The S-ROM cementless femoral stem: History and literature review

Orthopedics

Volumn 28, Issue 9 SUPPL., 2005, Pages

  Spitzer, Andrew I ^a  

^a KERLAN JOBE ORTHOPAEDIC CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

BIOMECHANICS; BONE SCREW; CORTICAL BONE; FOLLOW UP; HIP DISEASE; LONG TERM CARE; OSTEOLYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; REOPERATION; REVIEW; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; WEIGHT BEARING;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMUR; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

EID: 25144474180     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Gorski JM. Modular noncemented total hip arthroplasty for congenital dislocation of the hip. Case report and design rationale. Clin Orthop. 1988; 228:110-116.
2. Bruce WJ, Rizkallah SM, Kwon YM, et al. A new technique of subtrochanteric shortening in total hip arthroplasty: surgical technique and results of 9 cases. J Arthroplasty. 2000; 15:617-626.
3. Cameron HU. Proximal femoral osteotomy in difficult revision hip surgery: how to revise the unrevisable. Contemp Orthop. 1989; 18:565.
4. Cameron HU. The use of a distally-fluted long-stem hip prosthesis in the correction of angular deformities of the femur. Contemp Orthop. 1990; 20:159.
5. Huo MH, Zatorski LE, Keggi KJ. Oblique femoral osteotomy in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1995; 10:319-327.
6. Masonis JL, Patel JV, Miu A, et al. Subtrochanteric shortening and derotational osteotomy in primary total hip arthroplasty for patients with severe hip dysplasia. J Arthroplasty. 2003; 18(3, Suppl 1):68-73.
7. Namba RS, Brick GW, Murray WR. Revision total hip arthroplasty with correctional femoral osteotomy in Paget's disease. J Arthroplasty. 1997; 12:591-595.
8. Cameron HU. The two to six year results with a proximally modular noncemented total hip replacement used in hip revisions. Clin Orthop. 1994; 198:47-53.
9. Chandler HP, Ayres DK, Tan RC, et al. Revision total hip replacement using the S-ROM femoral component. Clin Orthop. 1995; 319:130-140.
10. Chandler H, Clark J, Murphy S, et al. Reconstruction of major segmental loss of the proximal femur in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1994; 298:67-74.
11. Chandler HP. Use of allografts and prostheses in the reconstruction of failed total hip replacements. Orthopedics. 1992; 15:1207-1218.
12. Lee TQ, Danto MI, Kim WC. Initial stability comparison of modular hip implants in synthetic femurs. Orthopedics. 1998; 21:885-888.
13. Boggan RS. An in vitro comparison of surface strain patterns in cementless femoral arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty. 1993; 4:143-153.
14. Rosenthall L, Bobyn JD, Brooks CE. Temporal changes of periprosthetic bone density in patients with a modular noncemented femoral prosthesis. J Arthroplasty. 1999; 14:71-76.
15. Rosenthall L, Bobyn JD, Tanzer M. Bone densitometry: influence of prosthetic design and hydroxyapatite coating on regional adaptive bone remodelling. Int Orthop. 1999; 23:325-329.
16. Park YS, Lee JY, Yun SH, et al. Comparison of hydroxyapatite- and porous-coated stems in total hip replacement. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003; 74: 259-263.
17. Ohl MD, Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS, et al. Torsional fixation of a modular femoral hip component. Clin Orthop. 1993; 287:135-141.
18. Cook SD, Manley MT, Kester MA, et al. Torsional resistance and wear of a modular sleeve-stem hip system. Clin Mater. 1993; 12:153-158.
19. Bobyn J, Dujovne A, Krygier J, et al. Surface analysis of the taper junctions of retrieved and in vitro tested modular hip prostheses. In: Morrey B, ed. Biological, Material and Mechanical Considerations of Joint Replacement. New York, NY: Raven Press Ltd; 1993.
20. Bobyn JD, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ, et al. Concerns with modularity in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1994; 298:27-36.
21. Krygier JJ, Bobyn JD, Dujovne AR, et al. Strength, stability and wear analysis of titanium femoral hip prostheses tested in fatigue. Presented at: Transactions of the 4th World Biomaterials Congress; 1992; Berlin, Germany.
22. Krygier JJ, Dujovne AR, Bobyn JD. Fatigue behavior of titanium femoral hip prosthesis with proximal sleeve-stem modularity. J Appl Biomater. 1994; 5:195-201.
23. Postak PD, Polando G, Pugh JW, et al. A new method of fatigue testing for proximally supported femoral stems. Trans AAOS. 1990:320.
24. Bono JV, McCarthy JC, Lee J, et al. Fixation with a modular stem in revision total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2000; 49:131-139.
25. Tanzer M, Kantor S, Rosenthall L, et al. Femoral remodeling after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty with and without hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate coating: a prospective randomized trial. J Arthroplasty. 2001; 16:552-558.
26. Spitzer AI. Letter to the editor. J Arthroplasty. 2003; 18:539-540.
27. Cameron HU, Jung YB, Noiles DG, et al. Design features and early clinical results with a modular proximally fixed low bending stiffness uncemented total hip replacement. Scientific exhibit presented at: AAOS; 1998; Atlanta, Ga.
28. Cameron HU, Trick LW, Shepherd B, et al. An international multi-center study on thigh pain in total hip replacements. Scientific exhibit presented at: AAOS; 1990; New Orleans, La.
29. Cameron HU, Jung YB, Gruen TA. Noncemented proximally modular total hip replacement: a two to five year follow-up. Contemp Orthop. 1993; 26.
30. Cameron HU. The 3-6-year results of a modular noncemented low-bending stiffness hip implant: a preliminary study. J Arthroplasty. 1993; 8:239-243.
31. Cameron HU. Point-counterpoint: modularity in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1996; 11:332-334.
32. Cameron HU, Lee OB, Chou H. Total hip arthroplasty in patients with deficient bone stock and small femoral canals. J Arthroplasty. 2003; 18:35-40.
33. Christie MJ, DeBoer DK, Trick LW, et al. Primary total hip arthroplasty with use of the modular S-ROM prosthesis. Four to seven-year clinical and radiographic results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81:1707-1716.
34. Tanzer M, Chan S, Brooks CE, et al. Primary cementless total hip arthroplasty using a modular femoral component: a minimum 6-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2001; 16(8 Suppl 1):64-70.
35. Sporer SM, Obar RJ, Bernini PM. Primary total hip arthroplasty using a modular proximally coated prosthesis in patients older than 70: two to eight year results. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19:197-203.
36. Peters CL, Beck M, Dunn HK. Total hip arthroplasty in young adults after failed triple innominate osteotomy. J Arthroplasty. 2001; 16:188-195.
37. Kennon RE, Keggi JM, Wetmore RS, et al. Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85:39-48.
38. Jacobs M, Gorab R, Mattingly D, et al. Three- to six-year results with the Ultima metal-on-metal hip articulation for primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19(7 Suppl 2):48-53.
39. Cameron HU, Botsford DJ, Park YS. Influence of the Crowe rating on the outcome of total hip arthroplasty in congenital hip dysplasia. J Arthroplasty. 1996; 11:582-587.
40. Berend KR, Gunneson E, Urbaniak JR, et al. Hip arthroplasty after failed free vascularized fibular grafting for osteonecrosis in young patients. J Arthroplasty. 2003; 18:411-419.
41. Honl M, Dierk O, Gauck C, et al. Comparison of robotic-assisted and manual implantation of a primary total hip replacement. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85:1470-1478.
42. Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH, Fada RA, et al. Stem modularity: rarely necessary in primary total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2002; 25:1385-1387.
43. Mattingly D, McCarthy J, Bierbaum BE, et al. Revising the deficient proximal femur. Scientific exhibit presented at: AAOS; 1991; Anaheim, Calif.
44. McCarthy JC, Mattingly D, Turner RH, et al. Revision of the deficient femur with a modular femoral component. Orthop Trans. 1993; 17:966.
45. Smith JA, Dunn HK, Manaster BJ. Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty. 2- to 5-year results with a modular titanium alloy stem. J Arthroplasty. 1997; 12:194-201.
46. Christie MJ, DeBoer DK, Tingstad EM, et al. Clinical experience with a modular noncemented femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty: 4- to 7-year results. J Arthroplasty. 2000; 15:840-848.
47. Bolognesi MP, Pietrobon R, Clifford PE, et al. Comparison of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve and a porous-coated sleeve with a modular revision hip stem. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86:2720-2725.
48. Cameron HU. The long-term success of modular proximal fixation stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17(4 Suppl 1):138-141.
49. Buly RL. The S-ROM stem for revision total hip arthroplasty. Techniques in Orthopaedics. 2001; 16:268-278.
50. Jones RE. Modular revision stems in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2004; 420:142-147.
51. Cameron HU. Orthopaedic crossfire - Stem modularity is unnecessary in revision total hip arthroplasty: in opposition. J Arthroplasty. 2003; 18(3 Suppl 1):101-103.