Long-term fluctuation of standard automatic perimetry, pulsar perimetry and frequency-doubling technology in early glaucoma diagnosis

Ophthalmic Research

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 338-343

  Gonzalez Hernandez, M ^a,c   Gonzalez De La Rosa, M ^a   Rodriguez De La Vega, R ^a   Hernandez Vidal, A ^b  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DE CANARIAS   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c NONE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Frequency doubling technology; Glaucoma; Pulsar perimetry; Standard automatic perimetry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

AGED; AUTOMATION; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 36949004108     PISSN: 00303747     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000109997     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Hart WM Jr, Silverman SE, Trick GL, Nesher R, Gordon MO: Glaucomatous visual field damage: luminance and color-contrast sensitivities. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990;31:359-367.
2. Kwon YH, Park HJ, Jap A, Ugurlu S, Caprioli J: Test-retest variability of blue-on-yellow perimetry is greater than white-on-white perimetry in normal subjects. Am J Ophthalmol 1998;126:29-36.
3. Wild JM, Cubbidge RP, Pacey IE, Robinson R: Pointwise analysis of short-wavelength automated perimetry thresholds in a normal population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996;37:S1087.
4. Sample PA, Martínez GA, Weinreb RN: Short-wavelength automated perimetry without lens density testing. Am J Ophthalmol 1994;118:632-641.
5. Tyler CW: Specific deficits of flicker sensitivity in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981;20:204-212.
6. Gonzalez de la Rosa M, Rodríguez J, Rodríguez M: Flicker-TOP perimetry in normals, patients with ocular hypertension and early glaucoma; in Wall M, Wild J (eds): Perimetry Update 1998/1999. Amsterdam, Kugler Publ, 1999, pp 59-66.
7. Burk R: Laser Scanning Tomographie: Interpretation der Ausdrucke des Heidelberg Retina Tomographen HRTII. Z Prakt Augenheilkd 2002;22:183-190.
8. Weinreb RN, Lusky M, Bartsch DU, Morsman D: Effect of repetitive imaging on topographic measurements of the optic nerve head. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:636-638.
9. Maddess T, Goldberg I, Dobinson J, Winw S, James AC: Clinical trials of the frequency doubled illusion as an indicator of glaucoma (ARVO abstracts). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36:S1568.
10. Gonzalez-Hernandez M, Abreu A, Sanchez M, Gonzalez de la Rosa M: Combined spatial, contrast and temporal function perimetry in early glaucoma and ocular hypertension; in Henson DB, Wall M (eds): Perimetry Update 2002/2003. Amsterdam, Kugler Publ, 2004, p 247.
11. Gonzalez de la Rosa M, Martinez A, Sanchez M, Mesa C, Cordoves L, Losada MJ: Accuracy of the Tendency Oriented Perimetry (TOP) in the Octopus 1-2-3 Perimeter; in Wall M, Wild J (eds): Perimetry Update 1996/1997. Amsterdam, Kugler Publ, 1997, pp 119-123.
12. Diaz Aleman VT, Fernandez-Baca Vaca G, Lozano Lopez V, Garcia Somalo M, Perera Sanz D, Gonzalez de la Rosa M: Nomograma de riesgo de progreso de hipertension ocular basado en el Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2005;80:151-154.
13. Gonzalez-Hernandez M, Pareja Rios A, Rodriguez M, Gonzalez de la Rosa M: Combined spatial resolution and contrast perimetry in normal subjects; in Wall M, Mills RP (eds): Perimetry Update 2000/2001. Amsterdam, Kugler Publ, 2001, pp 109-114.
14. Gonzalez-Hernandez M: Perimetrias de modulación temporal y movimiento. Dependencias respecto a la percepción del contraste y la resolución espacial. Aplicación al diagnóstico precoz del glaucoma (thesis). La Laguna, University of La Laguna, 2002.
15. Gonzalez-Hernandez M, Fernandez-Vidal A, Garcia-Feijoo J, Gonzalez de la Rosa M: Perimetric measurement of contrast sensitivity functions; in Henson D, Wall M (eds): Perimetry Update 2002/2003. Amsterdam, Kugler Publ, 2004, pp 109-114.
16. Arden GB, Jacobson JJ: A simple grating test for contrast sensitivity: preliminary results indicate value in screening for glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1978;17:23-32.
17. Ross JE, Bron AJ, Clarke DD: Contrast sensitivity and visual disability in chronic simple glaucoma. Br J Opthalmol 1984;68:821-827.
18. Sample PA, Juang PS, Weinreb RN: Isolating the effects of primary open-angle glaucoma on the contrast sensitivity function. Am J Ophthalmol 1991;112:308-316.
19. Fernandez-Vidal A, Garcia-Feijoo J, Garcia-Sanchez J: PULSAR perimetry: a new strategy for early glaucoma evaluation (preliminary findings); in Henson D, Wall M (eds): Perimetry Update 2002/2003. Amsterdam, Kugler Publ, 2004, pp 199-205.
20. Gonzalez de la Rosa M, Mendez Hernandez C, Perez Hernandez JR, Garcia Feijoo J, Gonzalez-Hernandez M, Diaz Aleman T, Garcia Sanchez J: TOP strategy and PULSAR T30W perimetry in glaucoma early diagnosis; in Reece SM (ed): Focus on Glaucoma Research. New York, Nova Science Publishers Inc, 2005, pp 117-172.
21. Gonzalez de la Rosa M, Gonzalez-Hernandez M, Garcia Feijoo J, Morales J, Azuara-Blanco A: Diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of Tendency Oriented Perimetry in glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 2006;6:259-267.
22. Artes PH, Nicolela MT, McCormick TA, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC: Effects of blur and repeated testing on sensitivity estimates with frequency doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:646-652.
23. Gonzalez de la Rosa M, Gonzalez-Hernandez M, Diaz Aleman T: Linear regression analysis of the cumulative defect curve by sectors and other criteria of glaucomatous visual field progression. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2006;84:577.
24. Gonzalez de la Rosa M, Gonzalez-Hernandez M, Diaz Aleman T, Sanchez Mendez M: Stabilization and comparison of TOP and Bracketing perimetric strategies using a threshold spatial filter. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007, Epub ahead of print.
25. Heijl A, Bengtsson B: The effect of perimetric experience in patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114:19-22.
26. Fujimoto N, Minowa K, Miyauchi O, Hanawa T, Adachi-Usami E: Learning effect for frequency doubling perimetry in patients with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;133:269-270.
27. Matsuo H, Tomita G, Suzuki Y, Araie M: Learning effect and measurement variability in frequency-doubling technology perimetry in chronic open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2002;11:467-473.
28. Heeg GP, Ponsioen TL, Jansonius NM: Learning effect, normal range, and test-retest variability of Frequency Doubling Perimetry as a function of age, perimetric experience, and the presence or absence of glaucoma. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2003;23:535-540.
29. Brush MB, Chen PP: Learning effect among perimetric novices with screening C-20-1 frequency doubling technology perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;137:551-552.
30. Brush MB, Chen PP: Test-retest variability in glaucoma patients tested with C-20-1 screening-mode frequency doubling technology perimetry. J Glaucoma 2004;13:273-277.
31. Iester M, Capris P, Pandolfo A, Zingirian M, Traverso CE: Learning effect, short-term fluctuation, and long-term fluctuation in frequency doubling technique. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130:160-164.
32. Horani A, Frenkel S, Yahalom C, Farber MD, Ticho U, Blumenthal EZ: The learning effect in visual field testing of healthy subjects using frequency doubling technology. J Glaucoma 2002;11:511-516.
33. Wild JM, Kim LS, Pacey IE, Cunliffe IA: Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry. Ophthalmology 2006;113:206-215.
34. Pierre-Filho Pde T, Schimiti RB, de Vasconcellos JP, Costa VP: Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, SITA Standard and SITA Fast perimetry in perimetrically inexperienced individuals. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2006;84:345-350.
35. Gonzalez de la Rosa M, Gonzalez-Hernandez M, Garcia Feijoo J, Morales J, Azuara-Blanco A: Diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of tendency oriented perimetry in glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 2006;16:259-267.
36. Delgado MF, Nguyen NT, Cox TA, Singh K, Lee DA, Dueker DK, Fechtner RD, et al.: Automated perimetry: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2002;109:2362-2374.
37. Aulhorn E, Kost G: Rauschfeldkampimetrie. Eine neuartige perimetrische Untersuchungsweise. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1988;192:284-288.