Direct comparison of myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance sequences with parallel acquisition

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1444-1451

  Lyne, Jonathan C ^a   Gatehouse, Peter D ^a   Assomull, Ravi G ^a   Smith, Gillian C ^a   Kellman, Peter ^b   Firmin, David N ^a   Pennell, Dudley J ^a  

^a ROYAL BROMPTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL HEART LUNG AND BLOOD INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

First pass; Gadolinium contrast agent; MRI; Myocardial perfusion

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STEADY STATE;

ARTIFACTS; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY VESSELS; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 37349071027     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21167     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation 2001;103:2230-2235.
2. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1445-1453.
3. Wu E, Judd RM, Vargas JD, et al. Visualisation of presence, location, and transmural extent of healed Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Lancet 2001;357:21-28.
4. Klein MA, Collier BD, Hellman RS, et al. Detection of chronic coronary artery disease: value of pharmacologically stressed, dynamically enhanced turbo fast low angle shot MR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;161:39-542.
5. Penzkofer H, Wintersperger BJ, Knez A, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion using multisection first-pass MRI and color-coded parameter maps: a comparison to 99mTcSesta MIBI SPECT and systolic myocardial wall thickening analysis. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:161-170.
6. Wilke N, Jerosch-Herold M, Wang Y, et al. Myocardial perfusion reserve: assessment with multisection, quantitative, first-pass MR imaging. Radiology 1997;204:373-384.
7. Jerosch-Herold M, Wilke N, Stillman AE. Magnetic resonance quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve with a Fermi function model for constrained deconvolution. Med Phys 1998;25:73-84.
8. Edelman RR, Li W. Contrast-enhanced echo-planar MR imaging of myocardial perfusion: preliminary study in humans. Radiology 1994;190:771-777.
9. Panting JR, Gatehouse PD, Yang GZ, et al. Echo-planar magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging: parametric analysis and comparison with thallium SPECT. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13: 192-200.
10. Ibrahim T, Nekolla SG, Schreiber K, et al. Assessment of coronary flow reserve: comparison between contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:864-870.
11. Ding S, Wolff SD, Epstein FH. Improved coverage in dynamic contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI using interleaved gradient echo EPI. Magn Reson Med 1998;39:514-519.
12. Fenchel M, Helber U, Simonetti OP, et al. Multlslice first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging: comparison of saturation recovery (SR)-true FISP-two-dimensional (2D) and SR-TurboFLASH-2D pulse sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:555-563.
13. Schreiber WG, Schmitt M, Kalden P, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion imaging using saturation-prepared TrueFISP. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:641-652.
14. Hunold P, Maderwald S, Eggebrecht H, et al. Steady state free precession sequences in myocardial first-pass perfusion MR imaging: comparison with TurboGRE imaging. Eur Radiol 2004;14:409-416.
15. Kostler H, Sandstede JJW, Lipke C, et al. Auto-SENSE perfusion imaging of the whole heart. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:702-708.
16. Kellman P, Derbyshire JA, Ageyman KO, et al. Extended coverage first pass perfusion using sliceinterleaved TSENSE. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:200-204.
17. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, et al. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952-962.
18. Kellman P, Epstein FH, McVeigh ER. Adaptive sensitivity encoding incorporating temporal filtering (TSENSE). Magn Reson Med 2001; 45:846-852.
19. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1202-1210.
20. Hunold P, Maderwald S, Ladd ME, et al. Parallel acquisition techniques in cardiac cine magnetic resonance imaging using TrueFISP sequences: comparison of image quality and artifacts. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:06-511.
21. Ingkanisorn WP, Rhoads KL, Syed MA, et al. Fat suppression improves image quality and diagnostic accuracy of EPI first pass perfusion. In: Proc 12th Scientific Meeting ISMRM 2004;312.
22. Deshpande VS, Shea SM, Chung YC, McCarthy RM, Finn JP, Li D. Breath-hold threedimensional true-FISP imaging of coronary arteries using asymmetric sampling. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;15: 473-478.
23. Deshpande VS, Chung YC, Zhang Q, Shea SM, Li D. Reduction of transient signal oscillations in true-FISP using a linear flip angle series magnetization preparation. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:151-157.
24. Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ. Handbook of MRI pulse sequences. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, MA; 2004:579-580.
25. Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ. Handbook of MRI pulse sequences. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, MA; 2004:585.
26. Kellman P, McVeigh ER. Image reconstruction in SNR units: a general method for SNR measurement. Magn Reson Med 2005;54: 1439-1447.
27. De Wilde JP, Lunt JA, Straughan K. Information in magnetic resonance images: evaluation of signal, noise and contrast. Med Biol Eng Comput 1997;35:259-265.
28. Haacke M, Brown R, Thompson M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging: physical principles and sequence design. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1999.
29. Elkington AG, Gatehouse PD, Cannell TM, et al. Comparison of hybrid echo-planar imaging and GRE myocardial perfusion cardiovascular MR imaging. Radiology 2005;235:237-243.
30. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105:539-542.
31. Storey P, Chen Q, Li W, et al. Band artifact due to bulk motion. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:1028-1036.
32. Di Bella EVR, Parker DL, Sinusas AJ. On the dark rim artifact on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI myocardial perfusion studies. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:1295-1299.
33. Wang Y, Moin K, Akinboboye O, et al. Myocardial first pass perfusion: steady-state free precession versus spoiled gradient echo and segmented echo planar imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:1123-1129.
34. Gebker R, Paetsch I, Neuss M, et al. Determinants of myocardial response in CMR perfusion imaging using Gd-BOPTA (Mulithance). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2005;7:565-572.
35. Muhling OM, Dickson ME, Zenovich A, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance first-pass perfusion analysis: inter- and intraobserver agreement. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2001;3:247-256.