The metric properties of the Spanish version of the stroke-adapted 30-item sickness impact profile (SIP30-AI);Propiedades métricas de la versión española del perfil de las consecuencias de la enfermedad de 30 ítems adaptado al ictus (SIP30-AI)

Revista de Neurologia

Volumn 45, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 647-654

  Carod Artal, Francisco Javier ^a   Gonzalez Gutierrez J L ^b   Egido Herrero, J A ^b   Varela De Seijas, E ^b  

^a SARAH NETWORK OF REHABILITATION HOSPITALS   (Brazil)

^b HOSPITAL CLÍNICO SAN CARLOS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Internal consistency; Metric attributes; Sickness impact profile; SIP30 AI; Stroke; Validity

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BARTHEL INDEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; HAMILTON SCALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; KRUSKAL WALLIS TEST; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANKIN SCALE; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 36; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STROKE; STROKE ADAPTED 30 ITEM SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; VALIDITY;

EID: 37349121828     PISSN: 02100010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.33588/rn.4511.2007423     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Carod-Artal FJ. Calidad de vida e ictus. In Martínez-Martín P, ed. Calidad de vida en neurología. Barcelona: Ars Medica; 2006. p. 221-40.
2. Carod-Artal FJ. Escalas específicas para la evaluación de la calidad de vida en el ictus. Rev Neurol 2004; 39: 1052-62.
3. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), I: conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473-83.
4. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 1981; 19: 787-805.
5. Van Straten A, De Haan RJ, Limburg M, Van den Bos GA. Clinical meaning of the Stroke-Adapted Sickness Impact Profile-30 and the Sickness Impact Profile-136. Stroke 2000; 31: 2610-5.
6. Van Straten A, De Haan RJ, Limburg M, Scguling J, Bossuyt PM, Van den Bos GA. A stroke-adapted 30-item version of the Sickness Impact Profile to assess quality of life (SA-SIP30). Stroke 1997; 28: 2155-61.
7. Carod-Artal J, Egido JA, González JL, Varela de Seijas E. Quality of life among stroke survivors evaluated 1 year after stroke: experience of a stroke unit. Stroke 2000; 31: 2995-3000.
8. Foulkes MA, Wolf PA, Price TR, Mohr JP, Hier DB. The Stroke Data Bank: design, methods, and baseline characteristics. Stroke 1988; 19: 547-54.
9. Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kapelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke: definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. Stroke 1993; 24: 35-41.
10. Multicenter trial of hemodilution in ischemic stroke-background and study protocol. Scandinavian Stroke Study Group. Stroke 1985; 16: 885-90.
11. Mahoney PL, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965; 14: 61-5.
12. Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60, II: prognosis. Scott Med J 1957; 2: 200-15.
13. Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960; 23: 56-62.
14. Alonso J, Prieto L, Antó JM. La versión española del SF-36 Health Survey (cuestionario de salud SF-36): un instrumento para la medida de los resultados clínicos. Med Clin (Barc) 1995; 104: 771-6.
15. Boysen G. The Scandinavian Stroke Scale. Cerebrovasc Dis 1992; 2: 239-47.
16. Kasner SE. Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 603-12.
17. Bonita R, Beaglehole R. Modification of Rankin scale: recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke 1988; 19: 1497-1500.
18. Carod-Artal FJ. Depression post-ictus (I). Epidemiología, criterios diagnósticos y factores de riesgo. Rev Neurol 2006; 42: 169-75.
19. Bech P, Allerup P, Gram Lf, Reisby N, Rosenberg R, Jacobsen O, et al. The Hamilton depression scale. Evaluation of objectivity using logistic models. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1981; 63: 290-9.
20. Badía X, Alonso J. Validity and reproducibility of the Spanish version of the Sickness Impact Profile. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 359-65.
21. Badía X, Alonso J. Re-scaling the Spanish version of the Sickness Impact Profile: an opportunity for the assessment of cross-cultural equivalence. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48: 949-57.
22. Martínez-Martín P, Frades-Payo B. Desarrollo de un instrumento de valoración de calidad de vida relacionada con la salud. In Martínez-Martín P, ed. Calidad de vida en neurología. Barcelona: Ars Medica; 2006. p 33-48.
23. McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 293-307.
24. Fayers PM, Machin D, eds. Quality of life: assessment, analysis and interpretation. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
25. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297-334.
26. Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res 2002; 11: 193-205.
27. Buck D, Jacoby A, Massey A, Ford G. Evaluation of measures used to assess quality of life after stroke. Stroke 2000; 31: 2004-10.
28. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
29. Carod-Artal FJ. Medición de la calidad de vida en supervivientes de un ictus. Rev Neurol 1999; 29: 447-55.
30. Van der Linden FA, Kragt JJ, Klein M, Van der Ploeg HM, Polman CH, Uitdehaag BM. Psychometric evaluation of the multiple sclerosis impact scale (MSIS-29) for proxy use. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76: 1677-81.
31. Carod-Artal FJ, Egido-Herrero JA, González-Guitiérrez JL, Varela de Seijas E. Metric attributes of the Sickness Impact Profile Spanish version in stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil 2008 [in press].
32. Nydevik I, Hulter-Åsberg K. Sickness impact after stroke: a three year follow up. Scand J Prim Health Care 1992; 10: 284-9.
33. Carod-Artal FJ. Are mood disorders a stroke risk factor? Stroke 2007; 38: 1-3.
34. Carod-Artal FJ. Depresión postictus (II). Diagnóstico diferencial, complicaciones y tratamiento. Rev Neurol 2006; 42: 238-44.
35. De Haan RJ, Limburg M, Van der Muelen JHP, Jacobs HM, Aaronson NK. Quality of life after stroke: impact of stroke type and lesion location. Stroke 1995; 26: 402-8.
36. Van de Port IG, Ketelaar M, Schepers VP, Van den Bos GA, Lindeman E. Monitoring the functional health status of stroke patients: the value of the Stroke-Adapted Sickness Impact Profile-30. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 635-40.
37. Lindeboom R, Holman R, Dijkgraaf MG, Sprangers MA, Buskens E, Diederiks JP, et al. Scaling the sickness impact profile using item response theory: an exploration of linearity, adaptive use, and patient driven item weights. J Clin Epidemiol 2004; 57: 66-74.