A stroke-adapted 30-item version of the sickness impact profile to assess quality of life (SA-SIP30)

Stroke

Volumn 28, Issue 11, 1997, Pages 2155-2161

  Van Straten, A ^a   De Haan, R J ^b   Limburg, M ^b   Schuling, J ^b   Bossuyt, P M ^b   Van Den Bos, G A M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Quality of life; Stroke assessment; Stroke outcome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN REGION; BRAIN VENTRICLE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; STROKE;

EID: 0030710508     PISSN: 00392499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.28.11.2155     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet. 1991;337:1235-1243.
2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1581-1587.
3. D'Olhaberriague L, Litvan I, Mitsias P, Mansbach HH. A reappraisal of reliability and validity studies in stroke. Stroke. 1996;27: 2331-2336.
4. De Haan R, Limburg M, Bossuyt P, van der Meulen J, Aaronson N. The clinical meaning of Rankin 'handicap' grades. Stroke. 1995;26: 2027-2030.
5. Bergner M, Bobitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care. 1981;19:787-805.
6. De Haan R, Aaronson N, Limburg M, Langton Hewer R, van Crevel H. Measuring quality of life in stroke. Stroke. 1993;24: 320-327.
7. Gill TM, Feinstein AR. A critical appraisal of the quality-of-life measurements. JAMA. 1994:272:619-626.
8. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, Backett EM, Williams J, Papp E. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1980;34:281-286.
9. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, Williams J. Reliability of a population survey tool for measuring perceived health problems: A study of patients with osteoarthrosis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1981; 35:297-300.
10. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-483.
11. De Bruin AF, de Witte LP, Stevens FCJ, Diederiks JPM. Sickness Impact Profile: the state of the art of a generic functional status measure. Soc Sci Med. 1992;35:1008-1014.
12. Anderson RT, Aaronson NK, Wilkin D. Critical review of the international assessments of health related quality of life. Qual Life Res. 1993;2:369-395.
13. Jacobs HM, Luttik A, Touw-Otten FWMM, de Melker RA. De 'sickness impact profile'; resultaten van een valideringsonderzoek van de Nederlandse versie. [The Sickness Impact Profile: results of an evaluation study of the Dutch version] Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1990;134:1950-1954.
14. Van Straten A, van der Meulen JHP, van Crevel H, Habbema JDF, Limburg M. Quality of hospital care for stroke patients in the Netherlands. Cerebrovasc Dis. In press.
15. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Jones L, Warlow C. The natural history of lacunar infarction: the Oxford Community Stroke Project. Stroke. 1987;18:545-551.
16. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61-65.
17. Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability. Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10:64-67.
18. Van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJA, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988;19:604-607.
19. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient α and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297-334.
20. Streiner DL, Norm GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide To Their Development and Use. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press Inc; 1995.
21. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1: 307-310.
22. De Haan R, Limburg M, van der Meulen J, Jacobs H, Aaronson N. Quality of life after stroke: impact of stroke type and lesion location. Stroke. 1995;26:402-408.
23. Schuling J, Greidanus J, Meyboom-de Jong B. Measuring functional status of stroke patients with the Sickness Impact Profile. Disabil Rehabil. 1993;15:19-23.
24. Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain, part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine. 1983;8:141-144.
25. Sullivan M, Ahlmen M, Bjelle A, Karlsson J. Health status assessment in rheumatoid arthritis, II: Evaluation of a Modified Shorter Sickness Impact Profile. J Rheumatol. 1993;20:1500-1507.
26. Gerety MB, Cornell JE, Mulrow CD, Tuley M, Hazuda HP, Lichtenstein M, Aguilar C, Kadri AA, Rosenberg J. The Sickness Impact Profile for Nursing Homes (SIP-NH). J Gerontol. 1994;49: M2-M8.
27. De Bruin AF, Diederiks JPM, de Witte LP, Stevens FCJ, Philipsen H. The development of a short generic version of the Sickness Impact Profile. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:407-418.
28. De Bruin, Buys M, de Witte LP, Diederiks JPM. The Sickness Impact Profile: SIP68, a short generic version - first evaluation of the reliability and reproducibility. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47: 863-871.
29. Post MWM, de Bruin A, de Witte L, Schrijvers A. The SIP68: a measure of health-related functional status in rehabilitation medicine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:440-445.
30. Streppel KRM, van Harten WH, Warmerdam CGM. Short version of the Sickness Impact Profile for evaluating rehabilitation programs. J Rehabil Sci. 1996;9:66-71.
31. Jacobs HM, Touw-Otten FWMM, de Melker RA. The evaluation of changes in functional health status in patients with abdominal complaints. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:163-171.
32. MacKenzie CR, Charlson ME, DiGioia D, Kelley K. Can the Sickness Impact Profile measure change? An example of scale assessment. J Chron Dis. 1986;39:429-438.
33. Beaton DE, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombardier C. Evaluating changes in health status: reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:79-93.
34. Deyo RA, Centor RM. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chron Dis. 1986;39:897-906.
35. Sprangers MAG, Aaronson NK. The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease: a review. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:743-760.
36. Sneeuw KCA, Aaronson NK, de Haan RJ, Limburg M. Assessing quality of life after stroke: the value and limitations of proxy ratings. Stroke. In press.