Contact allergy - Diagnosing and treatment;Alergia kontaktowa - Diagnostyka i postȩpowanie

Alergia Astma Immunologia

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 109-127

  Śpiewak, Radosław ^a,b  

^a Instytut Dermatologii   (Poland)

^b NONE   (Poland)

Author keywords

Allergic contact dermatitis; Allergic contact eczema; Contact allergy; Diagnosis; Patch test; Treatment

Indexed keywords

BEDICORT G; BETAMETHASONE; BETAMETHASONE DIPROPIONATE; BETAMETHASONE SODIUM PHOSPHATE; BETAMETHASONE VALERATE; BUDESONIDE; CLOBETASOL PROPIONATE; CORTICOSTEROID; DEXAMETHASONE; DIFLUCORTOLONE VALERATE; DIPROGENTA; ELOSONE; FLUMETASONE PIVALATE; FLUOCINONIDE; FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE; GLUCOCORTICOID; HYDROCORTISONE; HYDROCORTISONE BUTYRATE; KERATOLYTIC AGENT; METHYLPREDNISOLONE; METHYLPREDNISOLONE ACEPONATE; MOMETASONE FUROATE; TRIAMCINOLONE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CONTACT ALLERGY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; IMMUNOMODULATION; PATCH TEST; PHOTOTHERAPY; QUALITY OF LIFE; REMISSION; REVIEW;

EID: 37349031420     PISSN: 14273101     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (151)

1. Hjorth N. The development of the patch testing procedure and working for consistency. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989; 21: 855-7.
2. Johansson SG, Bieber T, Dahl R i wsp. Revised nomenclature for allergy for global use: Report of the Nomenclature Review Committee of the World Allergy Organization, October 2003. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004; 113: 832-6.
3. Akhavan A, Alghaithi K, Rabach M i wsp. Allergic contact stomatitis. Dermatitis. 2006; 17: 88-90.
4. Pardo J, Rodriguez-Serna M, De La CJ, Fortea JM. Allergic contact stomatitis due to manganese in a dental prosthesis. Contact Dermatitis. 2004; 50: 41.
5. Estlander T, Kanerva L, Kari O i wsp. Occupational conjunctivitis associated with type IV allergy to methacrylates. Allergy. 1996; 51: 56-9.
6. Caraffini S, Assalve D, Stingeni L, Lisi P. Allergic contact conjunctivitis and blepharitis from tobramycin. Contact Dermatitis. 1995; 32:186-7.
7. Ricer RE, Guthrie RM. Allergic vaginitis, a possibly new syndrome. A case report. J Reprod.Med. 1988; 33: 781-3.
8. Quan M. Vaginitis: meeting the clinical challenge. Clin Cornerstone. 2000; 3: 36-47.
9. Jensen CS, Menne T, Johansen JD. Systemic contact dermatitis after oral exposure to nickel: a review with a modified meta-analysis. Contact Dermatitis. 2006; 54: 79-86.
10. Cusano F, Ferrara G, Crisman G i wsp. Clinicopathologic features of systemic contact dermatitis from ethylenediamine in cetirizine and levocetirizine. Dermatology. 2006; 213: 353-5.
11. Śpiewak R, Brewczyński PZ. Powikłania po stabilizacji płyta̧ metalowa̧ złamania kości udowej u chorej z alergia̧ kontaktowa̧ na chrom, nikiel i kobalt. Pol Tyg Lek. 1993; 48: 651-2.
12. Krȩcisz B, Kieć-Świerczyńska M, Bakowicz-Mitura K. Allergy to metals as a cause of orthopedic implant failure. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2006; 19: 178-80.
13. Rahilly G, Price N. Nickel allergy and orthodontics. J Orthod. 2003; 30: 171-4.
14. Abdallah HI, Balsara RK, O'Riordan AC. Pacemaker contact sensitivity: clinical recognition and management. Ann Thorac.Surg. 1994; 57: 1017-8.
15. Skoet R, Tollund C, Bloch-Thomsen PE. Epoxy contact dermatitis due to pacemaker compounds. Cardiology. 2003; 99: 112.
16. Koster R, Vieluf D, Kiehn M i wsp. Nickel and molybdenum contact allergies in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis. Lancet. 2000; 356:1895-7.
17. Helgesen AL, Austad J. Contact urticaria from aluminium and nickel in the same patient. Contact Dermatitis. 1997; 37: 303-4.
18. Guerra L, Rogkakou A, Massacane P i wsp. Role of contact sensitization in chronic urticaria. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007; 56: 88-90.
19. Malo JL, Cartier A,Gagnon G i wsp. Isolated late asthmatic reaction due to nickel sulphate without antibodies to nickel. Clin Allergy. 1985;15: 95-9.
20. Niordson AM. Nickel sensitivity as a cause of rhinitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1981; 7: 273-4.
21. Schäfer T, Böhler E, Ruhdorfer S i wsp. Epidemiology of contact allergy in adults. Allergy. 2001; 56: 1192-6.
22. Śpiewak R. Allergische Kontaktdermatitis im Kindesalter. Eine Übersicht und Meta-Analyse. Allergologie. 2002; 25: 374-81.
23. Sławeta G, Kieć-Świerczyńska M. Alergia kontaktowa u młodzieży kończa̧cej szkołȩ podstawowa̧. Przegl Dermatol. 1999; 86: 143-7.
24. Śpiewak R. Atopy and contact hypersensitivity: a reassessment of the relationship using objective measures. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005; 95: 61-5.
25. Uter W, Hegewald J, Aberer W i wsp. The European standard series in 9 European countries, 2002/2003 - first results of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies. Contact Dermatitis. 2005; 53: 136-45.
26. Modjtahedi BS, Modjtahedi SP, Maibach HI. The sex of the individual as a factor in allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 2004; 50: 53-9.
27. Śpiewak R, Piȩtowska J. Nikiel - alergen wyja̧tkowy. Od struktury atomu do regulacj i prawnych. Alergol Immunol. 2006; 3: 58-62.
28. Aberer W. Vaccination despite thimerosal sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis. 1991; 24: 6-10.
29. Aberer W, Kränke B. Thimerosal is a frequent sensitizer but is not in the standard series. Contact Dermatitis. 1995; 32: 367-8.
30. Straff W, Schnuch A. Umweltbedingte Kontaktallergien. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2006; 49: 796-803.
31. Śpiewak R. Dermatozy zawodowe w rolnictwie: epidemiologia, etiopatogeneza, czynniki ryzyka. Wydawnictwo Czelej, Lublin 2002.
32. Mortz CG, Lauritsen JM, Bindslev-Jensen C, Andersen KE. Contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis in adolescents: prevalence measures and associations. The Odense Adolescence Cohort Study on Atopic Diseases and Dermatitis (TOACS). Acta Derm Venereol. 2002; 82: 352-8.
33. Braun-Falco O, Plewig G, Wolff HH, Winkelmann RK. Dermatology. Springer, Berlin 1991: 331.
34. Bjorkner BE. Industrial airborne dermatoses. Dermatol Clin. 1994;12: 501-9.
35. Śpiewak R. Monitoring pyłkowy - jego znaczenie kliniczne w praktyce lekarza dermatologa i alergologa. Przewodnik Lekarza. 2001; 3: 128-31.
36. Dooms-Goossens A, Deleu H. Airborne contact dermatitis: an update. Contact Dermatitis. 1991; 25: 211-7.
37. Huygens S, Goossens A. An update on airborne contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 2001; 44: 1-6.
38. Rudzki E, Rebandel P. Nowy rodzaj alergenów kontaktowych: alergeny lotne. Przegl Dermatol. 1988; 75: 260-5.
39. Śpiewak R, Skórska C, Dutkiewicz J. Occupational airborne contact dermatitis caused by thyme dust. Contact Dermatitis. 2001; 44: 235-9.
40. Kanerva L, Alanko K, Jolanki R, Estlander T. Laboratory assistant's occupational allergic airborne contact dermatitis from nickel presenting as rosacea. Eur J Dermatol 1999; 9: 397-8.
41. Anibarro PC, Brenosa BG, Madoz SE i wsp. Occupational airborne allergic contact dermatitis from disperse dyes. Contact Dermatitis. 2000; 43: 44.
42. Garrido FS, Arroabarren AE, Garcia Figueroa BE i wsp. Direct and airborne contact dermatitis from propolis in beekeepers. Contact Dermatitis. 2004; 50: 320-1.
43. Kieć-Świerczyńska M, Krȩcisz B. Occupational airborne allergic contact dermatitis from mesna. Contact Dermatitis. 2003; 48: 171.
44. Śpiewak R, Dutkiewicz J. Occupational contact dermatitis to Phaseolus vulgaris in a farmer - a case report. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2000; 7: 55-9.
45. Śpiewak R, Dutkiewicz J. Occupational airborne and hand dermatitis to hop (Humulus lupulus) with non-occupational relapses. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2002; 9: 249-52.
46. Śpiewak R, Skórska C, Góra A i wsp. Young farmers with cellular reactivity to airborne microbes suffer more frequently from work-related skin symptoms and allergic dermatitis. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2001; 8: 255-9.
47. Gupta AK, Madzia SE, Batra R. Etiology and management of seborrheic dermatitis. Dermatology. 2004; 208: 89-93.
48. Schnuch A, Geier J, Uter W i wsp. National rates and regional differences in sensitization to allergens of the standard series. Population-adjusted frequencies of sensitization (PAFS) in 40,000 patients from a multicenter study (IVDK). Contact Dermatitis. 1997; 37: 200-9.
49. Śpiewak R, Dutkiewicz J. A farmer's occupational airborne contact dermatitis masqueraded by coexisting rosacea: delayed diagnosis and legal acknowledgement. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2004; 11: 329-33.
50. Śpiewak R. Patch tests with popular topical antifungal drugs in eczema patients. Int Rev Allergol Clin Immunol. 2000; 6:136-8.
51. Heule F, Tahapary GJ, Bello CR, van Joost T. Delayed-type hypersensitivity to contact allergens in psoriasis. A clinical evaluation. Contact Dermatitis. 1998; 38: 78-82.
52. Śpiewak R. Köbnerizing occupational contact allergy to thiuram in a farmer with psoriasis. Contact Dermatitis. 2004; 51: 214-5.
53. Belsito DV. The diagnostic evaluation, treatment, and prevention of allergic contact dermatitis in the new millennium. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;105: 409-20.
54. Bourke J, Coulson I, English J. Guidelines for care of contact dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2001;145: 877-85.
55. Mowad CM. Patch testing: pitfalls and performance. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006; 6: 340-4.
56. Lachapelle JM, Maibach HI. Patch testing and prick testing. A practical guide. Springer; Berlin 2003: 1-189.
57. Śpiewak R. Problemy interpretacyjne w alergologicznych testach płatkowych: analiza wyników badań 196 chorych z podejrzeniem wyprysku kontaktowego. Int Rev Allergol Clin Immunol. 1997; 3(Suppl 2): 36.
58. Jonker MJ, Bruynzeel DP. The outcome of an additional patch-test reading on days 6 or 7. Contact Dermatitis. 2000; 42: 330-5.
59. Rajagopalan R, Anderson RT, Sarma S i wsp. An economic evaluation of patch testing in the diagnosis and management of allergic contact dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermal 1998; 9: 149-54.
60. Nethercott JR, Holness DL. Validity of patch test screening trays in the evaluation of patients with allergic contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989;21: 568.
61. Brasch J, Henseler T, Aberer W i wsp. Reproducibility of patch tests. A multicenter study of synchronous left-versus nght-sided patch tests by the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group J Am Acad Dermatol. 1994; 31: 584-91.
62. Mimesh S, Pratt M. Allergic contact dermatitis from corticosteroids: reproducibility of patch testing and correlation with intradermal testing. Dermatitis. 2006;17:137-42.
63. Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology;American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. Contact dermatitis: a practice parameter. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006; 97(3 Suppl 2): S1-38.
64. Trautmann A. Allergisches Kontaktekzem. W: Allergiediagnose/ Allergietherapie. Georg Thieme, Stuttgart 2006: 130-155.
65. Jensen CD, Paulsen E, Andersen KE. Retrospective evaluation of the consequence of alleged patch test sensitization. Contact Dermatitis. 2006; 55: 30-5.
66. Menne T, Dooms-Goossens A, Wahlberg JE i wsp. Flow large a proportion of contact sensitivities are diagnosed with the European standard series? Contact Dermatitis 1992; 26: 201-2.
67. Sherertz EF, Swartz SM. Is the screening patch test tray still worth using? J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993; 29:1057-8.
68. Rudzki E, Kleniewska D. Polski zestaw alergenów kontaktowych. Przegl Dermatol. 1970; 57: 751-4.
69. Tosti A, Vincenzi C, Peluso AM. Accidental diagnosis of aluminium sensitivity with Finn Chambers. Contact Dermatitis 1990; 23: 48-9.
70. Veien NK, Hattel T, Justesen O, NorholmA. Aluminium allergy. Contact Dermatitis. 1986;15: 295-7.
71. Veien NK. Routine patch testing withAlCl3. Contact Dermatitis. 1996; 35:126.
72. Lachapelle JM, Antoine JL. Problems raised by the simultaneous reproducibility of positive allergic patch test reactions in man. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989; 21: 850-4.
73. Lazarov A, David M, Abraham D, Trattner A. Comparison of reactivity to allergens using the TRUE Test and IQ chamber system. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;56:140-5.
74. TRUE Test Study Group. Comparative multicenter studies with TRUE Test and Finn Chambers in eight Swedish hospitals. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989; 21: 846-9.
75. van der Valk PG, Devos SA, Coenraads PJ. Evidence-based diagnosis in patch testing. Contact Dermatitis. 2003; 48:121-5.
76. Diepgen TL, Coenraads PJ. Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of patch testing: the more you test, the more you get? ESCD Working Party on Epidemiology. Contact Dermatitis. 2000; 42: 315-7.
77. Bruze M, Isaksson M, Edman B i wsp. A study on expert reading of patch test reactions: inter-individual accordance. Contact Dermatitis. 1995; 32: 331-7.
78. van Strien GA, Korstanje MJ. Site variations in patch test responses on the back. Contact Dermatitis. 1994, 31: 95-6.
79. Hindsen M, Bruze M, Christensen OB. Individual variation in nickel patch test reactivity. Am J Contact Dermal 1999; 10: 62-7.
80. Aberer W. Die "falsch-positive" Epikutantest-Reaktion. Derm Beruf Umwelt. 1988; 36:13-6.
81. Damian DL, Barnetson RS, Halliday GM. Effects of low-dose ultraviolet radiation on in vivo human cutaneous recall responses. Australas J Dermatol. 2001; 42:161-7.
82. Green C. The effect of topically applied corticosteroid on irritant and allergic patch test reactions. Contact Dermatitis. 1996; 35: 331-3.
83. Anveden I, Lindberg M, Andersen KE i wsp. Oral prednisone suppresses allergic but not irritant patch test reactions in individuals hypersensitive to nickel. Contact Dermatitis. 2004; 50: 298-303.
84. Mitchell JC. The angry back syndrome: eczema creates eczema. Contact Dermatitis. 1975; 1:193-4.
85. Bruynzeel DP, van Ketel WG, von Blomberg M i wsp. Angry back or the excited skin syndrome. A prospective study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1983; 8: 392-7.
86. Brasch J, Schnuch A, Uter W. Patch-test reaction patterns in patients with a predisposition to atopic dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 2003; 49: 197-201.
87. Czarnecka-Operacz M, Bator-Wegner M, Silny W. Atopy patch test reaction to airborne allergens in the diagnosis of atopic dermatitis. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2005;13: 3-16.
88. Turjanmaa K, Darsow U, Niggemann B i wsp. EAACI/GA2LEN position paper: present status of the atopy patch test. Allergy. 2006; 61:1377-84.
89. Osterballe M, Andersen KE, Bindslev-Jensen C. The diagnostic accuracy of the atopy patch test in diagnosing hypersensitivity to cow's milk and hen's egg in unselected children with and without atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004; 51: 556-62.
90. Bruynzeel DP, Ferguson J, Andersen K i wsp. Photopatch testing: a consensus methodology for Europe. J Eur Acad.Dermatol Venereol. 2004;18: 679-82.
91. Meneghini C, Angelini G. Intradermal test in contact allergy to metals. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1979; 59:123-4.
92. Moller H. Intradermal testing in doubtful cases of contact allergy to metals. Contact Dermatitis. 1989; 20:120-3.
93. Christensen OB, Wall LM. Open, closed and intradermal testing in nickel allergy. Contact Dermatitis. 1987; 16: 21-6.
94. Herbst RA, Lauerma AI, Maibach HJ. Intradermal testing in the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis. A reappraisal. Contact Dermatitis. 1993; 29:1-5.
95. Christensen OB, Moller H. External and internal exposure to the antigen in the hand eczema of nickel allergy. Contact Dermatitis. 1975; 1:136-41.
96. Wanscher B. Contact dermatitis from propolis. Br J Dermatol. 1976; 94: 451-5.
97. Hannuksela M, Salo H. The repeated open application test (ROAT). Contact Dermatitis. 1986; 14: 221-7.
98. Ale SI, Maibach HI. Clinical relevance in allergic contact dermatitis: an algorithmic approach. Dermatosen. 1995; 43: 119-21.
99. Ekelund AG, Moller H. Oral provocation in eczematous contact allergy to neomycin and hydroxy-qumolines. Acta Derm Venereol. 1969; 49: 422-6.
100. Veien NK, Hattel T, Justesen O, Norholm A. Oral challenge with metal salts. (I). Vesicular patch-test-negative hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis. 1983; 9: 402-6.
101. Veien NK, Hattel T, Justesen O, Norholm A. Oral challenge with metal salts. (II). Various types of eczema. Contact Dermatitis. 1983; 9: 407-10.
102. Veien NK, Hattel T, Justesen O, Norholm N. Oral challenge with balsam of Peru. Contact Dermatitis. 1985;12: 104-7.
103. Moller H, Ohlsson K, Linder C i wsp. The flare-up reactions after systemic provocation in contact allergy to nickel and gold. Contact Dermatitis. 1999; 40: 200-4.
104. Dorado Bris JM, Aragues MM, Sols CM, Garcia DA. Contact sensitivity to pyrazinobutazone (Carudol) with positive oral provocation test. Contact Dermatitis. 1992; 26: 355-6.
105. Lindemann M, Bohmer J, Zabel M, Grosse-Wilde H. ELISpot: a new tool for the detection of nickel sensitization. Clin Exp Allergy. 2003; 33: 992-8.
106. Śpiewak R, Moed H, von Blomberg BME i wsp. Allergic contact dermatitis to nickel: modified m vitro test protocols for better detection of allergen-specific response. Contact Dermatitis. 2007, 56: 63-9.
107. Rustemeyer T, von Blomberg BM, van Hoogstraten IM i wsp. Analysis of effector and regulatory immune reactivity to nickel. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004; 34:1458-66.
108. Wall LM. Spot tests and chemical analyses for allergen evaluation. W: Textbook of Contact Dermatitis. Rycroft RJ, Menne T, Frosch PJ (red.) Sprmger, Berlm 1995: 277-285.
109. Moed H, Boorsma DM, Tensen CP i wsp. Increased CCL27-CCR10 expression in allergic contact dermatitis: implications for local skin memory. J Pathol. 2004; 204: 39-46.
110. Mutschler E. Farmakologia i toksykologia. Urban i Partner, Wrocław 2004: 727-750 (tłum. R Śpiewak i M Wielosz).
111. Munkvad M. A comparative trial of Clinitar versus hydrocortisone cream in the treatment of atopic eczema. Br J Dermatol. 1989;121: 763-6.
112. Hansen AM, Poulsen OM, Menne T. Longitudinal study of excretion of metabolites of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urine from two psoriatic patients. Acta Derm Venereol. 1993; 73: 188-90.
113. Pion IA, Koenig KL, Lim HW. Is dermatologic usage of coal tar carcinogenic? A review of the literature. Dermatol Surg. 1995; 21: 227-31.
114. Queille-Roussel C, Duteil L, Padilla JM i wsp. Objective assessment of topical anti-inflammatory drug activity on experimentally induced nickel contact dermatitis: comparison between visual scoring, colorimetry, laser Doppler velocimetry and transepidermal water loss. Skin Pharmacol. 1990; 3: 248-55.
115. Hachem JP, De Paepe K, Vanpee E i wsp. Combination therapy improves the recovery of the skin barrier function: an experimental model using a contact allergy patch test combined with TEWL measurements. Dermatology. 2001; 202: 314-9.
116. Cohen DE, Heidary N. Treatment of irritant and allergic contact dermatitis. Dermatol Ther. 2004; 17: 334-40.
117. Feldmann RJ, Maibach HI. Percutaneous penetration of hydrocortisone with urea. Arch Dermatol. 1974; 109: 58-9.
118. Rosen K, Jontell M, Mobacken H, Rosdahl I. Epidermal Langerhans' cells in chronic eczematous dermatitis of the palms treated with PUVA and UVB. Acta Derm Venereol. 1989; 69: 200-5.
119. Bacci S, Alard P, Streilein JW. Evidence that ultraviolet B radiation transiently inhibits emigration of Langerhans cells from exposed epidermis, thwarting contact hypersensitivity induction. Eur J Immunol. 2001; 31: 3588-94.
120. Bruynzeel DP, Boonk WJ, van Ketel WG. Oral psoralen photochemotherapy of allergic contact dermatitis of the hands. Derm Beruf.Umwelt. 1982; 30: 16-20.
121. Mork NJ, Austad J. Short-wave ultraviolet light (UVB) treatment of allergic contact dermatitis of the hands. Acta Derm Venereol. 1983; 63: 87-9.
122. Rosen K, Mobacken H, Swanbeck G. Chronic eczematous dermatitis of the hands: a comparison of PUVA and UVB treatment. Acta Derm Venereol. 1987; 67: 48-54.
123. Simons JR, Bohnen IJ, van der Valk PG. A left-right comparison of UVB phototherapy and topical photochemotherapy in bilateral chronic hand dermatitis after 6 weeks' treatment. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1997; 22: 7-10.
124. Jansen CT, Viander M, Kalimo K i wsp. PUVA treatment in chromium hypersensitivity: effect on skin reactivity and lymphocyte functions. Arch Dermatol Res. 1981; 270: 255-61.
125. Kalimo K, Lammintausta K, Viander M, Jansen CT. PUVA treatment of nickel contact dermatitis: effect on dermatitis, patch test sensitivity, and lymphocyte transformation reactivity. Photodermatol. 1989; 6: 16-9.
126. Dogra S, Parsad D, Handa S. Narrowband ultraviolet B in airborne contact dermatitis: a ray of hope! Br J Dermatol. 2004; 150: 373-4.
127. AlomarA, Puig L, Gallardo CM, Valenzuela N. Topical tacrolimus 0.1% ointment (protopic) reverses nickel contact dermatitis elicited by allergen challenge to a similar degree to mometasone furoate 0.1% with greater suppression of late erythema. Contact Dermatitis. 2003; 49:185-8.
128. Belsito D, Wilson DC, Warshaw E i wsp. A prospective randomized clinical trial of 0.1% tacrolimus ointment in a model of chronic allergic contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006; 55: 40-6.
129. Pacor ML, Di Lorenzo G, Martinelli N i wsp. Tacrolimus ointment in nickel sulphate-induced steroid-resistant allergic contact dermatitis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2006; 27: 527-31.
130. Saripalli YV, Gadzia JE, Belsito DV. Tacrolimus ointment 0.1% in the treatment of nickel-induced allergic contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003; 49: 477-82.
131. Bhardwaj SS, Jaimes JP, Liu A, Warshaw EM. A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled pilot study comparing topical immunomodulating agents and corticosteroids for treatment of experimentally induced nickel contact dermatitis. Dermatitis. 2007; 18: 26-31.
132. Katz SI. Mechanisms involved in allergic contact dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1990; 86: 670-1.
133. Kaaber K, Menne T, Tjell JC, Veien N. Antabuse treatment of nickel dermatitis. Chelation - a new principle in the treatment of nickel dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1979; 5: 221-8.
134. Kaaber K, Menne T, Veien N, Hougaard P. Treatment of nickel dermatitis with Antabuse; a double blind study. Contact Dermatitis. 1983; 9: 297-9.
135. Kaaber K, Menne T, Veien NK, Baadsgaard O. Some adverse effects of disulfiram in the treatment of nickel-allergic patients. Derm Beruf Umwelt. 1987; 35: 209-11.
136. Santucci B, Cannistraci C, Cristaudo A, Picardo M. Interaction of metals in nickel-sensitive patients. Contact Dermatitis. 1993; 29: 251-3.
137. Tanaka S, Akaishi E, Hosaka K i wsp. Zinc ions suppress mitogen-activated interleukin-2 production in Jurkat cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005; 335: 162-7.
138. Santucci B. ZnSO4 treatment in NiSO4-positive patients. Contact Dermatitis. 1999; 40: 281-2.
139. Artik S, Haarhuis K, Wu X i wsp. Tolerance to nickel: oral nickel administration induces a high frequency of anergic T cells with persistent suppressor activity. J Immunol. 2001; 167: 6794-803.
140. Artik S, Gleichmann E, Ruzicka T. Toleranzinduktion gegen Nickel. Vom Tiermodell zum Menschen. Hautarzt. 2004; 55: 1052-9.
141. Morris DL. Intradermal testing and sublingual desensitization for nickel. Cutis 1998; 61: 129-32.
142. Kligman AM. Hyposensitization against Rhus dermatitis. AMA Arch Derm. 1958; 78: 47-72.
143. Marks JG Jr, Trautlein JJ, Epstein WL i wsp. Oral hyposensitization to poison ivy and poison oak. Arch Dermatol. 1987;123: 476-8.
144. Belsito DV. The diagnostic evaluation, treatment, and prevention of allergic contact dermatitis in the new millennium. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000; 105: 409-20.
145. Veien NK, Hattel T, Laurberg G. Low nickel diet: an open, prospective trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993; 29:1002-7.
146. Antico A, Soana R. Chronic allergic-like dermatopathies in nickel-sensitive patients. Results of dietary restrictions and challenge with nickel salts. Allergy Asthma Proc. 1999; 20: 235-42.
147. European Parliament and Council Directive 94/27/EC of 30 June 1994 amending for the 12th time Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations. Official Journal L 188 , 22.07.1994, 1-2.
148. Council Directive of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (76/769/EEC). Official Journal L 262, 27.09.1976, 201.
149. Council Regulation (EC) No 975/98 of 3 May 1998 on denominations and technical specifications of Euro coins intended for circulation. Official Journal L 139 11.05.1998, 6-8.
150. Rozporza̧dzenie Ministra gospodarki i pracy z dnia 5 lipca 2004 r. w sprawie ograniczeń, zakazów lub warunków produkcji, obrotu lub stosowania substancji niebezpiecznych i preparatów niebezpiecznych oraz zawieraja̧cych je produkto̧w. Dziennik Ustaw z 17 lipca 2006, nr 127, poz. 887, 11723-11772.
151. Jensen CS, Lisby S, Baadsgaard O i wsp. Decrease in nickel sensitization in a Danish schoolgirl population with ears pierced after implementation of a nickel-exposure regulation. Br J Dermatol. 2002; 146: 636-42.