Finding protein-protein interaction patterns by contact map matching

Genetics and Molecular Research

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 946-963

  Melo, R C ^a   Ribeiro, C ^a   Murray, C S ^a   Veloso, C J M ^a   Da Silveira, C H ^a   Neshich, G ^b   Meira Jr , W ^a   Carceroni, R L ^a   Santoro, M M ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

^b EMBRAPA CERRADOS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

BPTI; Contact maps; Protein protein interactions; Serine proteases

Indexed keywords

APROTININ; CHYMOTRYPSIN; KALLIKREIN; MATRIPTASE; PROTEIN; SERINE PROTEINASE; THROMBIN; TRYPSIN;

ALGORITHM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; IMAGE PROCESSING; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; APROTININ; BINDING SITES; CATTLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HYDROGEN BONDING; HYDROPHOBICITY; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; SERINE ENDOPEPTIDASES;

BOVINAE;

EID: 37349059302     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16765680     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Bartlett GJ, Porter CT, Borkakoti N and Thornton JM (2002). Analysis of catalytic residues in enzyme active sites. J. Mol. Biol. 324: 105-121.
2. Bobofchak KM, Pineda AO, Mathews FS and Di Cera E (2005). Energetic and structural consequences of perturbing Gly-193 in the oxyanion hole of serine proteases. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 25644-25650.
3. Brandsdal BO, Aqvist J and Smalas AO (2001). Computational analysis of binding of P1 variants to trypsin. Protein Sci. 10: 1584-1595.
4. Brandsdal BO, Smalas AO and Aqvist J (2006). Free energy calculations show that acidic P1 variants undergo large pKa shifts upon binding to trypsin. Proteins 64: 740-748.
5. Brown LG (1992). A survey of image registration techniques. ACM Comput. Surv. 24: 325-376.
6. Carter P and Wells JA (1988). Dissecting the catalytic triad of a serine protease. Nature 332: 564-568.
7. Czapinska H, Otlewski J, Krzywda S, Sheldrick GM, et al. (2000). High-resolution structure of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor with altered binding loop sequence. J. Mol. Biol. 295: 1237-1249.
8. de Melo RC, Lopes CE, Fernandes FA Jr, da Silveira CH, et al. (2006). A contact map matching approach to protein structure similarity analysis. Genet. Mol. Res. 5: 284-308.
9. Fernandes FA Jr, Lopes CER, Melo RC, Santoro MM, et al. (2004). An image-matching approach to protein similarity analysis. In: Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium of Computer Graphics and Image Processing, Curitiba, 17-24.
10. Fersht AR and Sperling J (1973). The charge relay system in chymotrypsin and chymotrypsinogen. J. Mol. Biol. 74: 137-149.
11. Hedstrom L (2002). Serine protease mechanism and specificity. Chem. Rev. 102: 4501-4524.
12. Helland R, Otlewski J, Sundheim O, Dadlez M, et al. (1999). The crystal structures of the complexes between bovine beta-trypsin and ten P1 variants of BPTI. J. Mol. Biol. 287: 923-942.
13. Hijikata-Okunomiya A, Okamoto S, Kikumoto R, Tamao Y, et al. (1987). Similarity and dissimilarity in the stereogeometry of the active sites of thrombin, trypsin, plasmin and glandular kallikrein. Thromb. Res. 45: 451-462.
14. Ito T, Chiba T, Ozawa R, Yoshida M, et al. (2001). A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 4569-4574.
15. Kraut J (1977). Serine proteases: structure and mechanism of catalysis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 46: 331-358.
16. Krowarsch D, Dadlez M, Buczek O, Krokoszynska I, et al. (1999). Interscaffolding additivity: binding of P1 variants of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor to four serine proteases. J. Mol. Biol. 289: 175-186.
17. Kruskal JB Jr (1956). On the shortest spanning subtree of a graph and the traveling salesman problem. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 7: 48-50.
18. Laskowski M Jr and Qasim MA (2000). What can the structures of enzyme-inhibitor complexes tell us about the structures of enzyme substrate complexes? Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1477: 324-337.
19. Laskowski M Jr, Qasim MA and Lu SM (2000). Interaction of standard mechanism, canonical protein inhibitors with serine proteinases. In: Protein-Protein Recognition, the Frontiers in Molecular Biology Series (Kleanthous C, ed.). Oxford University Press, New York, 228-279.
20. Maintz JB and Viergever MA (1998). A survey of medical image registration. Med. Image Anal. 2: 1-36.
21. Mancini AL, Higa RH, Oliveira A, Dominiquini F, et al. (2004). STING contacts: a web-based application for identification and analysis of amino acid contacts within protein structure and across protein interfaces. Bioinformatics 20: 2145-2147.
22. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T and Chothia C (1995). SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247: 536-540.
23. Perona JJ and Craik CS (1995). Structural basis of substrate specificity in the serine proteases. Protein Sci. 4: 337-360.
24. Rubner Y, Tomasi C and Guibas LJ (1998). A metric for distributions with applications to image databases. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Bombay, 59-66.
25. Sobolev V, Sorokine A, Prilusky J, Abola EE, et al. (1999). Automated analysis of interatomic contacts in proteins. Bioinformatics 15: 327-332.
26. Topf M, Várnai P and Richards WG (2002). Ab initio QM/MM dynamics simulation of the tetrahedral intermediate of serine proteases: insights into the active site hydrogen-bonding network. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124: 14780-14788.
27. Warshel A, Naray-Szabo G, Sussman F and Hwang JK (1989). How do serine proteases really work? Biochemistry 28: 3629-3637.
28. Wilmouth RC, Edman K, Neutze R, Wright PA, et al. (2001). X-ray snapshots of serine protease catalysis reveal a tetrahedral intermediate. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8: 689-694.
29. Yang AS and Honig B (1999). Sequence to structure alignment in comparative modeling using PrISM. Proteins 3: 66-72.
30. Yee DP and Dill KA (1993). Families and the structural relatedness among globular proteins. Protein Sci. 2: 884-899.