Embodiment and abstraction: Actions create relational representations

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 994-1000

  Trudeau, Jeremiah J ^a   Dixon, James A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37349101076     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194134     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. BARSALOU, L. W. (2005). Abstraction as dynamic interpretation in perceptual symbol systems. In L. Gershkoff-Stowe & D. Rakison (Eds.), Building object categories (pp. 389-431). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. BUCCINO, G., RIGGIO, L., MELLI, G., BINKOSFSKI, G., GALLESE, V., & RIZZOLATTI, G. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 355-363.
3. CATRAMBONE, R. (2002). The effects of surface and structural feature matches on the access of story analogs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 318-334.
4. DIXON, J. A., & BANGERT, A. (2002), The prehistory of discovery: Precursors of representational change in solving gear-system problems. Developmental Psychology, 38, 918-933.
5. DIXON, J. A., & DOHN, M. C. (2003). Redescription disembeds relations: Evidence from relational transfer and use in problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1082-1093.
6. GALLESE, V., & LAKOFF, G. (2005). The brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 455-479.
7. GLENBERG, A. M., & KASCHAK, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558-565.
8. GOLDINGER, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251-279.
9. GOLDINGER, S. D., & AZUMA, T. (2004). Episodic memory reflected in printed word naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 716-722.
10. GRANT, E. R., & SPIVEY, M. J. (2003). Eye movements and problem solving: Guiding attention guides thought. Psychological Science, 14, 462-466.
11. HEGARTY, M. (2004). Mechanical reasoning by mental simulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 280-285.
12. HINTZMAN, D. L. (1986). "Schema abstraction" in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411-428.
13. KALISH, M. L., LEWANDOWSKY, S., & DAVIES, M. (2005). Error-driven knowledge restructuring in categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 846-861.
14. KASCHAK, M. P., & GLENBERG, A. M. (2000). Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 508-529.
15. LOGAN, G. D. (2002). An instance theory of attention and memory. Psychological Review, 109, 376-400.
16. NEWELL, A. (1990), Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. SIEGLER, R. S., & ARAYA, R. (2005). A computational model of conscious and unconscious strategy discovery. In R. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 33, pp. 1-42). Oxford: Elsevier.
18. SINGER, J. D., & WILLETT, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. SOLOMON, K. O., & BARSALOU, L. W. (2001). Representing properties locally. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 129-169.
20. ZWAAN, R. A., & TAYLOR, L. J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 1-11.