Slow pattern-reversal stimulation facilitates the assessment of retinal function with multifocal recordings

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 119, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 409-417

  Hoffmann, Michael B ^a   Flechner, Johann Joachim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MAGDEBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Human; Multifocal; Onset; PERG; Retina; Reversal; VEP; Visual cortex

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ELECTRORETINOGRAM; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MULTIFOCAL PATTERN ELECTRORETINOGRAM; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RETINA; RETINA GANGLION CELL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SLOW PATTERN REVERSAL STIMULATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 37449021854     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. American Encephalographic Society. Guideline thirteen: guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. J Clin Neurophysiol 1994;11:111-13.
2. Bach M. Electrophysiological approaches for early detection of glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 11 Suppl 2 (2001) 41-49
3. Bach M., and Hoffmann M.B. Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology of vision. In: Heckenlively J.R., and Arden G.B. (Eds). The origin of the pattern electroretinogram (2006), MIT Press, Cambridge London 85-196
4. Bach M., and Kellner U. Elektrophysiologische diagnostik in der ophthalmologie. Ophthalmologe 97 (2000) 898-920
5. Bach M., and Ullrich D. Contrast dependency of motion-onset and pattern-reversal veps: interaction of stimulus type, recording site and response component. Vision Res 37 (1997) 1845-1849
6. Baseler H.A., Sutter E.E., Klein S.A., and Carney T. The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 90 (1994) 65-81
7. Dawson W.W., Trick G.L., and Litzkow C.A. Improved electrode for electroretinography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18 (1979) 988-991
8. Fortune B., and Hood D.C. Conventional pattern-reversal veps are not equivalent to summed multifocal veps. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44 (2003) 1364-1375
9. Harrison W.W., Viswanathan S., and Malinovsky V.E. Multifocal pattern electroretinogram: cellular origins and clinical implications. Optom Vis Sci 83 (2006) 473-485
10. In: Heckenlively J.R., and Arden G.B. (Eds). Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology of vision (2006), MIT Press, Cambridge London
11. Heinrich T.S., and Bach M. Contrast adaptation in retinal and cortical evoked potentials: no adaptation to low spatial frequencies. Vis Neurosci 19 (2002) 645-650
12. Hess R.F., and Baker C.L. Human pattern-evoked electroretinogram. J Neurophysiol 51 (1984) 939-951
13. Hoffmann M.B., and Seufert P.S. Simulated nystagmus reduces pattern-reversal more strongly than pattern-onset multifocal visual evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 116 (2005) 1723-1732
14. Hoffmann M.B., Straube S., and Bach B. Pattern-onset stimulation boosts central multifocal vep responses. J Vis 3 (2003) 432-439
15. Hoffmann MB. Investigating visual function with multifocal visual evoked potentials. In: Lorenz B, Borruat F-X, editors. Essentials in neuroophthalmology (vol. 7/2). Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer; 2007. p. 139-159.
16. Holder GE, Brigell MG, Hawlina M, Meigen T, Vaegan, Bach M. Iscev standard for clinical pattern electroretinography - 2007. Doc Ophthalmol 2007;114:111-16.
17. Hood D.C. Assessing retinal function with the multifocal technique. Prog Retin Eye Res 19 (2000) 607-646
18. Hood D.C., and Greenstein V.C. Multifocal vep and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 22 (2003) 201-251
19. Hood D.C., and Zhang X. Multifocal erg and vep responses and visual fields: comparing disease-related changes. Doc Ophthalmol 100 (2000) 115-137
20. James A.C. The pattern-pulse multifocal visual evoked potential. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44 (2003) 879-890
21. James A.C., Ruseckaite R., and Maddess T. Effect of temporal sparseness and dichoptic presentation on multifocal visual evoked potentials. Vis Neurosci 22 (2005) 45-54
22. Klistorner A.I., and Graham S.L. Effect of eccentricity on pattern-pulse multifocal vep. Doc Ophthalmol 110 (2005) 209-218
23. Klistorner A.I., Graham S.L., Grigg J.R., and Billson F.A. Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: improving objective detection of local visual field defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39 (1998) 937-950
24. Klistorner A.I., Graham S.L., and Martins A. Multifocal pattern electroretinogram does not demonstrate localised field defects in glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol 100 (2000) 155-165
25. Kretschmann U., Bock M., Gockeln R., and Zrenner E. Clinical applications of multifocal electroretinography. Doc Ophthalmol 100 (2000) 99-113
26. Maddess T., James A.C., and Bowman E.A. Contrast response of temporally sparse dichoptic multifocal visual evoked potentials. Vis Neurosci 22 (2005) 153-162
27. Odom J.V., Bach M., Barber C., Brigell M., Marmor M.F., Tormene A.P., et al. Visual evoked potentials standard (2004). Doc Ophthalmol 108 (2004) 115-123
28. Seeliger M.W., Jurklies B., Kellner U., Palmowski A., Bach M., and Kretschmann U. [multifocal electroretinography (mferg)]. Ophthalmologe 98 (2001) 1112-1127
29. Stiefelmeyer S., Neubauer A.S., Berninger T., Arden G.B., and Rudolph G. The multifocal pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma. Vision Res 44 (2004) 103-112
30. Sutter EE. Multi-input ver und erg analysis for objective perimetry. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Inc. 7th ann. Conf., Eng Med Biol Soc, Chicago, 1985:414-19
31. Sutter E.E. The fast m-transform: a fast computation of cross-correlations with binary m-sequences. SIAM J Comput 20 (1991) 686-694
32. Sutter E.E. Imaging visual function with the multifocal m-sequence technique. Vision Res 41 (2001) 1241-1255
33. Sutter E.E., and Tran D. The field topography of erg components in man - i. The photopic luminance response. Vision Res 32 (1992) 433-446
34. Thompson D., and Drasdo N. The effect of stimulus contrast on the latency and amplitude of the pattern electroretinogram. Vision Res 29 (1989) 309-313
35. World Medical Association. Declaration of helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2000;284:3043-45.
36. Zapf H.R., and Bach M. The contrast characteristic of the pattern electroretinogram depends on temporal frequency. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 237 (1999) 93-99
37. Zhang X., Hood D.C., Chen C.S., and Hong J.E. A signal-to-noise analysis of multifocal vep responses: an objective definition for poor records. Doc Ophthalmol 104 (2002) 287-302