Effectiveness of mechanical compression devices in attaining hemostasis after femoral sheath removal

American Journal of Critical Care

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 155-162

  Jones, Tina ^a,b   McCutcheon, Helen ^b  

^a ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; META ANALYSIS; NURSING; PRESSURE; PUNCTURE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TIME;

FEMORAL ARTERY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEMOSTATIC TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; PRESSURE; PUNCTURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0036519033     PISSN: 10623264     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2002.11.2.155     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Schickel S, Cronin SN, Mize A, Voelker C. Removal of femoral sheaths by registered nurses: issues and outcomes. Crit Care Nurse. April 1996;16:32-36.
2. Lehmann K, Ferris S, Heath Lange S. Maintenance of hemostasis after invasive cardiac procedures: implications for outpatient catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:444-451.
3. Peet GI, McGrath MA, Brunt JH, Hilton JD. Femoral arterial sheath removal after PTCA: a cross-Canada survey. Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 1995;6:13-19.
4. Pracyk JB, Wall TC, Longabaugh JP, et al. A randomized trial of vascular hemostasis techniques to reduce femoral vascular complications after coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81:970-976.
5. Gibbs H, Sanborn T. Percutaneous vascular hemostasis devices for arterial sealing after interventional procedures. In: Topol E, ed. Textbook of Interventional Cardiology. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1994:629-637.
6. Simon AW. Use of a mechanical pressure device for hemostasis following cardiac catheterization. Am J Crit Care. 1994;3:62-64.
7. Spies JB, Berlin L. Complications of femoral artery puncture. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170:9-11.
8. Jones C, Holcomb E, Rohrer T. Femoral artery pseudoaneurysm after invasive procedures. Crit Care Nurse. August 1995;15:47-51.
9. Kussmaul WG III, Buchbinder M, Whitlow PL, et al. Rapid arterial hemostasis and decreased access site complications after cardiac catheterization and angioplasty: results of a randomized trial of a novel hemostatic device. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:1685-1692.
10. Semler HJ. Transfemoral catheterization: mechanical versus manual control of bleeding. Radiology. 1985;154:234-235.
11. Beyer-Enke SA, Soldner J, Zeitler E. Immediate sealing of arterial puncture site following femoropopliteal angioplasty: a prospective randomized trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1996;19:406-410.
12. Nordrehaug JE, Chronos NAF, Priestley KA, Buller NP, Foran J. Randomized evaluation of an inflatable femoral artery compression device. J Intervent Cardiol. 1996;9:381-387.
13. Ernst J, Kloos R, Schrader R, et al. Immediate sealing of arterial puncture sites after catheterization and PTCA using a vascular hemostasis device with collagen: an international registry [abstract]. Circulation. 1991;84(suppl II):68.
14. Gibbs J, Slade A, Nordrehaug J, et al. The use of a collagen plug for femoral arterial haemostasis following cardiac catheterization: single institution experience [abstract]. Eur Heart J. 1992;13(suppl):428.
15. Ernst S, Gin M, Mast G, et al. Percutaneous application of collagen seal femoral arterial puncture sites in fully anticoagulated patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19(suppl A):217A.
16. Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Hayes RB. Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:376-380.
17. Deeks J, Glanville J, Sheldon T. Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research on Effectiveness: CRD Guidelines for Carrying Out or Commissioning Reviews. York, United Kingdom: National Health System Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, The University of York, York Publishing Service Ltd; 1996. CDS Report No. 4.
18. Jones T, Evans D. Conducting a systematic review. Aust Crit Care. May 2000;13:66-71.
19. Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ. 1994;309:1286-1291.
20. Quality of Care and Health Outcomes Committee. Guidelines for the Development and Implementation of Clinical Guidelines. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service; 1995.
21. Oxman A. The Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. Oxford, England: The Cochrane Collaboration; 1994.
22. Bogart M. Time to hemostasis: a comparison of manual versus mechanical compression of the femoral artery. Am J Crit Care. 1995;4:149-156.
23. Gibson C. A Comparison of Compression Devices for Femoral Artery Haemostasis [master's thesis]. Spokane, Wash: Gonzaga University; 1996.
24. Homuth G. Relationship of Methods for Removal of Femoral Sheaths to the Incidence of Hematomas and Patient Comfort [master's thesis]. De Kalb, Ill: Northern Illinois University; 1990.
25. Janerot-Sjoberg B, Broqvist M, Fransson SG. Femoral artery haemostasis with a pneumatic compression device versus a clamp after coronary angiography. Scand Cardiovasc J. 1998;32:281-284.
26. Rudisill PT, Williams LB, Craig S, Schopp P. Study of mechanical versus manual/mechanical compression following various interventional cardiology procedures. J Cardiovasc Nurs. January 1997;11:15-21.
27. Simon A, Bumgarner B, Clark K, Israel S. Manual versus mechanical compression for femoral artery hemostasis after cardiac catheterization. Am J Crit Care. 1998;7:308-313.
28. Sridhar K, Fischman D, Goldberg S, et al. Peripheral vascular complications after intracoronary stent placement: prevention by use of a pneumatic vascular compression device. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1996;39:224-229.