Assessing sexual conflict in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 361, Issue 1466, 2006, Pages 287-299

  Rice, William R ^a   Stewart, Andrew D ^a   Morrow, Edward H ^a   Linder, Jodell E ^a,b   Orteiza, Nicole ^a   Byrne, Phillip G ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b University of Georgia ^*  (United States)

^c AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Indirect benefits; Interlocus contest evolution; Interlocus sexual conflict; Sexually antagonistic coevolution

Indexed keywords

ANTAGONISM; COEVOLUTION; SEXUAL CONFLICT;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CONFLICT; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETICS; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION GENETICS; REVIEW; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETICS, POPULATION; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 33646562806     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1787     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (52)

1. Andrés, J. A. & Morrow, E. H. 2003 The origin of interlocus sexual conflict: is sex-linkage important? J. Evol. Biol. 16, 219-223. (doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00525.x)
2. Arnqvist, G. 1992 Precopulatory fighting in a waterstrider: inter-sexual conflict or mate assessment? Anim. Behav. 43, 559-567. (doi:10.1016/0003- 3472(92)90079-0)
3. Arnqvist, G. 2004 Sexual conflict and sexual selection: lost in the chase. Evolution 58, 1383-1388.
4. Bateman, A. J. 1948 Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2, 349-368.
5. Brown, W. D., Björk, A., Schneider, K. & Pitnick, S. 2004 No evidence that polyandry benefits females in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 58, 1242-1250.
6. Bull, J. J. 1983 Evolution of sex determining mechanisms. Melno park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
7. Byrne, P. G. & Rice, W. R. 2005 Remating in Drosophila melanogaster. an examination of the trading-up and intrinsic male-quality hypotheses. J. Evol. Biol. 18, 1324-1331. (doi:10.1111/j.l420-9101.2005.00918.x)
8. Byrne, P. G., Rice, G. R. & Rice, W. R. Submitted. Influence on female fitness of a refuge from persistent male courtship in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory environment. Evol. Ecol. Res.
9. Chapman, T. 2001 Seminal-fluid mediated fitness traits in Drosophila. Heredity 87, 511-521. (doi:10.1046/j.l365-2540.2001.00961.x)
10. Chapman, T., Liddle, L. F., Kalib, J. M., Wolfner, M. F. & Partridge, L. 1995 Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory glad products. Nature 373, 241-244. (doi:10.1038/373241a0)
11. Chapman, T., Arnqvist, G., Bangham, J. & Rowe, L. 2003 Sexual conflict. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 18, 41-47. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00004-6)
12. Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. 1980 Sex-differences in fitness and selection for centric fusions between sex-chromosomes and autosomes. Gen. Res. 35, 205-214.
13. Cordero, C. & Eberhard, W. G. 2003 Female choice of antagonistic male adaptations: a critical review of current research. J. Evol. Biol. 16, 1-6. (doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00506.x)
14. Dawkins, R. 1976 The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Day, T. 2000 Sexual selection and the evolution of costly female preferences: spatial effects. Evolution 54, 715-730.
16. Fowler, K. & Partridge, L. 1989 A cost of mating in female fruit flies. Nature 338, 760-761. (doi:10.1038/338760a0)
17. Friberg, U. T., Lew, T. A., Byrne, P. G. & Rice, W. R. 2005 Assessing the potential for an ongoing arms race within and between the sexes: selection and heritable variation. Evolution 59, 1540-1551.
18. Gavrilets, S. 2000 Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict. Nature 403, 886-889. (doi:10.1038/35002564)
19. Gavrilets, S., Arnqvist, G. & Friberg, U. 2000 The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict. Proc. R. Soc. B. 268, 531-539.
20. Gibson, J. R., Chippindale, A. K. & Rice, W. R. 2002 The X chromosome is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation. Proc. R. Soc. B 269, 499-505. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1863)
21. Harshman, L. G. & Clark, A. G. 1998 Inference of sperm competition from broods of field-caught Drosophila. Evolution 52, 1334-1341.
22. Holland, B. 2002 Sexual selection fails to promote adaptation to a new environment. Evolution 56, 721-730.
23. Holland, B. & Rice, W. R. 1998 Perspective: chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52, 1-7.
24. Imhof, M., Harr, B., Brem, G. & Sclotterer, C. 1998 Multiple mating in wild Drosophila melanogaster revisited by microsatellite analysis. Mol. Ecol. 7, 915-917. (doi:10.1046/j.l365-294x.1998.00382.x)
25. Jones, B. & Clark, A. G. 2003 Bayesian sperm competition estimates. Genetics 163, 1193-1199.
26. Kuijper, B., Stewart, A. D. & Rice, W. R. Submitted. Cost of multiple mating in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA.
27. Linder, J. E. & Rice, W. R. 2005 Natural selection and genetic variation for female resistance to harm from males. J. Evol. Biol. 18, 568-575. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00872.x)
28. Mandel, S. P. H. 1971 Owen's model of a genetic system with differential viability between the sexes. Heredity 26, 49-63.
29. Markow, T. A. 1988 Reproductive behavior of Drosophila in the laboratory and in the field. J. Comp. Psychol. 102, 169-173. (doi:10.1037/0735-7036.102.2. 169)
30. Maynard Smith, J. 1976 What determines the rate of evolution? Am. Nat 110, 331-338. (doi:10.1086/283071)
31. Morrow, E. H., Stewart, A. D. & Rice, W. R. In press. Patterns of sperm precedence are not affected by female mating history in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution.
32. Orteiza, N., Linder, J. E. & Rice, W. R. 2005 Sexy sons from re-mating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system. J. Evol. Biol. 18, 1315-1323. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00923.x)
33. Parker, G. A. 1979 Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects (ed. M. S. Blum & N. A. Blum), pp. 123-166. London: Academic Press.
34. Partridge, L. & Fowler, K. 1990 Nonmating costs of exposure to males in female Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 36, 419-425. (doi:10.1016/0022-1910(90)90059-O)
35. Partridge, L., Green, A. & Fowler, K. 1987 Effects of egg-production and of exposure to males on female survival in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect. Physiol. 33, 746-749. (doi:10.1016/0022-1910(87)90060-6)
36. Parsons, P. A. 1961 The initial progress of new genes with viability differences between the sexes and sex linkage. Heredity 16, 103-107.
37. Rice, W. R. 1984 Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38, 735-742.
38. Rice, W. R. 1986 On the instability of polygenic sex determination: the effect of sex-specific selection. Evolution 40, 633-639.
39. Rice, W. R. 1987 The accumulation of sexually antagonistic genes as a selective agent promoting the evolution of reduced recombination between primitive sex chromosomes. Evolution 41, 911-914.
40. Rice, W. R. 1996 Sexually anatagonistic male adaptations triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381, 232-234. (doi:10.1038/381232a0)
41. Rice, W. R. 1998 Intergenomic conflict, interlocus antagonistic coevolution, and the evolution of reproductive isolation. In Endless forms: species and speciation (ed. D. J. Howard & S. H. Berlocher), pp. 261-270. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Rice, W. R. 2000 Dangerous liaisons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 12953-12955. (doi:10.1073/pnas.97.24.12953)
43. Rice, W. R. & Holland, B. 1997 The enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE), and the intraspecific Red Queen. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41, 1-10. (doi:10.1007/s002650050357)
44. Rice, W. R. & Holland, B. 1999 Reply to comments on the chase-away model of sexual selection. Evolution 53, 302-306.
45. Rice, W. R. & Chippindale, A. K. 2001 Sexual recombination and the power of natural selection. Science 294, 555-559. (doi:10.1126/science.1061380)
46. Rice, W. R., Linder, J. E., Friberg, U., Lew, T. A., Morrow, E. H. & Stewart, A. D. 2005 Inter-locus antagonistic coevolution as an engine of speciation: assessment with hemiclonal analysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6527-6534. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0501889102)
47. Rowe, L., Arnqvist, G., Krupa, J. & Sih, A. 1994 Sexual conflict and the evolutionary ecology of mating patterns: water striders as a model system. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 289-293. (doi:10.1016/0169-5347(94)90032-9)
48. Sgrò, C. M. & Partridge, L. 2000 Evolutionary responses of the life history of wild-caught Drosophila melanogaster to two standard methods of laboratory culture. Am. Nat. 156, 341-353.
49. Spieth, H. T. 1952 Mating behavior within the genus Drosophila (Diptera). Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 99, 399-474.
50. Stewart, A. D., Morrow, E. H. & Rice, W. R. 2005 Assessing putative interlocus sexual conflict in Drosophila melanogaster using experimental evolution. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 2029-2035. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3182)
51. Trivers, R. L. 1972 Paternal investment and sexual selection. In Sexual selection and the descent of man (ed. B. Campbell), pp. 136-179. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
52. Wolfner, M. F. 1997 Tokens of love: functions and regulation of Drosophila male accessory gland products. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 27, 179-192. (doi:10.1016/S0965-1748(96)00084-7)