Removal of suspended solids from tuna spleen extract by microfiltration: A batch process design and improvement

Biochemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 226-233

  Li, Zhenyu ^a   H Kittikun, Aran ^a   Youravong, Wirote ^a  

^a PRINCE OF SONGKLA UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Enzyme production; Filtration; Microporous membranes; Optimization; Pretreatment; Suspended particles

Indexed keywords

BIOFOULING; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FILTRATION; OPTIMIZATION;

CROSSFLOW MICROFILTRATION (CFMF); ENZYME PRODUCTION; MICROPOROUS MEMBRANES; PRETREATMENT; SUSPENDED PARTICLES;

FISH;

CHYMOTRYPSIN; TRYPSIN;

ARTICLE; BATCH PROCESS; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CROSSFLOW FILTRATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FLOW RATE; HOLLOW FIBER MEMBRANE; MICROFILTRATION; NONHUMAN; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DESIGN; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; RECYCLING; SHEAR STRESS; SPLEEN; SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER; TUNA;

SCOMBRIDAE; THUNNUS ALBACARES;

EID: 37349104607     PISSN: 1369703X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2007.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. National Food Institute, 2005, Available from: www.nfi.or.th/statistic.asp.
2. Prasertsan P., Wuttjumnong P., Sophanodora P., and Choorit W. Seafood processing industries within Songkhla-Hat Yai region: the survey of basic data emphasis on waste. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 10 (1988) 447-451
3. Gildberg A., and Shi X.Q. Recovery of tryptic enzymes from fish sauce. Process Biochem. 29 (1994) 151-155
4. Afonso M.D., and Borquez R. Review of the treatment of seafood processing wastewater and recovery of proteins therein by membrane separation processes-prospects of the ultrafiltration of wastewaters from the fish meal industry. Desalination 142 (2002) 29-45
5. Vandanjon L., Cros S., Jaouen P., Quemeneur F., and Bourseau P. Recovery by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis of marine flavours from seafood cooking waters. Desalination 144 (2002) 379-385
6. Dewitt C.A.M., and Morrissey M.T. Parameters for the recovery of proteases from surimi wash water. Bioresour. Technol. 81 (2002) 241-247
7. Li Z.Y., Youravong W., and H-Kittikun A. Separation of proteases from yellowfin tuna spleen by ultrafiltration. Bioresour. Technol. 97 (2006) 2364-2370
8. Li Q.Y., Ghosh R., Bellara S.R., Cui Z.F., and Pepper D.S. Enhancement of ultrafiltration by gas sparging with flat sheet membrane modules. Sep. Purif. Technol. 14 (1998) 79-83
9. Cui Z.F., Chang S., and Fane A.G. The use of gas bubbling to enhance membrane processes. J. Membr. Sci. 221 (2003) 1-35
10. AOAC. In: Cunnif P. (Ed). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 16th ed. (1999), AOAC International
11. Li Q.Y., Cui Z.F., and Pepper D.S. Fractionation of HSA and IgG by gas sparged ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 136 (1997) 181-190
12. Howell J.A. Sub-critical flux operation of microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 107 (1995) 165-171
13. 2 suspensions. J. Membr. Sci. 254 (2005) 295-301
14. Psoch C., and Schiewer S. Long-term study of an intermittent air sparged MBR for synthetic wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 260 (2005) 56-65
15. Pradanos P., Hernandez A., Calvo J.I., and Tejerina F. Mechanisms of protein fouling in cross-flow UF through an asymmetric inorganic membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 114 (1996) 115-126
16. Bai R.B., and Leow H.F. Microfiltration of polydispersed suspension by a membrane screen-hollow fiber composite module. Desalination 140 (2001) 277-287
17. Tracey E.M., and Davis R.H. Protein fouling of track-etched polycarbonate microfiltration membrane. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 167 (1994) 104-116
18. Velasco C., Ouammou M., Calvo J.I., and Hernandez A. Protein fouling in microfiltration: deposition mechanism as a function of pressure for different pH. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 266 (2003) 148-152
19. Meireles M., Aimar P., and Sanchez V. Albumin denaturation during ultrafiltration: effects of operating conditions and consequences on membrane fouling. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 38 (1991) 528-534
20. Bowen W.R., and Gan Q. Properties of microfiltration membrane: the effects of adsorption and shear on the recovery of an enzyme. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 40 (1992) 491-497
21. Metsamuuronen S., Howell J., and Nystrom M. Critical flux in ultrafiltration of myoglobin and baker's yeast. J. Membr. Sci. 196 (2002) 13-25
22. Kwon D.Y., Vigneswaran S., Fane A.G., and Aim R.B. Experimental determination of critical flux in cross-flow microfiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 19 (2000) 169-181
23. Manttari M., and Nystrom M. Critical flux in NF of high molar mass polysaccharides and effluents from the paper industry. J. Membr. Sci. 170 (2000) 257-273
24. Vadi P.K., and Rizvi S.S.H. Experimental evaluation of a uniform transmembrane pressure crossflow microfiltration unit for the concentration of micellar casein from skim milk. J. Membr. Sci. 189 (2001) 69-82
25. Bowen W.R., and Gan Q. Properties of microfiltration membranes: the effects of adsorption and shear on the recovery of an enzyme. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 40 (1992) 491-497
26. Smith S.R., and Cui Z.F. Gas-slug enhanced hollow fibre ultrafiltration: an experimental study. J. Membr. Sci. 242 (2004) 117-128
27. Furukawa T., and Fukano T. Effects of liquid viscosity on flow patterns in vertical upward gas-liquid two-phase flow. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 27 (2001) 1109-1126
28. Mercier-Benin M.C., and Fonadeb C. Fonadeb Air-sparged microfiltration of enzyme/yeast mixtures: determination of optimal conditions for enzyme recovery. Desalination 148 (2002) 171-176