Genome-wide view of cell fate specification: Ladybird acts at multiple levels during diversification of muscle and heart precursors

Genes and Development

Volumn 21, Issue 23, 2007, Pages 3163-3180

  Junion, Guillaume ^a,b   Bataillé, Laetitia ^a   Jagla, Teresa ^a   Da Ponte, Jean Philippe ^a   Tapin, Romain ^a   Jagla, Krzysztof ^a  

^a INSERM   (France)

^b EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cell fate; ChEST; Drosophila; Heart; Ladybird; Microarray; Muscle

Indexed keywords

ALPHA INTEGRIN; MUSCLE PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL FATE; CELL FUNCTION; CELL INTERACTION; CELL MOTILITY; CELL SHAPE; CELL SPECIFICITY; CELL TYPE; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; DNA MICROARRAY; DROSOPHILA; EMBRYO; GENE CONTROL; GENE FUNCTION; GENE NUMBER; GENE TARGETING; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME; HEART; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MORPHOLOGY; MUSCLE; MUSCLE CONTRACTILITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FAMILY;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FUSION; CELL MOVEMENT; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; DROSOPHILA; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENE TARGETING; GENES, HOMEOBOX; GENES, INSECT; GENOME, INSECT; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MYOBLASTS; MYOBLASTS, CARDIAC; RNA INTERFERENCE;

EID: 36849093461     PISSN: 08909369     EISSN: 15495477     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gad.437307     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Alvares, L.E., Schubert, F.R., Thorpe, C., Mootoosamy, R.C., Cheng, L., Parkyn, G., Lumsden, A., and Dietrich, S. 2003. Intrinsic, Hox-dependent cues determine the fate of skeletal muscle precursors. Dev. Cell 3: 379-390.
2. Baylies, M.K. and Michelson, A.M. 2001. Invertebrate myogenesis: Looking back to the future of muscle development. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11: 431-439.
3. Bloor, J.W. and Brown, N.H. 1998. Genetic analysis of the Drosophila αPS2 integrin subunit reveals discrete adhesive, morphogenetic and sarcomeric functions. Genetics 148: 1127-1142.
4. Briscoe, J., Pierani, A., Jessell, T.M., and Ericson, J. 2000. A homeodomain protein code specifies progenitor cell identity and neuronal fate in the ventral neural tube. Cell 101: 435-445.
5. Brohmann, H., Jagla, K., and Birchmeier, C. 2000. The role of Lbx1 in migration of muscle precursor cells. Development 127: 437-445.
6. Brown, N.H., Gregory, S.L., and Martin-Bermudo, M.D. 2000. Integrins as mediators of morphogenesis in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 223: 1-16.
7. Buckingham, M. 2003. How the community effect orchestrates muscle differentiation. Bioessays 25: 13-16.
8. Carmena, A., Gisselbrecht, S., Harrison, J., Jimenez, F., and Michelson, A.M. 1998. Combinatorial signaling codes for the progressive determination of cell fates in the Drosophila embryonic mesoderm. Genes & Dev. 12: 3910-3922.
9. Certel, S.J. and Thor, S. 2004. Specification of Drosophila motoneuron identity by the combinatorial action of POU and LIM-HD factors. Development 131: 5429-5439.
10. Cheng, L., Samad, O.A., Xu, Y., Mizuguchi, R., Luo, P., Shirasawa, S., Goulding, M., and Ma, Q. 2005. Lbx1 and Tlx3 are opposing switches in determining GABAergic versus glutamatergic transmitter phenotypes. Nat. Neurosci. 11: 1510-1515.
11. Chittenden, T., Livingston, D.M., and Kaelin Jr., W.G. 1991. The T/E1A-binding domain of the retinoblastoma product can interact selectively with a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein. Cell 65: 1073-1082.
12. Couderc, J.L., Godt, D., Zollman, S., Chen, J., Li, M., Tiong, S., Cramton, S.E., Sahut-Barnola, I., and Laski, F.A. 2002. The bric a brac locus consists of two paralogous genes encoding BTB/POZ domain proteins and acts as a homeotic and morphogenetic regulator of imaginal development in Drosophila. Development 129: 2419-2433.
13. De Graeve, F., Jagla, T., Daponte, J.P., Rickert, C., Dastugue, B., Urban, J., and Jagla, K. 2004. The ladybird homeobox genes are essential for the specification of a subpopulation of neural cells. Dev. Biol. 270: 122-134.
14. de la Cruz, I.P., Levin, J.Z., Cummins, C., Anderson, P., and Horvitz, H.R. 2003. sup-9, sup-10, and unc-93 may encode components of a two-pore K+ channel that coordinates muscle contraction in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Neurosci. 23: 9133-9145.
15. Estrada, B., Choe, S.E., Gisselbrecht, S.S., Michaud, S., Raj, L., Busser, B.W., Halfon, M.S., Church, G., and Michelson, A.M. 2006. An integrated strategy for analyzing the unique developmental programs of different myoblast subtypes. PLoS Genet. 2: e16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020016.
16. Fichelson, P., Audibert, A., Simon, F., and Gho, M. 2005. Cell cycle and cell-fate determination in Drosophila neural cell lineages. Trends Genet. 21: 413-420.
17. Frasch, M. 1999a. Intersecting signalling and transcriptional pathways in Drosophila heart specification. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 10: 61-71.
18. Frasch, M. 1999b. Controls in patterning and diversification of somatic muscles during Drosophila embryogenesis. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9: 522-529.
19. Gompel, N. and Carroll, S.B. 2003. Genetic mechanisms and constraints governing the evolution of correlated traits in drosophilid flies. Nature 424: 931-935.
20. Gross, M.K., Moran-Rivard, L., Velasquez, T., Nakatsu, M.N., Jagla, K., and Goulding, M. 2000. Lbx1 is required for muscle precursor migration along a lateral pathway into the limb. Development 127: 413-424.
21. Halfon, M.S., Carmena, A., Gisselbrecht, S., Sackerson, C.M., Jimenez, F., Baylies, M.K., and Michelson, A.M. 2000. Ras pathway specificity is determined by the integration of multiple signal-activated and tissue-restricted transcription factors. Cell 103: 63-74.
22. Jagla, K., Frasch, M., Jagla, T., Dretzen, G., Bellard, F., and Bellard, M. 1997. ladybird, a new component of the cardiogenic pathway in Drosophila required for diversification of heart precursors. Development 124: 3471-3479.
23. Jagla, T., Bellard, F., Lutz, Y., Dretzen, G., Bellard, M., and Jagla, K. 1998. ladybird determines cell fate decisions during diversification of Drosophila somatic muscles. Development 125: 3699-3708.
24. Jagla, T., Bellard, F., Vonesch, J.L., Bellard, M., Dastugue, B., and Jagla, K. 1999. Plasticity within the lateral somatic mesoderm of Drosophila embryos. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 43: 571-573.
25. Jagla, T., Bidet, Y., Da Ponte, J.P., Dastugue, B., and Jagla, K. 2002. Cross-repressive interactions of identity genes are essential for proper specification of cardiac and muscular fates in Drosophila. Development 129: 1037-1047.
26. Junion, G., Jagla, T., Duplant, S., Tapin, R., Da Ponte, J.P., and Jagla, K. 2005. Mapping Dmef2-binding regulatory modules by using a ChIP-enriched in silico targets approach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102: 18479-18484.
27. Kim, Y.O., Park, S.J., Balaban, R.S., Nirenberg, M., and Kim, Y. 2004. A functional genomic screen for cardiogenic genes using RNA interference in developing Drosophila embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101: 159-164.
28. Knirr, S., Azpiazu, N., and Frasch, M. 1999. The role of the NK-homeobox gene slouch (S59) in somatic muscle patterning. Development 126: 4525-4535.
29. Lee, H.H. and Frasch, M. 2000. Wingless effects mesoderm patterning and ectoderm segmentation events via induction of its downstream target sloppy paired. Development 127: 5497-5508.
30. Liu, J., Qian, L., Wessells, R.J., Bidet, Y., Jagla, K., and Bodmer, R. 2006. Hedgehog and RAS pathways cooperate in the anterior-posterior specification and positioning of cardiac progenitor cells. Dev. Biol. 290: 373-385.
31. Livak, K.J. and Schmittgen, T.D. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-ΔΔ C(T)) method. Methods 25: 402-408.
32. Maqbool, T., Soler, C., Jagla, T., Daczewska, M., Lodha, N., Palliyil, S., Vijayraghavan, K., and Jagla, K. 2006. Shaping leg muscles in Drosophila: Role of ladybird, a conserved regulator of appendicular myogenesis. PLoS ONE 1: e122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000122.
33. Mootoosamy, R.C. and Dietrich, S. 2002. Distinct regulatory cascades for head and trunk myogenesis. Development 129: 573-583.
34. Neyt, C., Jagla, K., Thisse, C., Thisse, B., Haines, L., and Currie, P.D. 2000. Evolutionary origins of vertebrate appendicular muscle. Nature 408: 82-86.
35. Olson, E.N. 2006. Gene regulatory networks in the evolution and development of the heart. Science 313: 1922-1927.
36. Paterson, B.M., Walldorf, U., Eldridge, J., Dubendorfer, A., Frasch, M., and Gehring, W.J. 1991. The Drosophila homologue of vertebrate myogenic-determination genes encodes a transiently expressed nuclear protein marking primary myogenic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88: 3782-3786.
37. Philippakis, A.A., Busser, B.W., Gisselbrecht, S.S., He, F.S., Estrada, B., Michelson, A.M., and Bulyk, M.L. 2006. Expression-guided in silico evaluation of candidate cis regulatory codes for Drosophila muscle founder cells. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2: e53. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020053.
38. Rebeiz, M., Reeves, N.L., and Posakony, J.W. 2002. SCORE: A computational approach to the identification of cis-regulatory modules and target genes in whole-genome sequence data. Site clustering over random expectation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99: 9888-9893.
39. Reddy, K.L., Wohlwill, A., Dzitoeva, S., Lin, M.H., Holbrook, S., and Storti, R.V. 2000. The Drosophila PAR domain protein 1 (Pdp1) gene encodes multiple differentially expressed mRNAs and proteins through the use of multiple enhancers and promoters. Dev. Biol. 224: 401-414.
40. Riechmann, V. and Ephrussi, A. 2001. Axis formation during Drosophila oogenesis. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11: 374-383.
41. Roulet, E., Busso, S., Camargo, A.A., Simpson, A.J., Mermod, N., and Bucher, P. 2002. High-throughput SELEX SAGE method for quantitative modeling of transcription-factor binding sites. Nat. Biotechnol. 20: 831-835.
42. Sandmann, T., Jensen, L.J., Jakobsen, J.S., Karzynski, M.M., Eichenlaub, M.P., Bork, P., and Furlong, E.E. 2006. A temporal map of transcription factor activity: mef2 directly regulates target genes at all stages of muscle development. Dev. Cell 10: 797-807.
43. Skeath, J.B. 1999. At the nexus between pattern formation and cell-type specification: The generation of individual neuroblast fates in the Drosophila embryonic central nervous system. Bioessays 21: 922-931.
44. Tautz, D., and Pfeifle, C. 1989. A non-radioactive in situ hybridization method for the localization of specific RNAs in Drosophila embryos reveals translational control of the segmentation gene hunchback. Chromosoma 98: 81-85.
45. Vasyutina, E., Stebler, J., Brand-Saberi, B., Schulz, S., Raz, E., and Birchmeier, C. 2005. CXCR4 and Gab1 cooperate to control the development of migrating muscle progenitor cells. Genes & Dev. 19: 2187-2198.
46. Xu, X., Yin, Z., Hudson, J.B., Ferguson, E.L., and Frasch, M. 1998. Smad proteins act in combination with synergistic and antagonistic regulators to target Dpp responses to the Drosophila mesoderm. Genes & Dev. 12: 2354-2370.
47. Zaffran, S. and Frasch, M. 2002. Early signals in cardiac development. Circ. Res. 91: 457-469.
48. Zaffran, S., Reim, I., Qian, L., Lo, P.C., Bodmer, R., and Frasch, M. 2006. Cardioblast-intrinsic Tinman activity controls proper diversification and differentiation of myocardial cells in Drosophila. Development 133: 4073-4083.
49. Zhou, Q. and Wong, W.H. 2004. CisModule: De novo discovery of cis-regulatory modules by hierarchical mixture modeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101: 12114-12119.
50. Zikova, M., Dastugue, B., and Jagla, K. 2003. Patterning of the cardiac outflow region in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100: 12189-12194.