A fragment-based scoring function to re-rank ATP docking results

International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Volumn 8, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1083-1094

  Pyrkov, Timothy V ^a,b   Efremov, Roman G ^a  

^a SHEMYAKIN OVCHINNIKOV INSTITUTE OF BIOORGANIC CHEMISTRY   (Russian Federation)

^b MOSCOW INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

ATP recognition; Molecular hydrophobicity potential; Molecular lipophilicity potential; Stacking

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL REACTION; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 36849001330     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14220067     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/i8111083     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Gitlin, J.D. Wilson disease. Gastroenterology 2003, 125, 1868-1877.
2. Ferrara, P.; Jacoby, E. Evaluation of the utility of homology models in high throughput docking. J. Mol. Model. 2007, 13, 897-905.
3. Jacobson, K.A.; Kim, S.K.; Costanzi, S.; Gao, Z.G. Purine receptors: GPCR structure and agonist design. Mol. Interv. 2004, 4, 337-347.
4. Sousa, S.F.; Fernandes, P.A.; Ramos, M.J. Protein-ligand docking: current status and future challenges. PROTEINS 2006, 65, 15-26.
5. Kitchen D.B.; Decornez, H.; Furr, J.R.; Bajorath, J. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 2004, 3,b935-949.
6. Verdonk, M.L.; Cole, J.C.; Hartshorn, M.J.; Murray, C.W.; Taylor, R.D. Improved protein-ligand docking using GOLD. PROTEINS 2003, 52, 609-623.
7. Jansen, J.M.; Martin, E.J. Target-biased scoring approaches and expert systems in structure-based virtual screening. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2004, 8, 359-364.
8. Laederach, A.; Reilly, P.J. Modeling protein recognition of carbohydrates. PROTEINS 2005, 60, 591-597.
9. Rognan, D.; Lauemoller, S.L.; Holm, A.; Buus, S.; Tschinke, V. Predicting binding affinities of protein ligands from three-dimensional models: application to peptide binding to class I major histocompatibility proteins. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 4650-4658.
10. Pyrkov, T.V.; Kosinsky, Y.A.; Arseniev, A.S.; Priestle, J.P.; Jacoby, E.; Efremov, R.G. Complementarity of hydrophobic properties in ATP-protein binding: a new criterion to rank docking solutions. PROTEINS 2007, 66, 288-298.
11. Walker, J.; Saraste, M.; Runswick, M.; Gay, N. Distantly related sequences in the α- and β-subunits of ATP-synthase, myosin, kinase and other ATP-requiring enzymes and a common nucleotide binding fold. EMBO J. 1982, 1, 945-951.
12. Traut, T.W. The functions and consensus motifs of 9 types of peptide segments that form different types of nucleotide-binding sites. Eur. J. Biochem. 1994, 222, 9-19.
13. Saraste, M.; Sibbald, P. R.; Wittinghofer, A. The P-loop - a common motif in ATP- and GTP-binding proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1990, 15, 430-434.
14. Babor, M.; Sobolev, V.; Edelman, M. Conserved positions for ribose recognition: importance of water bridging interactions among ATP, ADP and FAD-protein complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 323, 523-532.
15. Saito, M.; Go, M.; Shirai, T. An empirical approach for detecting nucleotide-binding sites on proteins. Protein. Eng. Des. Sel. 2006, 19, 67-75.
16. Mao, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Hu, X. Molecular determinants for ATP-binding in proteins: a data mining and quantum chemical analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 336, 787-807.
17. Kuttner, Y.Y.; Sobolev, V.; Raskind, A.; Edelman, M. A consensus-binding structure for adenine at the atomic level permits searching for the ligand site in a wide spectrum of adenine-containing complexes. PROTEINS 2003, 52, 400-411.
18. Cappello, V.; Tramontano, A.; Koch, U. Classification of proteins based on the properties of the ligand-binding site: the case of adenine-binding proteins. PROTEINS 2002, 47, 106-115.
19. Denissiouk, K.A.; Rantanen, V.V.; Johnson, M.S. Adenine recognition: a motif present in ATP-, CoA-, NAD-, NADP-, and FAD-dependent proteins. PROTEINS 2001, 44, 282-291.
20. Khedkar, S.A.; Malde, A.K.; Coutinho, E.C.; Srivastava, S. Pharmacophore modeling in drug discovery and development: an overview. Med. Chem. 2007, 3, 187-197
21. Chang, C.; Ekins, S.; Bahadduri, P.; Swaan, P. W. Pharmacophore-based discovery of ligands for drug transporters. Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 2006, 58, 1431-1450.
22. Efremov, R.G.; Chugunov, A.O.; Pyrkov, T.V.; Priestle, J.P.; Arseniev, A.S.; Jacoby, E. Molecular lipophilicity in protein modeling and drug design. Curr. Med. Chem. 2007, 14, 393-415.
23. Berman, H.M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T.N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I.N.; Bourne, P.E. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic. Acid. Res. 2000, 28, 235-242.
24. Jones, G.; Willett, P.; Glen, R.C.; Leach, A.R.; Taylor, R.D. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 267, 727-748.
25. Ghose, A.K.; Viswanadhan, V.N.; Wendoloski, J.J. Prediction of hydrophobic (lipophilic) properties of small organic molecules using fragmental methods: an analysis of ALOGP and CLOGP methods. J. Phys. Chem. 1998, 102, 3762-3772.
26. Friesner, R.A.; Murphy, R.B.; Repasky, M.P.; Frye, L.L.; Greenwood, J.R.; Halgren, T.A.; Sanschagrin, P.C, Mainz, D.T. Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 6177-6196.