Influence of prosodic information on the processing of split particles: ERP evidence from spoken German

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 154-167

  Isel, Frédéric ^a   Alter, Kai ^b   Friederici, Angela D ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUTOMATION; BRAIN; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE ABILITY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL COMMUNICATION; WORD RECOGNITION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 12544260669     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/0898929052880075     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Beach, C. M. (1991). The interpretation of prosodic patterns at points of syntactic structure ambiguity: Evidence for cue trading relations. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 644-663.
2. Bentin, S. (1987). Event-related potentials, semantic processes, and expectancy factors in word recognition. Brain and Language, 31, 308-327.
3. Chwilla, D. J., Brown, C., & Hagoort, P. (1995). The N400 as a function of the level of processing. Psychophysiology, 32, 274-285.
4. Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & van Donselaar, W. (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech, 40, 141-201.
5. Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Gaskell, M. G. (2002). Leading up the lexical garden path: Segmentation and ambiguity in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 218-244.
6. Ferreira, F., Anes, M. D., & Horine, M. D. (1996). Exploring the use of prosody during language comprehension using the auditory moving window technique. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 273-290.
7. Fodor, J. D. (2002). Psycholinguistics cannot escape prosody. In B. Bel & I. Marlien (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Speech Prosody (pp. 83-88). Keikichi Hirose Laboratory, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
8. Fodor, J. D., & Inoue, A. (1994). The diagnosis and cure of garden path. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 407-434.
9. Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In Coltheart M. (Ed.), Attention and Performance XII (pp. 559-586). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Friederici, A. D. (1995). The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and Language, 50, 259-281.
11. Friederici, A. D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 78-84.
12. Friederici, A. D., & Alter, K. (2004). Lateralization of auditory language functions: A dynamic dual pathway model. Brain and Language, 89, 267-276.
13. Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Mecklinger, A. (1996). Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late event-related brain potential effects elicited by syntactic anomalies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1219-1248.
14. Frisch, S., & Schlesewsky, M. (2001). The N400 reflects problems of thematic hierarchizing. NeuroReport, 12, 3391-3394.
15. Gee, J., & Grosjean, F. (1983). Performance structures: A Psycholinguistic and linguistic appraisal. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 411-458.
16. Gorrell, P. (1995). Syntax and parsing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Greenhouse, S., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrica, 24, 95-112.
18. Grosjean, F. (1983). How long is the sentence? Prediction and prosody in the on-line processing of language. Linguistics, 21, 501-529.
19. Grosjean, F., & Hirt, C. (1996). Using prosody to predict the end of sentences in English and French: Normal and brain-damaged subjects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 107-134.
20. Holcomb, P. J., & Neville, H. J. (1991). Natural speech processing: An analysis using event-related brain potentials. Psychobiology, 19, 286-300.
21. Holmes, V. M., Kennedy, A., & Murray, W. S. (1987). Syntactic structure and the garden path. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 277-293.
22. Hopf, J.-M., Bayer, J., Bader, M., & Meng, M. (1998). Event-related brain potentials and case information in syntactic ambiguities. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 264-280.
23. Isel, F., Gunter, T. C., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Prosody-assisted head-driven access to spoken German compounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 277-288.
24. Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. Y. (2003). Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic analysts: An electrophysiological differentiation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 98-110.
25. Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205.
27. Lehiste, I. (1972). The timing of utterances and linguistic boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 2018-2024.
28. Lehiste, I. (1973). Phonetic disambiguation of syntactic ambiguity. Glossa, 7, 107-122.
29. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8, 1-71.
30. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33.
31. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., Warren, P., Grenier, P., & Lee, C. S. (1992). Prosodic effects in minimal attachment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 73-87.
32. McClelland, J. L., St. John, M., & Taraban, R. (1989). Sentence comprehension: A parallel distributed processing approach. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 287-336.
33. Nagel, H. N., Shapiro L. P., Tuller, B., & Nawy, R. (1996). Prosodic influences on the resolution of temporary ambiguity during on-line sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 319-344.
34. Neville, H. J., Nicol, J., Barss, A., Forster, K. I., & Garrett, M. F. (1991). Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 151-165.
35. Nicol, J. L., & Pickering, M. J. (1993). Processing syntactically ambiguous sentences: Evidence from semantic priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 207-237.
36. Oldfield, R. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
37. Price, P. J., Ostendorf, M., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Fong, C. (1991). The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 2956-2970.
38. Pynte, J., & Prieur, B. (1996). Prosodic breaks and attachment decisions in sentence parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 165-191.
39. Shapiro, K., & Caramazza, A. (2003). The representation of grammatical categories in the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 201-206.
40. Speer, S. R., Kjelgaard, M. M., & Dobroth, K. M. (1996). The influence of prosodic structure on the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguities. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 249-271.
41. Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 191-196.
42. Steinhauer, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Prosodic boundaries, comma rules, and brain responses: The closure positive shift in ERPs as a universal marker for prosodic phrasing in listeners and readers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 267-295.
43. Stirling, L., & Wales, R. (1996). Does prosody support or direct sentence processing? Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 193-212.
44. Warren, P., Grabe, E., & Nolan, F. (1995). Prosody, phonology and parsing in closure ambiguities. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 457-486.
45. Watt, S. M., & Murray, W. S. (1996). Prosodic form and parsing commitments. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 291-318.