Determining best practice: Comparison of three methods of femoral sheath removal after cardiac interventional procedures

Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 115-121

  Benson, Linda McAlpine ^a   Wunderly, Douglas ^b   Perry, Benjamin ^c   Kabboord, Jan ^a   Wenk, Tamara ^a   Birdsall, Bonnie ^a   Vanderbos, Laurie ^a   Roach, Valarie ^a   Goole, Rebecca ^a   Crippen, Carolyn ^a   Nyirenda, Themba ^a   Rumsey, Lisa ^a   Manguba, Grace ^a  

^a BRONSON METHODIST HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Advanced Cardiac Healthcare PC   (United States)

^c Heart Center for Excellence   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTITHROMBOCYTIC AGENT; FIBRINOGEN RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST; HEPARIN;

ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPRESSION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DEVICE REMOVAL; DRUG UTILIZATION; FEMALE; FEMUR ARTERY SHEATH REMOVAL; GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 20044369906     PISSN: 01479563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2004.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. S.M. Petula, S. Hudacek The Femostop compression device utilization guidelines for the critical care nurse Dimens Crit Care Nurs 5 1995 259 264
2. N.B. Juran, D.D. Smith, C.L. Rouse, S.A. DeLuca, M. Rund SANDBAG Nursing Coordinators at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation Survey of current practice patterns for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty Am J Crit Care 5 1996 442 448
3. H.J. Semler Transfemoral catheterization mechanical versus manual control of bleeding Radiology 154 1985 234 235
4. M. Bogart Time to hemostasis a comparison of manual versus mechanical compression of the femoral artery Am J Crit Care 4 1995 149 156
5. S.L. Almany, D.R. Cragg, S. Lazzara Use of a compressive leverage apparatus versus manual pressure in achieving hemostasis after invasive procedure J Am Coll Cardiol 21 1993 425 (abstr)
6. P.T. Rudisill, L.B. Williams, S. Craig, P. Schopp Study of mechanical versus manual/mechanical compression following various interventional cardiology procedures J Cardiovasc Nurs 11 1997 15 22
7. K. Sridhar, D. Fischman, S. Goldberg, A. Zalewski, P. Walinsky, D. Porter Peripheral vascular complications after intracoronary stent placement prevention by use of a pneumatic compression device Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 9 1996 224 229
8. T. Jones, H. McCutcheon Effectiveness of mechanical compression devices in attaining hemostasis after femoral sheath removal Am J Crit Care 11 2002 155 162
9. J.E. Nordrehaug, N.A.F. Chronos, K.A. Priestley, N.P. Buller, J. Foran Randomized evaluation of an inflatable femoral artery compression device J Intervent Cardiol 9 1996 381 387
10. J.B. Pracyk, T.C. Wall, J.P. Longabaugh A randomized trial of vascular hemostasis techniques to reduce femoral vascular complications after coronary intervention Am J Cardiol 81 1998 970 976
11. G. Homuth Relationship of methods for removal of femoral sheaths to the incidence of hematomas and patient comfort. Master's thesis 1990 Northern Illinois University DeKalb, IL
12. McCabe P, McPherson LA, Lohse CM, Weaver AL. Evaluation of nursing care after diagnostic coronary angiography. Am J Crit Care 200:10:330-40.
13. C. Jennison, B.W. Turnbull Group sequential methods with applications to clinical trials 2000 Chapman and Hall London 319
14. B.L. Palmer, S. Gantt, M. Lawrence, M.H. Rajab, G.J. Dehmer Effectiveness and safety of manual hemostasis facilitated by the Syvek patch with one hour of bed rest after coronary angiography using six-french catheters Am J Cardiol 93 2004 96 97