Review of the methods to prevent femoral arteriotomy complications and contrast nephropathy in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization: Cardiac catheterization and care approaches in Turkey

Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 452-458

  Altiok, Meral ^a   Yurtsever, Sabire ^a   Kuyurtar, Funda ^a  

^a MERSIN UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Arterial closure devices; Cardiac catheterization; Complications; Contrast nephropathy; Head of bed elevation; Pressure devices; Sandbag; Time of mobilization

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; KIDNEY DISEASE; METHODOLOGY; MONITORING; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT EDUCATION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; TURKEY (REPUBLIC);

CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; KIDNEY DISEASES; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; TURKEY;

EID: 37349039648     PISSN: 08894655     EISSN: 15505049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.JCN.0000297389.03700.51     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. American Heart Association Web site. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2006 update medical procedures, facilities and costs. http://www. americanheart.org/statistics/medical.html. Accessed April 20, 2006.
2. Turkish Cardiology Society guidelines for competency in interventional cardiology. http://www.tkd.org.tr/kilavuz/girisimsel_kilavuz. Accessed April 20, 2006.
3. Ammann P, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Angehrn W, Roelli H, Sagmeister M, Rickli H. Procedural complications following diagnostic coronary angiography are related to the operator's experience and the catheter size. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003;59:13-18.
4. Franch RH, Douglas JS, King SB, Kern MJ. Cardiac catheterization, coronary arteriography, and coronary blood flow and pressure measurements [translation: Ö. Batukan]. In: Fuster V, Alexander RW, O'Rourke RA, eds. Hurst's the Heart. Istanbul, Turkey: And Danişmanlýk and Yayincilik; 2002:479Y525.
5. Grossman W, Baim DS. Cardiac Catheterization, Angiography and Intervention. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febriger; 1991.
6. Binak K. Cardiac catheterization and arteriography. In: Binak K, İlerigelen B, Güzelsoy D, Okay T, eds. Technical Cardiology. Istanbul, Turkey: Form Reklam Hizmetleri; 2001:253-331.
7. Chandrasekar B, Doucet S, Bilodeau L, et al. Complications of cardiac catheterization in the current era: a singlecentered experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001;52:289Y295.
8. Kelm M, Perings SM, Jax T, et al. Incidence and clinical outcome of iatrogenic femoral arteriovenous fistulas. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:491-497.
9. Deelstra MH, Jacobson C. Cardiac catheterization. In: Woods SL, Froelicher ESS, Motzer SU, Bridges EJ, eds. Cardiac Nursing. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005:459-471.
10. Zhou T, Zhou SH, Shen XQ, et al. Peripheral vascular complications after the cardiac catheterization. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2007;32:156-159.
11. Ates M, Sahin S, Konuralp C, et al. Evaluation of risk factors associated with femoral pseudoaneurysms after cardiac catheterization. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:520-524.
12. Fuchs S, Stabile E, Kinnaird TD, et al. Stroke complicating percutaneous coronary interventions: incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications. Circulation. 2002;106:86-91.
13. Leker RR, Pollak A, Abramsky O, Ben-Hur T. Abundance of left hemispheric embolic strokes complicating coronary angiography and PTCA. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;66:116-117.
14. Maddox TG. Adverse reactions to contrast material: recognition, prevention, and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2002;7:1229-1234.
15. Schrader R. Contrast material-induced renal failure: an overview. J Interv Cardiol. 2005;18:417-423.
16. O'Brien C, Recker D. How to remove a femoral sheath. AJN. 1992;92:34-37.
17. Simon A, Bumgarner B, Clark K, et al. Manuel versus mechanical compression for femoral artery hemostasis after cardiac catheterization. Am J Crit Care. 1998;7:308-313.
18. Juran NB, Rouse CL, Smith DD, et al. Nursing interventions to decrease bleeding at the femoral access site after percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Crit Care. 1999;8:303-313.
19. Christensen BV, Manion RV, Lacarella CL, et al. Vascular complications after angiography with and without the use of sandbags. Nurs Res. 1998;47:51-53.
20. Lehmann KG, Ferris ST, Heath-Lange SJ. Maintenance of hemostasis after invasive cardiac procedures: implications for outpatient catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:444-451.
21. Lehmann KG, Heath-Lange SJ, Ferris ST. Randomized comparison of hemostasis techniques after invasive cardiovascular procedures. Am Heart J. 1999;138:1118-1125.
22. Altiok MG, En0 N, Yiǧit Z. Effect of four different care methods on complications after cardiac catheterization. XXth Annual Congress of the Turkish Society of Cardiology; November 27-30, 2004; Antalya-Turkey [p480].
23. McCabe PJ, McPherson LA, Lohse CM, et al. Evaluation of nursing care after diagnostic coronary angiography. Am J Crit Care. 2001;10:330-340.
24. Botti MBA, Williamson B, Steen K, et al. The effect of pressure bandaging on complications and comfort in patients undergoing coronary angiography: a multicenter randomized trial. Heart Lung. 1998;27:360-373.
25. Sulzbach LM, Munro BH, Hirshfeld JW. A randomized clinical trial of the effect of bed position after PTCA. Am J Crit Care. 1995;4:221-226.
26. Coyne C, Baier W, Perra B, Sherer BK. Controlled trial of backrest elevation after coronary angiography. Am J Crit Care. 1994;3:282-288.
27. Chair SY, Taylor-Piliae RE, Lam G, Chan S. Effect of positioning on back pain after coronary angiography. J Adv Nurs. 2003;42:470-478.
28. Yilmaz GY, Memiş S. Determination of factors affecting and frequency of bleeding complications after coronary angiography. Turk J Intensive Care Nurs. 2000;4:55-62.
29. Chamberlin JR, Lardi AB, McKeever LS, et al. Use of vascular sealing devices (VasoSeal and Perclose) versus assisted manual compression (FemoStop) in transcatheter coronary interventions requiring abciximab (ReoPro). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999;47:143-147.
30. Applegate RJ, Grabarczyk MA, Little WC, et al. Vascular closure devices in patients treated with anticoagulation and IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors during percutaneous revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:78-83.
31. Hogan-Miller E, Rustad D, Sendelbach S, Goldenberg I. Effects of three methods of femoral site immobilization on bleeding and comfort after coronary angiogram. Am J Crit Care. 1995;4:143-148.
32. Christensen V, Lacarella CL, Manion RV, et al. Sandbags do not prevent complications after catheterization [abstract]. Circulation. 1994;90(suppl):205.
33. Boonbaichaiyapruck S, Hutayanon P, Chanthanamatta P, et al. Groin dressing after catheterization. Comparison between light dressing with thin transparent tape (Tegaderm) and conventional tight/pressure dressing with an elastic adhesive bandage (Tenoplast) [abstract]. J Med Assoc Thai. 2001;84:1721-1728.
34. Botti MBA, Williamson B, Steen K. Coronary angiography observations: evidence-based or ritualistic practice. Heart Lung. 2001;30:138-145.
35. Haas K, Quinlan B. Preventing pseudoaneurysms following femoral cannulization. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 1999;18:24-28.
36. Jones C, Holcomb E, Rohrer T. Femoral artery pseudoaneurysm after invasive procedures. Crit Care Nurse. 1995;15:47-51.
37. Bogart MA. Time to hemostasis: a comparison of manual versus mechanical compression of the femoral artery. Am J Crit Care. 1995;4:149-156.
38. Keeling A, Taylor V, Nordt LA, et al. Reducing time in bed after cardiac catheterization (TIBS II). Am J Crit Care. 1996;5:277-281.
39. Jones BT, McCutcheon H. Effectiveness of mechanical compression devices in attaining hemostasis after femoral sheath removal. Am J Crit Care. 2002;11:155-162.
40. Benson LM, Wunderly D, Perry B, et al. Determining best practice: comparison of three methods of femoral sheath removal after cardiac interventional procedures. Heart Lung. 2005;34:115-121.
41. Baim DS, Knopf WD, Hinohara T, et al. Suture-mediated closure of the femoral access site after cardiac catheterization: result of the suture to ambulate and discharge (STAND I and STAND II) trials. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85:864-869.
42. Duffin DC, Muhlestein JB, Allison SB, et al. Femoral arterial puncture management after percutaneous coronary procedures: a comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction between manual compression and two different vascular closure devices. J Invasive Cardiol. 2001;13:354-362.
43. Rickli H, Unterweger M, S[tch G, et al. Comparison of costs and safety of a suture-mediated closure device with conventional manual compression after interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002;57:297-302.
44. Koreny M, Reidmuller E, Nikfardjam M, et al. Puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;291:350-357.
45. Juergens CP, Leung DYC, Crozier JA, et al. Patient tolerance and resource utilization associated with an arterial closure versus an external compression devices after percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004;63:166-170.
46. Mehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, et al. A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1393-1399.
47. Gleeson TG, Bulugahapitiya S. Contrast-induced nephropathy. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1673-1689.
48. Maeder M, Klein M, Fehr T, Rickli H. Contrast nephropathy: review focusing on prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1763-1771.
49. Trivedi HS, Moore H, Nasr S, et al. A randomized prospective trial to assess the role of saline hydration on the development of contrast nephrotoxicity. Nephron Clin Pract. 2003;93:29-34.
50. Mueller C, Buerkle G, Buettner HJ, et al. Prevention of contrast media-associated nephropathy: randomized comparison of 2 hydration regimens in 1620 patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:329-336.
51. Oudemans-van Straaten HM. Strategies to prevent contrast nephropathy [abstract]. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2005;53:445-463.
52. Scriver V, Crove J, Wilkinson A, Meadowcroft C. A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of exercise and/or alternating air mattress in the control of back pain after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Heart Lung. 1994;23:308-316.
53. Chair SY, Li KM, Wong SW. Factors that affect back pain among Hong Kong Chinese patients after cardiac catheterization. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2004;3:279-285.
54. Pooler-Lunse C, Barkman A, Bock BF. Effects of modified positioning and mobilization on back pain and delayed bleeding in patients who had received heparin and undergone angiography: a pilot study. Heart Lung. 1996;25:117-123.
55. Rein A, Zhu Y, Parkhhurst M, et al. Positioning post-outpatient cardiac catheterization [abstract]. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 1995;10:4-10.
56. Logemann T, Luetmer P, Kaliebe J, Olson K, Murdock DK. Two versus six hours of bed rest following left-sided cardiac catheterization and a meta-analysis of early ambulation trials. Am J Cardiol. 1999;84:486-488.
57. Tagney J, Lackie D. Bed-rest post-femoral arterial sheath removal - what is safe practice? A clinical audit. Nurs Crit Care. 2005;10:167-173.
58. Vlasic W, Almond D, Massel D. Reducing bedrest following arterial puncture for coronary interventional procedures - impact on vascular complications: the BAC trial. J Invasive Cardiol. 2001;13:788-792.
59. Doyle BJ, Konz BA, Lennon RJ, Bresnahan JF, Rihal CS, Ting HH. Ambulation 1 hour after diagnostic cardiac catheterization: a prospective study of 1009 procedures. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:1537-1540.
60. Gall S, Tarique A, Natarajan A, Zaman A. Rapid ambulation after coronary angiography via femoral artery access: a prospective study of 1,000 patients. J Invasive Cardiol. 2006;18:106-108.