47. ■ Wood, S., and L. de Menezes 1998 High Commitment Management in the U.K.: Evidence from the Workplace Industrial Relations Survey, and Employers' Manpower and Skills Practices Survey, Human Relations, 51(4): 485-515.
48. ■ Wright, P. M., and G. C. McMahan 1992 Theoretical Perspectives for Strategic Human Resource Management, Journal of Management, 18(2): 295-320.
49. ■ Wright, P. M., G. C. McMahan, and A. McWilliams 1994 Human Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based Perspective, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 5(2): 301-326.
50. ■ Wright, P. M., and W. S. Sherman 1999 Failing to Find Fit in Strategic Human Resource Management: Theoretical and Empirical Problems, in P. M. Wright, L. D. Dyer, J. W. Boudreau and G. T. Milkovich (Eds.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, supplement 4, Stamford, CT: JAI Press, 53-74.
51. ■ Youndt, M. A., S. A. Snell, J. W. Dean, Jr., and D. P. Lepak 1996 Human Resource Management, Manufacturing Strategy, and Firm Performance, Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 836-866.