On-line processing of "pop-out" words in spoken French dialogues

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 740-756

  Magne, Cyrille ^a,d   Astésano, Corine ^a   Lacheret Dujour, Anne ^b   Morel, Michel ^b   Alter, Kai ^c   Besson, Mireille ^a  

^a Institut de neurosciences cognitives de la Méditerranée   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE CAEN   (France)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^d FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LANGUAGE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOBIOLOGY; SPEECH; TASK PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION PROCESS; WORD RECOGNITION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE TESTS; MALE; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 18244376894     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/0898929053747667     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Altmann, G. T. M., Garnham, A., van Nice, K., & Henstra, J. A. (1998). Late closure in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 459-484.
2. Astésano, C. (2001). Rythme et accentuation en français. Invariance et variabilité stylistique. Paris: L'Harmattan.
3. Astésano, C., Besson, M., & Alter, K. (2004). Brain potentials during semantic and prosodic processing in French. Cognitive Brain Research, 18, 172-184.
4. Astésano, C., Magne, C., Morel, M., Coquillon, A., Espesser, R., Besson, M., & Lacheret, A. (2004). Marquage acoustique du focus contrastif non codé syntaxiquement en français. Actes des XXVièmes Journées d'Etudes sur la parole (pp. 126-129). Fez, Morocco: Université de Provence, Aix-en Provence.
5. Besson, M., Magne, C., & Regnault, P. (2004). Le traitement du langage. In B. Renault (Ed.), L'imagerie fonctionnelle électrique (EEG) et magnétique (MEG): Ses applications en sciences cognitives. Paris: Hermés.
6. Besson, M., Magne, C., & Schön, D. (2002). Emotional prosody: Sex differences in sensitivity to speech melody. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 405-407.
7. Birch, S., & Clifton, C. E. (1995). Focus, accent, and argument structure: Effects on language comprehension. Language and Speech, 38, 365-391.
8. Bock, J. K., & Mazzella, J. R. (1983). Intonational marking of given and new information: Some consequences for comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 11, 64-76.
9. Böcker, K. B. E., Bastiaansen, M. C. M., Vroomen, J., Brunia, C. H. M., & De Gelder, B. (1999). An ERP correlate of metrical stress in spoken word recognition. Psychophysiology, 36, 706-720.
10. Bornkessel, I., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Contextual information modulates initial processes of syntactic integration: The role of inter- versus intrasentential predictions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 29, 871-882.
11. Brown, C., & Hagoort, P. (1999). On the electrophysiology of language comprehension: Implications for the human language system. In M. Crocker, M. Pickering, & C. Clifton (Eds.), Architectures and mechanisms for language processing (pp. 213-237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Brown, G. (1983). Prosodic structure and the given/new distinction. In D. R. Ladd & A. Cutler (Eds.), Prosody: Models and measurements (pp. 67-78). Berlin: Springer.
13. Chafe, W. L. (1987). Cognitive constraints of information flow. In R. S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse, typological studies in language (Vol. 11, pp. 21-51). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14. Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & van Donselaar, W. (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech, 40, 141-201.
15. Dahan, D., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Chambers, C. G. (2002). Accent and reference resolution in spoken-language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 292-314.
16. Di Cristo, A. (1998). French. In D. Hirst & A. Di Cristo (Eds.), Intonation systems: A survey of twenty languages (pp. 195-218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Di Cristo, A. (1999). Le cadre accentuel du français contemporain: Essai de modélisation (1ère partie). Langues, 2, 184-205.
18. Dik, S. (1978). Functional grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.
19. Dik, S. (1997). The theory of functional grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter.
20. Donchin, E. (1981). Surprise! ... Surprise? Psychophysiology, 18, 493-513.
21. Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context-updating? Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 11, 355-372.
22. Duncan-Johnson, C., & Donchin, E. (1977). On quantifying surprise, the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology, 14, 456-467.
23. Espesser, R. (1996). MES: Un environnement de traitement du signal. Actes des XXIièmes Journées d'Etudes sur la parole (p. 447). Avignon.
24. Fauconnier, G. (1984). Espaces mentaux. Paris: de Minuit.
25. Firbas, J. (1964). On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague, 1, 267-280.
26. Fodor, J. D. (2002). Psycholinguistics cannot escape prosody. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Speech Prosody (pp. 83-88). Aix-en Provence: Université de Provence.
27. Fowler, C. A., & Housum, J. (1987). "Talkers" signaling of "New" and "Old" words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 489-504.
28. Friedrich, C. K., Alter, K., & Kotz, S. A. (2001). An electrophysiological response to different pitch contours in words. NeuroReport, 12, 3189-3191.
29. Fuchs, C., & Marchello-Nizia, C. (1998). Les opérations de thématisation en français. Cahiers de praxématique. Montpellier: Praxiling.
30. Gunter, T. C., Stowe, L. A., & Mulder, G. (1997). When syntax meets semantics. Psychophysiology, 34, 660-676.
31. Hagoort, P. (2003). Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 883-899.
32. Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., & Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 439-483.
33. Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis. Early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 194-205.
34. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Spoken and written language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Hirst, D. J., & Di Cristo, A. (1998). A survey of intonation systems. In D. J. Hirst & A. Di Cristo (Eds.), Intonation systems: A survey of twenty languages (pp. 1-44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Hirst, D. J., & Espesser, R. (1993). Automatic modelling of fundamental frequency using a quadratic spline function, Travaux de l'Institut de Phonetique d'Aix, 15, 71-85.
37. Holcomb, P. J., & Neville, H. (1990). Auditory and visual semantic priming in lexical decision: A comparison using event-related brain potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5, 281-312.
38. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205.
39. Kutas, M., McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1977). Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science, 197, 792-795.
40. Lacheret-Dujour, A., & Beaugendre, F. (1999). La prosodie du français. Paris: CNRS.
41. Ladd, D. R. (1980). The structure of intonational meaning, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
42. Ladd, D. R. (1991). Integrating syntagmatic and paradigmatic aspects of stress. Actes du 12ème Congrès International des Sciences Phonétiques (pp. 283-287). Aix-en-Provence, France: Université de Provence.
43. Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge studies in linguistics (Vol. 71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. McCallum, W. C., Farmer, S. F., & Pocock, P. V. (1984). The effects of physical and semantic incongruities on auditory event-related potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 59, 477-488.
45. Morel, M., & Lacheret, A. (2001). Kali, synthèse vocale à partir du texte: De la conception à la mise en oeuvre. In Ch. D'Alessandro (Ed.), Traitement automatique des langues, synthèse de la parole à partir du texte (Vol. 42, pp. 193-221). Paris: Hermès.
46. Most, R. B., & Saltz, E. (1979). Information structure in sentences: New information. Language and Speech, 22, 89-95.
47. Osterhout, L. (1997). On the brain response to syntactic anomalies: Manipulations of word position and word class reveal individual differences. Brain and Language, 59, 494-522.
48. Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 785-804.
49. Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1993). Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 413-437.
50. Osterhout, L., & Nicol, J. (1999). On the distinctiveness, independence, and time course of the brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 283-317.
51. Pasdeloup, V. (1990). Modèle de règles rythmiques du français appliqué à la synthèse de la parole. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Provence, Marseille, France.
52. Picton, T. W. (1992). The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 9, 456-479.
53. Prévost, P. (2001). La variabilité morphologique en français langue seconde. Langues et linguistique, 27, 1-28.
54. Prince, E. F. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 223-255). New York: Academic Press.
55. Schirmer, A., Kotz, S. A., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Sex differentiates the role of emotional prosody during word processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 228-233.
56. Séguinot, A. (1976). L'accent d'insistance en français standard. Studia Phonetica, 12, 1-58.
57. Selkirk, E. (2002). Contrastive FOCUS vs. presentational focus: Prosodic evidence from right node raising in English. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Speech Prosody (pp. 643-646). Aix-en-Provence, France: Université de Provence.
58. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). La pertinence. Paris: de Minuit.
59. Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 191-196.
60. Steinhauer, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Prosodic boundaries, comma rules, and brain responses: The closure positive shift in ERPs as a universal marker for prosodic phrasing in listeners and readers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 267-295.
61. Terken, J., & Hirscheberg, J. (1994). Deaccentuation of words representing "given" information: Effects of persistence of grammatical function and surface position. Language and Speech, 37, 125-145.
62. Terken, J., & Nooteboom, S. G. (1987). Opposite effects of accentuation and deaccentuation on verification latencies for given and new information. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 145-163.
63. Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1990). Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Memory and Cognition, 18, 380-393.
64. Venditti, J. J., & Hirschberg, J. (2003). Intonation and discourse processing. Proceedings of the international congress of phonetic sciences (pp. 315-318). Barcelona, Spain: Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.
65. Venditti, J. J., Stone, M., Nanda, P., & Tepper, P. (2002). Discourse constraints on the interpretation of nuclear-accented pronouns. Proceedings of speech prosody (pp. 83-88). Aix-en-Provence, France: Université de Provence.
66. Walter, W. G., Cooper, R., Aldridge, V. J., McCallum, W. C., & Winter, A. L. (1964). Contingent negative variation: An electrical sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature, 203, 380-384.