Functional response: Rigorous estimation and sensitivity to genetic variation in prey

Oikos

Volumn 111, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 479-487

  Tully, Thomas ^a   Cassey, Phillip ^a,b   Ferrière, Régis ^a,c  

^a ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c The University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COEVOLUTION; COMMUNITY ECOLOGY; FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE; GENETIC VARIATION; PREY AVAILABILITY;

ACARI; CANDIDA; FOLSOMIA CANDIDA; PERGAMASUS CRASSIPES;

EID: 29144475842     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2005.14062.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abrams, P. A. 1982. Functional responses of optimal foragers. - Am. Nat. 120: 382-390.
2. Abrams, P. A. 1987. The nonlinearity of competitive effects in models of competition for essential resources. - Theor. Popul. Biol. 32: 50-65.
3. Abrams, P. A. 1990. The effects of adaptive behavior of the type-2 functional response. - Ecol. Washington DC 71: 877-885.
4. Abrams, P. A. 2000. The evolution of predator-prey interactions: theory and evidence. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31: 79-105.
5. Abrams, P. A., Hill, C. and Elmgren, R. 1990. The functional response of the predatory polychaete Harmothoe sarsi to the amphipod Pontoporeia affinis. - Oikos 59: 261-269.
6. Braendle, C. and Weisser, W. W. 2001. Variation in escape behavior of red and green clones of the pea aphid. - J. Insect Behav. 14: 497-509.
7. Crawley, M. J. 1983. Herbivory: the dynamics of animal-plant interactions. - Univ. of California Press.
8. Dercole, F., Ferrière, R. and Rinaldi, S. 2002. Ecological bistability and evolutionary reversals under asymmetrical competition. - Evolution 56: 1081-1090.
9. Fan, Y. Q. and Petitt, F. L. 1994. Parameter estimation of the functional response. - Environ. Entomol. 23: 785-794.
10. Fan, Y. Q. and Petitt, F. L. 1997. Functional response, variance, and regression analysis: A reply to Williams and Juliano. - Environ. Entomol. 26: 1-3.
11. Fox, G. A. 2001. Failure-time analysis. - In: Scheiner, S. M. and Gurevitch, J. (eds), Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Oxford Univ. Press.
12. Haccou, P. and Meelis, E. 1992. Statistical analysis of behavioural data: an approach based on time-structured models. - Oxford Univ. Press.
13. Hassell, M. P. 1978. The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. - Princeton Univ. Press.
14. Hassell, M. P., Lawton, J. H. and Beddington, J. R. 1977. Sigmoid functional responses by invertebrate predators and parasitoids. - J. Anim. Ecol. 46: 249-262.
15. Heimpel, G. E. and Hough, G. J. A. 1994. Components of the functional response of Perillus bioculatus (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). - Environ. Entomol. 23: 855-859.
16. Holling, C. S. 1959a. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European pine sawfly. - Can. Entomol. 91: 293-320.
17. Holling, C. S. 1959b. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. - Can. Entomol. 91: 385-398.
18. Holling, C. S. 1966. The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density. - Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can. 48: 1-86.
19. Hopkin, S. P. 1997. Biology of the springtails (Insecta: Collembola). - Oxford Univ. Press.
20. Houck, M. A. and Strauss, R. E. 1985. The comparative study of functional responses, experimental design and statistical interpretation. - Can. Entomol. 117: 617-630.
21. Ihaka, R. and Gentleman, R. 1996. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. - J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 5: 299-314.
22. Jeschke, J. M., Kopp, M. and Tollrian, R. 2002. Predator functional responses: discriminating between handling and digesting prey. - Ecol. Monogr. 72: 95-112.
23. Juliano, S. A. 2001. Nonlinear curve fitting. - In: Scheiner, S. M. and Gurevitch, J. (eds), Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 178-198.
24. Juliano, S. A. and Williams, F. M. 1985. On the evolution of handling time. - Evolution 39: 212-215.
25. Kabissa, J. C. B., Yarro, J. G., Kayumbo, H. Y. et al. 1996. Functional responses of two chrysopid predators feeding on Helicoverpa armigera (Lep: Noctuidae) and Aphis gossypii (Hom: Aphididae). - Entomophaga 41: 141-151.
26. Livdahl, T. P. 1979. Evolution of handling time-functional-response of a predator to the density of sympatric and allopatric strains of prey. - Evolution 33: 765-768.
27. Messina, F. J. and Hanks, J. B. 1998. Host plant alters the shape of the functional response of an aphid predator (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). - Environ. Entomol. 27: 1196-1202.
28. Nannini, M. A. and Juliano, S. A. 1998. Effects of the facultative predator Anopheles barberi on population performance of its prey Aedes triseriatus (Diptera Culicidae). - Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 91: 33-42.
29. Nilsson, E. and Bengtsson, G. 2004. Death odour changes movement pattern of a Collembola. - Oikos 104: 509-517.
30. Pinheiro, J. C. and Bates, D. M. 2000. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. - Springer-Verlag.
31. Rogers, D. J. 1972. Random search and insect population models. - J. Anim. Ecol. 41: 369-383.
32. Russo, R. 1986. Comparison of predatory behavior in five species of Toxorhynchites (Diptera: Culicidae). - Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 77: 312-318.
33. Sih, A. 1980. Optimal foraging-partial consumption of prey. - Am. Nat. 116: 281-290.
34. Solomon, M. E. 1949. The natural control of animal populations. - J. Anim. Ecol. 18: 1-35.
35. Song, Y. H. and Heong, K. L. 1997. Changes in searching responses with temperature of Cyrtorhinus lividipennis Reuter (Hemiptera: Miridae) on the eggs of the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stal.) (Homoptera: Delphacidae). - Res. Popul. Ecol. 39: 201-206.
36. Stephens, D. W. and Krebs, J. R. 1986. Foraging theory. - Princeton Univ. Press.
37. Thompson, D. J. 1975. Towards a predator-prey model incorporating age structure: the effects of predator and prey size on the predation of Daphnia magna by Ischnure elegans. - J. Anim. Ecol. 44: 907-916.
38. Trexler, J. C., McCulloch, C. E. and Travis, J. 1988. How can the functional response best be determined. - Oecologia 76: 206-214.
39. Tully, T. 2004. Facteurs maternels, génétiques et environnementaux de l'expression des traits d'histoire de vie chez le collembole Folsomia candida, Willem (Isotomidae). Ecole Doctorale Diversité du Vivant. Univ. Pierre et Marie Curie, p. 237.
40. Venable, W. N. and Ripley, B. D. 1999. Modern applied statistics with S-PLUS. - Springer-Verlag.
41. Vermeij, G. J. 1982. Unsuccessful predation and evolution. - Am. Nat. 120: 701-720.
42. Weisser, W. W., Braendle, C. and Minoretti, N. 1999. Predator-induced morphological shift in the pea aphid. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 266: 1175-1181.
43. Wellenreuther, M. and Connell, S. D. 2002. Response of predators to prey abundance: separating the effects of prey density and patch size. - J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 273: 61-71.
44. Willem, V. 1902. Note préliminaire sur les collemboles des grottes de Han et de Rochefort. - Ann. Soc. Entomol. Belg. 46: 275-283.
45. Williams, F. M. and Juliano, S. A. 1996. Functional responses revisited. - Environ. Entomol. 25: 549-550.
46. Wood, S. N. and Thomas, M. B. 1999. Super-sensitivity to structure in biological models. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 266: 565-570.
47. Yoshida, T., Urabe, J. and Elser, J. J. 2003. Assessment of 'top-down' and 'bottom-up' forces as determinants of rotifer distribution among lakes in Ontario, Canada. - Ecol. Res. 18: 639-650.