Predator interference emerging from trophotaxis in predator-prey systems: An individual-based approach

Ecological Complexity

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 48-58

  Tyutyunov, Yuri ^a   Titova, Lyudmila ^a   Arditi, Roger ^b  

^a SOUTHERN FEDERAL UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^b AGROPARISTECH   (France)

Author keywords

Emergence of predator dependence; Functional response; Individual based model; Monte Carlo simulation; Prey taxis; Pursuit evasion; Ratio dependence; Spatial movement; Taxis; Trophic function

Indexed keywords

EID: 37449024647     PISSN: 1476945X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Akçakaya H.R. Population-cycles of mammals-evidence for a ratio-dependent predation hypothesis. Ecol. Monogr. 62 (1992) 119-142
2. Arditi R., and Akçakaya H.R. Underestimation of mutual interference of predators. Oecologia 83 (1990) 358-361
3. Arditi R., and Berryman A.A. The biological control paradox. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6 (1991) 32
4. Arditi R., Callois J.-M., Tyutyunov Yu., and Jost C. Does mutual interference always stabilize predator-prey dynamics? A comparison of models. C. R. Biol. 327 (2004) 1037-1057
5. Arditi R., and Ginzburg L.R. Coupling in predator-prey dynamics: ratio-dependence. J. Theor. Biol. 139 (1989) 311-326
6. Arditi R., and Saïah H. Empirical evidence of the role of heterogeneity in ratio-dependent consumption. Ecology 73 (1992) 1544-1551
7. Arditi R., Tyutyunov Yu., Morgulis A., Govorukhin V., and Senina I. Directed movement of predators and the emergence of density-dependence in predator-prey models. Theor. Popul. Biol. 59 (2001) 207-221
8. Beddington J.R. Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency. J. Anim. Ecol. 45 (1975) 331-340
9. Bergström U., Englund G., and Leonardsson K. Plugging space into predator-prey models: an empirical approach. Am. Nat. 167 (2006) 246-259
10. Bernstein C., Auger P., and Poggiale J.C. Predator migration decisions, the ideal free distribution, and predator-prey dynamics. Am. Nat. 153 (1999) 267-283
11. Berryman A.A. The theoretical foundations of biological control. In: Hawkins B.A., and Cornell H.V. (Eds). Theoretical Approaches to Biological Control (1999), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 3-21
12. Blaine T.W., and DeAngelis D.L. The interaction of spatial scale and predator-prey functional response. Ecol. Model. 95 (1997) 319-328
13. Bohannan B.J.M., and Lenski R.E. Effect of resource enrichment on a chemostat community of bacteria and bacteriophage. Ecology 78 (1997) 2303-2315
14. Bohannan B.J.M., and Lenski R.E. Effect of prey heterogeneity on the response of a model food chain to resource enrichment. Am. Nat. 153 (1999) 73-82
15. Chesson P.L., and Murdoch W.W. Aggregation of risk: relationships among host-parasitoid models. Am. Nat. 127 (1986) 696-715
16. Cosner C., DeAngelis D.L., Ault J.S., and Olson D.B. Effects of spatial grouping on the functional response of predators. Theor. Popul. Biol. 56 (1999) 65-75
17. DeAngelis D.L., Goldstein R.A., and O'Neill R.V. A model for trophic interaction. Ecology 56 (1975) 881-892
18. Efron B., and Tibshirani R.J. An Introduction to the Bootstrap (1993), Chapman and Hall, London
19. Free C.A., Beddington J.R., and Lawton J.H. On the inadequacy of simple models of mutual interference for parasitism and predation. J. Anim. Ecol. 36 (1977) 375-389
20. Gause G.F. Experimental demonstrations of Volterra's periodic oscillations in the numbers of animals. J. Exp. Biol. 12 (1935) 44-48
21. Ginzburg, L.R., Jensen, C.X.J., 2008. From controversy to consensus: The indirect interference functional response. Proceedings of the International Association of Theoretical and Applied Limnology 30, in press.
22. Hassell M.P. The Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Host-Parasitoid Interactions (2000), Oxford University Press, Oxford
23. Hassell M.P., and Varley G.C. New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control. Nature 223 (1969) 1133-1137
24. Haydon D.T., and Lloyd A.L. On the origins of the Lotka-Volterra equations. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. 3 (1999) 205-206
25. Holling C.S. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small mammal predation of the European pine sawfly. Can. Entomol. 91 (1959) 293-320
26. Ivlev V.S. Experimental Ecology of the Feeding of Fishes. Pishchepromizdat, Moscow (1955) [in Russian]
27. Ivlev V.S. Experimental Ecology of the Feeding of Fishes (1961), Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT
28. Jeschke J.M., Kopp M., and Tollrian R. Consumer-food systems: why type I functional responses are exclusive to filter feeders. Biol. Rev. 79 (2004) 337-349
29. Jost C., and Arditi R. Identifying predator-prey processes from time series. Theor. Popul. Biol. 57 (2000) 325-337
30. Jost C., Devulder G., Vucetich J.A., Peterson R.O., and Arditi R. The wolves of Isle Royale display scale-invariant satiation and ratio-dependent predation on moose. J. Anim. Ecol. 74 (2005) 809-816
31. Jost C., and Ellner S.P. Testing for predator dependence in predator-prey dynamics: a non-parametric approach. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 267 (2000) 1611-1620
32. Lotka A.J. Elements of Physical Biology (1925), Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore
33. Luck R.F. Evaluation of natural enemies for biological control: a behavioral approach. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5 (1990) 196-199
34. Luckinbill L.S. Coexistence in laboratory populations of Paramecium aurelia and its predator Didinium nasutum. Ecology 54 (1973) 1320-1327
35. May R.M. Host-parasitoid systems in patchy environments: a phenomenological model. J. Anim. Ecol. 47 (1978) 833-844
36. Oksanen L., Fretwell S.D., Arruda J., and Niemela P. Exploitation ecosystems in gradients of primary productivity. Am. Nat. 118 (1981) 240-261
37. Poggiale J.Ch., Michalski J., and Arditi R. Emergence of donor control in patchy predator-prey systems. Bull. Math. Biol. 60 (1998) 1149-1166
38. Rosenzweig M.L. Paradox of enrichment: destabilization of exploitation ecosystem in ecological time. Science 171 (1971) 385-387
39. Skalski G.T., and Gilliam J.F. Functional responses with predator interference: viable alternatives to the Holling type II model. Ecology 82 (2001) 30083-33092
40. Sutherland W.J. Aggregation and the 'ideal free distribution'. J. Anim. Ecol. 52 (1983) 821-828
41. Trần, J.K., 2008. A predator-prey functional response incorporating indirect interference and depletion. Proceedings of the International Association of Theoretical and Applied Limnology 30, in press.
42. Tully T., Cassey P., and Ferrière R. Functional response: rigorous estimation and sensitivity to genetic variation in prey. OIKOS 111 (2005) 479-487
43. Veilleux B.G. An analysis of the predatory interaction between Paramecium and Didinium. J. Anim. Ecol. 48 (1979) 787-803
44. Volterra V. Fluctuations in the abundance of species considered mathematically. Nature 118 (1926) 558-560
45. Volterra V. Leçons sur la Théorie Mathématique de la Lutte Pour la Vie (1931), Gauthier-Villars, Paris
46. Vucetich J.A., Peterson R.O., and Schaefer C.L. The effect of prey and predator densities on wolf predation. Ecology 83 (2002) 3003-3013