From monitoring users to controlling user actions: A new perspective on the user-centred approach to CALL

Computer Assisted Language Learning

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 297-321

  Ma, Qing ^a  

^a MACAU UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Macao)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36849037312     PISSN: 09588221     EISSN: 17443210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09588220701745783     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Harlow: Longman.
2. Blin, F. (2004). CALL and the development of learner autonomy: Towards an activity-theoretical perspective. ReCALL, 16(2), 377-395.
3. Boling, E., & Soo, K. S. (1999). CALL issues: Designing CALL software. In J. Egbert & E. Handon-Smith (Eds.), CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical issues (pp. 442456). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
4. Chapelle, C. (2003). English language learning and technology. Amsterdam, PA: John Benjamins.
5. Chapelle, C., & Mizuno, S. (1989). Student's strategies with learner-controlled CALL. CALICO Journal, 7(2), 25-47.
6. Cobb, T., & Stevens, V. (1996). A principled consideration of computers and reading in a second language. In M. C. Pennington (Ed.), The power of CALL (pp. 115-135). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
7. Colpaert, J. (2004). Design of online interactive language courseware: Conceptualisation, specification and prototyping. Research into the impact of linguistic-didactic functionality on software architecture. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Antwerp, Belgium. Retrieved June 8, 2005, from http://www.didascalia.be/doc-design.pdf
8. Goodfellow, R. (1994). A computer-based strategy for foreign-language vocabulary learning. Unpublished PhD thesis, Open University, UK.
9. Goodfellow, R. (1999). Evaluating performance, approach and outcome. In K. Cameron (Ed.), CALL: Media, design, and applications (pp. 109-140). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
10. Hegelheimer, V., & Tower, D. (2004). Using CALL in the classroom: Analyzing student interaction in an authentic classroom. System, 32, 185-205.
11. Higgins, J. (1984). Learning with a computer. In S. Holden (Ed.), Teaching and the teacher (pp. 83-87). Oxford: Modern English Publications.
12. Higgins, J. (1999). Classification of CALL activities. Retrieved March 15, 2006, from http://www.celt.stir.ac.uk/call99/CALclass.html
13. Hubbard, P. (2004). Learner training for effective use of CALL. In S. Fotos, & C. Browne (Eds.), New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms (pp. 45-67). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Hwu, F. (2005). The use of learner-behavior tracking technology in CALL studies: A review of research objectives, methods, and tracking data analysis techniques. Paper presented at the CALICO conference in 2005, East Lancing, U.S.A.
15. Kelly, P. (1992). Does the ear assist the eye in the long-term retention of lexis? International Review of Applied Linguistics, 30(2), 137-145.
16. Laufer, B. (1998). The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: same or different? Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 255-271.
17. Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues, and problems. Dublin: Authentik.
18. Ma, Q. (2007). Design and evaluation of a Computer Assisted Vocabulary Learning program for Chinese learners of English: A user-centred approach. Unpublished PhD thesis, Catholic University of Louvain, Belgium.
19. Ma, Q., & Kelly, P. (2006). Computer Assisted Vocabulary Learning: Design and evaluation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 15-45.
20. McCarthy, C. P. (1998). Learner training for learner autonomy on summer language course. The Internet TESL Journal, 4(1). Retrieved March 15, 2006, from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/ McCarthy-Autonomy.html
21. Mondria, J.-A., & Wiersma, B. (2004). Receptive, productive, and receptive + productive L2 vocabulary learning: What difference does it make? In P. Bogaards, & B. Laufer (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition, and testing (pp. 79-100). Amsterdam, PA: John Benjamins.
22. Nikolova, O. R. (2002). Effects of students' participation in authoring of multimedia materials on student acquisition of vocabulary. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 100-122.
23. Plass, J. (1998). Design and evaluation of the user interface of foreign language multimedia software: A cognitive approach. Language Learning & Technology, 2(1), 35-45.
24. Shin, J., & Wastell, D. G. (2001). A user-centered mediodological framework for the design of hypermedia-based CALL systems. CALICO Journal, 18(3), 517-537.
25. Thanasoulas, D. (2000). What is learner autonomy and how can it be fostered? The Internet TESL Journal, 6(11). Retrieved March 15, 2006 from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Thanasoulas-Autonomy.html