Catching the news: Processing strategies in listening to dialogs as measured by ERPs

Behavioral and Brain Functions

Volumn 3, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Toepel, Ulrike ^a   Pannekamp, Ann ^b   Alter, Kai ^c  

^a LAUSANNE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMMUNICATION SKILL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING ACUITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

EID: 36649012363     PISSN: 17449081     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1744-9081-3-53     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Paul H Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1880.
2. Halliday MAK Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English (Part 2) Journal of Linguistics 1967, 3:199-244.
3. Grosz B Sidner CL Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse Computational Linguistics 1986, 12(3):175-204.
4. Toepel U Contrastive Topic and Focus Information in Discourse - Prosodic Realisation and Electrophysiological Brain Correlates. MPI Series in Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences 66; 2006.
5. Cutler A Fodor JA Semantic focus and sentence comprehension Cognition 1979, 7:49-59. 10.1016/0010-0277(79)90010-6 436402
6. Cutler A Dahan D van Donselaar W Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review Lang Speech 1997, 40:141-201. 9509577
7. Nooteboom SG Kruyt JG Accents, focus distribution, and the perceived distribution of given and new information: An experiment J Acoust Soc Am 1987, 82(5):1512-1524. 10.1121/1.395195 3693693
8. Birch S Clifton C Focus, Accent, and Argument Structure: Effects on Language Comprehension Lang Speech 1995, 38(4):365-391. 8816086
9. Price PJ Ostendorf M Shattuck-Hufnagel S Fong C The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation J Acoust Soc Am 1991, 90:2956-2970. 10.1121/ 1.401770 1787237
10. Schafer A Carlson K Clifton C Frazier L Focus and the interpretation of Pitch Accent: Disambiguating embedded questions Lang Speech 2000, 43:75-105.
11. Carlson K The effects of parallelism and prosody on the processing of gapping structures Lang Speech 2001, 44:1-26. 11430186
12. Steinhauer K Alter K Friederici AD Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing Nat Neurosci 1999, 2(2):191-196. 10.1038/5757 10195205
13. Steinhauer K Friederici AD Prosodic boundaries, comma rules, and brain responses: The Closure Positive Shift in ERPs as a universal marker for prosodic phrasing in listeners and readers J Psycholinguist Res 2001, 30:267-295. 10.1023/A:1010443001646 11523275
14. Isel F Alter K Friederici AD Influence of prosodic information on the processing of split particles: ERP evidence from spoken German J Cogn Neurosci 2005, 17(1):154-167. 10.1162/0898929052880075 15701246
15. Pannekamp A Toepel U Alter K Hahne A Friederici AD Prosody-driven sentence processing J Cogn Neurosci 2005, 17(39):407-421. 10.1162/ 0898929053279450 15814001
16. Selkirk EO Phonology and Syntax: The relation between sound and structure Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1984.
17. Hruska C Alter K How prosody can influence sentence perception Information structure: Theoretical and Empirical Aspects Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter Steube A 2004:211-226.
18. Hruska C Alter K Steinhauer K Steube A Misleading dialogs: Human's brain reaction to prosodic information Orality and gestures. Interactions et comportements multimodaux dans la communication Paris: L'Hartmattan Cave C, Guaitella I, Santi S 2001:425-430.
19. Bornkessel I Schlesewsky M Friederici AD Contextual information modulates initial processes of syntactic integration: The role of inter- vs. intrasentential predictions J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2003, 29(5):871-882. 10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.871 14516220
20. Heim S Alter K Prosodic pitch accents in language comprehension and production: ERP data and acoustic analyses Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) 2006, 66(1):55-68. 16617677
21. Mietz A Toepel U Ischebeck A Alter K Inadequate and infrequent are not alike: ERPs to deviant prosodic patterns in spoken sentence comprehension Brain Lang 2007. 17428526
22. Ito K Garnsey S Brain responses to focus-related prosodic mismatches in Japanese Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2004:609-612.
23. Magne C Astésano C Lacharet-Dujour A Morel M Alter K Besson M On-line Processing of "Pop-Out" Words in spoken French Dialogues J Cogn Neurosci 2005, 17(5):740-756. 10.1162/0898929053747667 15904541
24. Nieuwland MS Van Berkum JJ When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse J Cogn Neurosci 2006, 18(7):1098-111. 10.1162/ jocn.2006.18.7.1098 16839284
25. Hagoort P van Berkum JJ Beyond the sentence given Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2007, 362(1481):801-11. 10.1098/rstb.2007.2089 17412680
26. Hagoort P Hald L Bastiaansen M Petersson KM Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension Science 2004, 304(5669):438-41. 10.1126/science.1095455 15031438
27. Ladd DR Intonational Phonology Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 1996.
28. Schafer AJ Jun SA Effects of contrastive focus on prosodic cues to clause boundaries Proceedings of the 18th Annual CUNY Conference of Human Sentence Processing Tucson, AZ; 2005.
29. Oldfield RC The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113. 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 5146491
30. Jasper HH Report of the committee on the methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1958, 10:370-375. 10.1016/0013-4694(58)90053-1
31. Birch S Clifton C Focus, Accent, and Argument Structure: Effects on Language Comprehension Lang Speech 1995, 38(4):365-391. 8816086
32. Grice H Logic and conversation Syntax and Semantics, Speech Acts New York: Academic Press Cole P, Morgan J 1975 3 41-58.
33. Twente Medical Systems International http://www.tmsi.com