Effects of spatial grouping on the functional response of predators

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 65-75

  Cosner, Chris ^a   Deangelis, Donald L ^a   Ault, Jerald S ^b   Olson, Donald B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

Beddington DeAngelis models; Functional response; HasselI Varley models; Predator prey; Spatial heterogeneity

Indexed keywords

FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 0033180314     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/tpbi.1999.1414     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abrams P. A. The fallacies of ratio-dependent predation. Ecology. 75:1994;1842-1850.
2. Abrams P. A., Walters C. J. Invulnerable prey and the paradox of enrichment. Ecology. 77:1996;1125-1133.
3. Abrams P. A. Anomalous predictions of ratio-dependent models of predation. Oikos. 80:1997;163-171.
4. Arditi R., Ginzburg L. R. Coupling in predator-prey dynamics: Ratio dependence. J. Theor. Biol. 139:1989;311-326.
5. Arditi R., Perrin N., Saiah H. Functional responses and heterogeneities. An experimental test with cladocerans. Oikos. 60:1991;69-75.
6. Arditi R., Saiah H. Empirical evidence of the role of heterogeneity in ratio-dependent consumption. Ecology. 73:1992;1544-1551.
7. Beddington J. R. Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency. J. Anim. Ecol. 44:1975;331-340.
8. Berryman A. A. The origins and evolution of predator-prey theory. Ecology. 73:1992;1530-1535.
9. Berryman A. A., Gutierrez A. P., Arditi R. Credible, parsimonious, and useful predator-prey models - A reply to Abrams, Gleeson, and Sarnelle. Ecology. 76:1995;1980-1985.
10. Bertram B. C. R. Living in groups: Predators and prey. Krebs J. R., Davies N. B. Behavioral Ecology. 1978;Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.
11. Blaine T. W., DeAngelis D. L. The interaction of spatial scale and predator-prey functional response. Ecol. Modelling. 95:1997;319-328.
12. Cantrell R. S., Cosner C. The effect of spatial heterogeneity population dynamics. J. Math. Biol. 29:1991;315-338.
13. Cantrell R. S., Cosner C. Should a park be an island? SIAM J. Appl. Math. 53:1993;219-252.
14. Cantrell R. S., Cosner C. Insular biogeographic theory and diffusion models in population dynamics. Theor. Popul. Biol. 45:1994;177-202.
15. DeAngelis D. L., Goldstein R. A., O'Neill R. V. A model for trophic interaction. Ecology. 56:1975;881-892.
16. Diehl S. P., Lundberg P. A., Gardfjell H., Oksanen L., Persson L. Daphia-phytoplankton interactions in lakes: Is there a need for ratio-dependent consumer-resource models? Am. Nat. 142:1993;1052-1061.
17. Frazer B. D., Gilbert N. Coccinellids and aphids: A quantitative study of the impact of adult Ladybirds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) preying on field populations of pea aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae). J. Entomol. Soc. Br. Columbia. 73:1976;33-59.
18. Gerritsen J., Strickler J. R. Encounter probabilities and community structure in zooplankton: A mathematical model. J. Fish. Res. Board. Con. 34:1977;73-82.
19. Ginzburg L., Akçakaya H. R. Consequences of ratio-dependent predation for steady-state properties of ecosystems. Ecology. 73:1992;1536-1543.
20. Gleeson S. K. Density dependence is better than ratio dependence. Ecology. 75:1994;1552-1563.
21. Gutierrez A. P. Physiological basis of ratio-dependent predator-prey theory: The metabolic pool model as a paradigm. Ecology. 73:1992;1552-1563.
22. Hassell M. P., Varley G. C. New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control. Nature (London). 223:1969;1133-1137.
23. Holling C. S. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small mammal predation of the European pine sawfly. Can. Entomol. 91:1959a;293-320.
24. Holling C. S. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Entomol. 91:1959b;385-398.
25. Holmes W. J. Underseas Victory. 1966;Kensington Pub. Co. New York.
26. Leslie P. H. Some further notes on the use of matrices in population mathematics. Biometrika. 35:1948;213-245.
27. Lotka A. J. The Elements of Physical Biology. 1925;Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.
28. Major P. E. Predator-prey interactions in two schooling fishes, Carnax ignobilis and Stolephorus purpureus. Anim. Behav. 26:1978;760-777.
29. Morison S. E. The Two Ocean War. 1963;Ballantine Books, New York.
30. Murray J. D. Mathematical Biology. 1993;Springer-Verlag, New York.
31. Oksanen T. Exploitation ecosystems in heterogenous habitat complexes. Evol. Ecol. 4:1990;220-234.
32. Oksanen T., Power M. E., Oksanen L. Ideal free habitat selection and consumer-resource dynamics. Am. Nat. 146:1995;565-585.
33. Packer C., Ruttan L. The evolution of cooperative hunting. Am. Nat. 132:1988;159-198.
34. Partridge B. L., Johannson J., Kalish J. The structure of schools of giant bluefin tuna in Cape Cad Bay. Env. Biol. Fish. 9:1983;253-262.
35. Rosenzweig M. L. The paradox of enrichment: Destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time. Science. 171:1971;385-387.
36. Rothschild B. J., Ault J. S. Population-dynamic instability as a cause of patch structure. Ecol. Modelling. 93:1996;237-249.
37. Rubenstein D. I. On predation, competition, and the advantages of group living. Perspect. Ethol. 3:1978;205-231.
38. Ruxton G., Gurney W. S. C. The interpretation of tests for ratio-dependence. Oikos. 65:1992;334-335.
39. Ruxton G., Gurney W. S. C., DeRoos A. Interference and generation cycles. Theor. Popul. Biol. 42:1992;235-253.
40. Sarnelle O. Inferring process from pattern: Trophic level abundances and imbedded interactions. Ecology. 75:1994;1835-1841.
41. Stow C. A., Carpenter S. R., Cottingham K. L. Resource vs. ratio-dependent consumer-resource models: A Bayesian perspective. Ecology. 76:1995;1985-1990.
42. Tanner J. T. The stability and the intrinsic growth rates of prey and predator populations. Ecology. 56:1975;855-867.
43. Thompson W. R. Biological control and the theories of the interaction of populations. Parasitology. 31:1939;299-388.
44. Volterra V. Variazioni e fluttuazioni del numero d'individui in specie animali conviventi. Mem. Acad. Lincei (6). 2:1926;31-113.