Identifying predator-prey processes from time-series

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 325-337

  Jost, Christian ^a   Arditi, Roger ^a  

^a AGROPARISTECH   (France)

Author keywords

Functional response; Model selection; Observation error; Predator prey model; Process error; Time series

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL MODELING; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; TIME SERIES;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0033894273     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/tpbi.2000.1463     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Abrams P. A. The fallacies of "ratio-dependent" predation. Ecology. 75:1994;1842-1850.
2. Abrams P. A. Anomalous predictions of ratio-dependent models of predation. Oikos. 80:1997;163-171.
3. Akçakaya H. R., Arditi R., Ginzburg L. R. Ratio-dependent predation: An abstraction that works. Ecology. 76:1995;995-1004.
4. Arditi R., Ginzburg L. R. Coupling in predator-prey dynamics: Ratio-dependence. J. Theor. Biol. 139:1989;311-326.
5. Arditi R., Michalski J. Nonlinear food web models and their responses to increased basal productivity. Polis G. A., Winemiller K. O. Food Webs: Integrations of Patterns and Dynamics. 1995;122-133 Chapman & Hall, London/New York.
6. Bohannan B. J. M., Lenski R. E. Effect of resource enrichment on a chemostat community of bacteria and bacteriophage. Ecology. 78:1997;2303-2315.
7. Carpenter S. R., Cottingham K. L., Stow C. A. Fitting predator-prey models to time series with observation errors. Ecology. 75:1994;1254-1264.
8. Clutton-Brock M. Likelihood distributions for estimating functions when both variables are subject to error. Technometrics. 9:1967;261-269.
9. Contois D. E. Kinetics of bacterial growth: Relationship between population density and specific growth rate of continuous cultures. J. Gen. Microbiol. 21:1959;40-50.
10. Cosner C. Variability, vagueness and comparison methods for ecological models. Bull. Math. Biol. 58:1996;207-246.
11. DeAngelis D. L., Goldstein R. A., O'Neill R. V. A model for trophic interactions. Ecology. 56:1975;881-892.
12. Ellner S., Turchin P. Chaos in a noisy world: New methods and evidence from time-series analysis. Am. Nat. 145:1995;343-375.
13. Feller W. On the logistic law of growth and its empirical verifications in biology. Acta Biotheoret. 5:1939;51-65.
14. Freedman H. I., Mathsen R. M. Persistence in predator-prey systems with ratio-dependent predator influence. Bull. Math. Biol. 55:1993;817-827.
15. Gause G. F., Smaragdova N. P., Witt A. A. Further studies of interactions between predators and prey. J. Anim. Ecol. 5:1936;1-18.
16. Ginzburg L. R. Assuming reproduction to be a function of consumption raises doubts about some popular predator-prey models. J. Anim. Ecol. 67:1998;325-327.
17. Hansson L.-A., Brömark P. N., Greenberg L., Lundberg P., Nilsson P. A., Persson A., Pettersson L. B., Romare P., Tranvik L. J. Consumption patterns, complexity and enrichment in aquatic food chains. Proc. R. Soc. London B. 265:1998;901-906.
18. Harrison G. W. Comparing predator-prey models to Luckinbill's experiment with Didinium and Paramecium. Ecology. 76:1995;357-374.
19. Hassell M. P., Varley G. C. New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control. Nature. 223:1969;1133-1137.
20. Hilborn R., Mangel M. The Ecological Detective. 1997;Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
21. Holling C. S. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can. Entomol. 91:1959;385-398.
22. Ivlev V. S. Experimental Ecology of the Feeding of Fishes. 1961;Yale Univ. Press, New Haven.
23. Jost C. Comparing Predator-Prey Models Qualitatively and Quantitatively with Ecological Time-Series Data. 1998;Institut national agronomique, Paris-Grignon.
24. Kuang Y., Beretta E. Global qualitative analysis of a ratio-dependent predator-prey system. J. Math. Biol. 36:1998;389-406.
25. Lotka A. J. Elements of Physical Biology. 1924;Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.
26. Luckinbill L. S. Coexistence in laboratory populations of Paramecium aurelia and its predator Didinium nasutum. Ecology. 54:1973;1320-1327.
27. Mazumder A. Patterns of algal biomass in dominant odd-vs. even-link lake ecosystems. Ecology. 75:1994;1141-1149.
28. McCarthy M. A., Ginzburg L. R., Akçakaya H. R. Predator interference across trophic chains. Ecology. 76:1995;1310-1319.
29. Michalski J., Arditi R. Food web structure at equilibrium and far from it: Is it the same? Proc. R. Soc. London B. 259:1995;217-222.
30. Monod J. Recherches sur la croissance des cultures bactériennes. 1942;Hermann, Paris.
31. Murdoch W. A., Oaten A. Predation and population stability. Adv. Ecol. Res. 9:1975;2-132.
32. Pascual M. A., Kareiva P. Predicting the outcome of competition using experimental data: Maximum likelihood and Bayesian approaches. Ecology. 77:1996;337-349.
33. Pavé A. Modélisation en biologie et en écologie. 1994;Aléas Editeur, Lyon.
34. Press W. H., Teukolsky S. A., Vetterling W. T., Flannery B. P. Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing. 1992;Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
35. Ratkowsky D. A. Nonlinear Regression Modeling. 1983;Dekker, New York.
36. Rubel L. A. A universal differential equation. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.). 4:1981;345-349.
37. Sarnelle O. Inferring process from pattern: Trophic level abundances and imbedded interactions. Ecology. 75:1994;1835-1841.
38. Seber G. A. F., Wild C. J. Nonlinear Regression. 1989;Wiley, New York.
39. Smale S. On the differential equations of species in competition. J. Math. Biol. 3:1976;5-7.
40. Solomon M. E. The natural control of animal populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 18:1949;1-35.
41. Sommer U., Gliwicz Z. M., Lampert W., Duncan A. The PEG-model of seasonal succession of planktonic events in fresh waters. Arch. Hydrobiol. 106:1986;433-471.
42. Stow C. A., Carpenter S. R., Cottingham K. L. Resource versus ratio-dependent consumer-resource models: A Bayesian perspective. Ecology. 76:1995;1986-1990.
43. Walter E. Identifiability of Parametric Models. 1987;Pergamon, Elmsford.