A consensus-binding structure for adenine at the atomic level permits searching for the ligand site in a wide spectrum of adenine-containing complexes

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 400-411

  Kuttner, Yosef Y ^a   Sobolev, Vladimir ^a   Raskind, Alexander ^a   Edelman, Marvin ^a  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

Atom atom contacts; ATP; Ligand binding; Ligand design; Structural similarity

Indexed keywords

ADENINE DERIVATIVE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; LIGAND; PURINE DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; ATOM; BINDING SITE; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING;

ADENINE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; BINDING SITES; BINDING, COMPETITIVE; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 0042532314     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10422     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bernstein FC, Koetzle TF, Williams GJ, Meyer EF Jr, Brice MD, Rodgers JR, Kennard O, Shimanouchi T, Tasumi M. The Protein Data Bank: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol 1977;112:535-542.
2. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
3. Walker J, Saraste M, Runswick M, Gay N. Distantly related sequences in a- and b- subunits of ATP synthase, myosin, kinases and other ATP-requiring enzymes and common nucleotide binding fold. EMBO J 1982;1:945-951.
4. Saraste M, Sibbald PR, Wittinghofer A. The P-loop - a common motif in ATP-binding and GTP-binding proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 1990;15:430-434.
5. Hanks SK, Quinn AM, Hunter T. The protein-kinase family conserved feartures and deduced phylogeny of the catalytic domains. Science 1988;241:42-52.
6. Bairoch A, Bucher P, Hofmann K. The PROSITE database, its status in 1997. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:217-221.
7. Traut TW. The functional and consensus motifs of 9 types of peptide segments that form different types of nucleotide-binding sites. Eur J Biochem 1994;222:9-19.
8. Schulz G. Binding of nucleotides by proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1992;2:61-67.
9. Moodie SL, Mitchell JBO, Thornton JM. Protein recognition of adenylate: An example of a fuzzy recognition template. J Mol Biol 1996;263:486-500.
10. Cappello V, Tramontano A, Koch U. Classification of proteins based on the properties of the ligand-binding site: The case of adenine-binding proteins. Proteins 2002;47:106-115.
11. Nobeli I, Laskowski RA, Waldar WSJ, Thornton JM. On molecular discrimination between adenine and guanine by proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2001;29:4294-4309.
12. Kobayashi N, Go N. ATP binding proteins with different folds share a common ATP-binding structural motif. Nat Struct Biol 1997a;4:6-7.
13. Kobayashi N, Go N. A method to search for similar protein local structures at ligand-binding sites and its application to adenine recognition. Eur Biophys J 1997b;26:135-144.
14. Denessiouk KA, Johnson MS. When fold is not important: A common structural framework for adenine and AMP binding in 12 unrelated protein families. Proteins 2000;38:310-326.
15. Bruno IJ, Cole JC, Lommerse JP, Rowland RS, Taylor R, Verdonk ML. IsoStar: A library of information about nonbonded interactions. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1997;11:525-537.
16. Kuttner YY, Babor M, Edelman M, Sobolev V. Structural commonality in protein binding sites for ATP. In: El-Mabrouk, N, Lengauer T, Sankoff D, editors. Currents in computational molecular biology. Montreal: CRM; 2001. p 91-92.
17. Denessiouk LA, Rantanen VV, Johnson MS. Adenine recognition: A motif present in ATP-, CoA-, NAD-, NADP-, and FAD-dependent proteins. Proteins 2001;44:282-291.
18. Klebe G. The use of composite crystal-field environments in molecular recognition and the de novo design of protein ligands. J Mol Biol 1994;237:212-235.
19. Laskowski RA, Thornton JM, Humblet C, Singh J. X-site: Use of empirically derived atomic packing preferences to identify favourable interaction regions in the binding sites of proteins. J Mol Biol 1996;259:175-201.
20. Rantanen VV, Denessiouk KA, Gyllenberg M, Koski T, Johnson MS. A fragment library based on Gaussian mixtures predicting favorable molecular interactions. J Mol Biol 2001;313:197-214.
21. Verdonk ML, Cole JC, Taylor R. SuperStar: A knowledge-based approach for identifying interaction sites in proteins. J Mol Biol 1999;289:1093-1108.
22. Verdonk ML, Cole JC, Watson P, Gillet V, Willett P. SuperStar: Improved knowledge-based interaction field for protein binding sites. J Mol Biol 2001;307:841-859.
23. Nissink JWM, Verdonk ML, Klebe G. Simple knowledge-based descriptors to predict protein-ligand interactions: Methodology and validation. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2000;14:787-803.
24. Chakravarty S, Bhinge A, Varadarajan R. A procedure for detection and quantitation of cavity volumes in proteins. J Biol Chem 2002;30:31345-31353.
25. Yamashita MM, Wesson L, Eisenman G, Eisenberg D. Where metal ions bind in proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990;87:5648-5652.
26. Hellinga HW, Richards FM. Construction of new ligand binding sites in proteins of known structure: I. Computer-aided modelling of sites wth pre-defined geometry. J Mol Biol 1991;222:763-785.
27. Yang W, Lee H-W, Hellinga H, Yang JJ. Structural analysis, identification, and design of calcium-binding sites in proteins. Proteins 2002;47:344-356.
28. Walles AC, Borkakoti N, Thornton JM. TESS: A geometric hashing algorithm for deriving 3D coordinate templates for searching databases: Application to enzyme active sites. Protein Sci 1997;6:2308-2323.
29. Taroni C, Jones S, Thornton JM. Analysis and prediction of carbohydrate binding sites. Protein Eng 2000;13:89-98.
30. Sobolev V, Sorokine A, Prilusky J, Abola EE, Edelman M. Automated analysis of interatomic contacts in proteins. Bioinformatics 1999;15:327-332.
31. Sobolev V, Edelman M. Modeling the quinone-B binding site of the photosystem-II reaction center using notions of complementarity and contact surface between atoms. Proteins 1995;21:214-225.
32. Sobolev V, Vriend G, Wade RC, Edelman M. Molecular docking using surface complementarity. Proteins 1996;25:120-129.
33. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. Clustal-W - improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994;22:4673-4680.
34. Hung LW, Wang IX, Nikaido K, Liu PQ, Ames GF, Kim SH. Crystal structure of the ATP-binding subunit of an ABC transporter. Nature 1998;396:703-707.
35. Burley SK, Petsko GA. Amino-aromatic interactions in proteins. FEBS Lett 1986;203:139-143.
36. Levitt M, Perutz MF. Aromatic rings act as hydrogen-bond acceptors. J Mol Biol 1988;201:751-754.
37. Basharov MA, Volkenstein MV, Golovanov IB, Nauchitel VV, Sobolev VM. The fragment-fragment interaction method: Part I. Estimating molecule-molecule interactions. J Gen Chem USSR 1989;59:435-447.
38. Mitchell JBO, Nandi CL, McDonald IK, Thornton JM, Price SL. Amino/aromatic interactions in proteins - is the evidence stacked against against hydrogen-bonding? J Mol Biol 1994;239:315-331.
39. Felder C., Jiang HL., Zhu WL, Chen KX, Silman I, Botti SA, Sussman JL. Quantum/classical mechanical comparison of cation-pi interactions between tetramethylammonium and benzene. J Phys Chem A 2002;105:1326-1333.
40. Derewenda ZS, Lee L, Derewenda U. The occurrence C-H...O hydrogen-bonds in proteins. J Mol Biol 1995;252:248-262.
41. αH...O=C hydrogen bonds in a collagen triple helix. J Mol Biol 1996;264:734-742.
42. Wahl MC, Sundaralingam M. C-H...O hydrogen bonding in biology. Trends Biol Sci 1997;22:97-102.
43. Chakrabarti P, Chakrabarty S. C-H...O hydrogen bond involving proline residues in α-helices. J Mol Biol 1998;284:867-873.
44. Ghosh A, Bansal M. C-H...O hydrogen bonds in minor groove of A-tracts in DNA double helices. J Mol Biol 1999;294:1149-1158.
45. Luisi B, Orozco M, Sponer J, Luque FJ, Shakked Z. On the potential role of the amino nitrogen atom as a hydrogen bond acceptor in macromolecules. J Mol Biol 1998;279:1123-1136.
46. Leibowitz N, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. MUSTA - a general, efficient, automated method for multiple structure alignment and detection of common motifs: Application to proteins. J Comput Biol 2001;8:93-121.
47. Knöfel T, Sträter N. Mechanism of hydrolysis of phosphate esters by the dimetal center of 5′-nucleotidase based on crystal structures. J Mol Biol 2001;309:239-254.
48. Obmolova G, Teplyakov A, Bonander N, Eisenstein E, Howard AJ, Gilliland GL. Crystal structure of dephospho-coenzyme A kinase from Haemophilus influenzae. J Struct Biol 2001;136:119-125.
49. Babor M, Sobolev V, Edelman M. Conserved positions for ribose recognition: Importance of water bridging interactions among ATP-, ADP- and FAD-protein complexes. J Mol Biol 2002;323:523-532.
50. Denesyuk AI, Denessiouk KA, Korpela T, Johnson MS. Functional attributes of the phosphate group binding cup of pyridoxal phosphate-dependent enzymes. J Mol Biol 2002;316:155-172.