Randomised controlled trial comparing two methods of acetabular cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty

HIP International

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 137-142

  Vendittoli, Pasca I André ^a,c   Ganapathi, M ^a   Duval, N ^b   Lavoie, P ^b   Roy, A ^a   Lavigne, M ^a  

^a MAISONNEUVE ROSEMONT HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b NONE   (Canada)

^c NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Abduction angle; Acetabulum; Hip prosthesis; Inclinometer

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ACETABULUM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 36549019519     PISSN: 11207000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5301/HIP.2008.658     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Kavanagh BF, Wallrichs S, Dewitz M, et al. Charnley low-friction arthroplasty of the hip: twenty-year results with cement. J Arthroplasty 1994; 9: 229-34.
2. Wiklund I, Romanus B. A comparison of quality of life before and after arthroplasty in patients who had arthrosis of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73: 765-9.
3. Laupacis A, Bourne R, Rorabeck C, et al. The effect of elective total hip replacement on health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75: 1619-26.
4. Daly PJ, Morrey BF. Operative correction of an unstable total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992; 74: 1334-43.
5. McCollum DE, Gray WJ. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; 261: 159-70.
6. O'Brien S, Engela D, Leonard S, Beverland D, Kernohan G. A study of the factors in hip replacement dislocation: part 2. Nurs Stand 1996; 11: 39-42.
7. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978; 60: 217-20.
8. D'Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, Walker RH, Colwell CW Jr. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82: 315-21.
9. Kummer FJ, Shah S, Iyer S, DiCesare PE. The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14: 509-13.
10. Bader R, Willmann G. [Ceramic cups for hip endoprostheses: Part 6: cup design, inclination and antetorsion angle modify range of motion and impingement] [article in German]. Biomed Tech (Berl) 1999; 44: 212-9.
11. Bader R, Willmann G. [Ceramic acetabular cups for hip endoprostheses: Part 7: how do position of the center of rotation and the CCD angle of the shaft modify range of motion and impingement?] [article in German]. Biomed Tech (Berl) 1999; 44: 345-51.
12. Kurtz SM, Edidin AA, Barrel DL. The role of backside polishing, cup angle, and polyethylene thickness on the contact stresses in metal-backed acetabular components. J Biomech 1997; 30: 639-42.
13. Chen FS, Di Cesare PE, Kale AA, et al. Results of cemented metal-backed acetabular components: a 10-year-average follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13: 867-73.
14. Schmalzried TP, Guttmann D, Grecula M, Amstutz HC. The relationship between the design, position, and articular wear of acetabular components inserted without cement and the development of pelvic osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994; 76: 677-88.
15. McBroom R, Muller M. Aseptic loosening: fifteen years experience with the Muller total hip arthroplasty. Proceedings of the 39th Canadian Orthopeadic Association Meeting, Québec, 1983. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1984; 66: 300.
16. Kennedy JG, Rogers WB, Soffe KE, Sullivan RJ, Griffen DG, Sheehan LJ. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13: 530-4.
17. Kummer FJ, Stuchin SA, Frankel VH. Analysis of removed autophor ceramic-on-ceramic components. J Arthroplasty 1990; 5: 28-33.
18. Dorlot JM, Christel P, Meunier A. Wear analysis of retrieved alumina heads and sockets of hip prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res 1989; 23 (suppl A3): 299-310.
19. Dowling JM, Atkinson JR, Dowson D, Charnley J. The characteristics of acetabular cups worn in the human body. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1978; 60: 375-82.
20. Boutin P, Christel P, Dorlot JM, et al. The use of dense alumina-alumina ceramic combination in total hip replacement. J Biomed Mater Res 1988; 22: 1203-32.
21. Maistrelli G, Gerundini M, Bombelli R. The inclination of the weight bearing surface in the hip joint: the clinical significance of abnormal force Orthop Rev 1986; 15: 271-9.
22. Salvati EA, Im VC, Aglietti P, Wilson PD Jr. Radiology of total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976; 121: 74-82.
23. Sedel L. Ceramic hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992; 74: 331-2.
24. Sedel L, Kerboull L, Christel P, Meunier A, Witvoet J. Alumina-on-alumina hip replacement: results and survivorship in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990; 72: 658-63.
25. Seki M, Yuasa N, Ohkuni K. Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation. J Orthop Res 1998; 16: 513-7.
26. Harkess W. Campbell's operative orthopaedics: arthroplasty of the hip. St Louis: Mosby 1998; 535.
27. Imura S. Biomechanics of total hip arthroplasty. East Jpn J Clin Orthop 1995; 7: 609-15.
28. Hassan DM, Johnston GH, Dust WN, Watson G, Dolovich AT. Accuracy of intraoperative assessment of acetabular prosthesis placement. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13: 80-4.
29. Digioia AM 3rd, Jaramaz B, Plakseychuk AY, et al. Comparison of a mechanical acetabular alignment guide with computer placement of the socket. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17: 359-64.
30. Vendittoli PA, Duval N, Stitson DJ, Masse B. Vertical acetabular positioning with an inclinometer in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17: 936-41.
31. Herrlin K, Pettersson H, Selvik G. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional methods for assessment of orientation of the total hip prosthesis. Acta Radiol 1988; 29: 357-61.
32. Seller R, Lyles D, Dorr L. The effect of pelvic on alpha and theta angles in total hip arthroplasty. Contemp Orthop 1988; 17: 67-70.
33. SAS. Version 8.2. Cary, NC (USA): SAS Institute.
34. Sharp I. Acetabular dysplasia: the acetabular angle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1961; 43: 268-72.
35. Moran KM, Ness K, Finkbeiner AA. Visual estimation of angles by orthopedic surgeons. Am J Orthop 2000; 29: 361-2 (discussion 363).
36. Pollard JA, Daum WJ, Uchida T. Can simple radiographs be predictive of total hip dislocation? J Arthroplasty 1995; 10: 800-4.
37. Pettersson H, Gentz CF, Lindbèrg HO, Carlsson AS. Radiologic evaluation of the position of the acetabular component of the total hip prosthesis. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1982; 23 (3A): 259-63.
38. Del Schutte H Jr, Lipman AJ, Bannar SM, Livermore JT, Ilstrup D, Morrey BF. Effects of acetabular abduction on cup wear rates in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13: 621-6.
39. Nizard RS, Sedel L, Christel P, Meunier A, Soudry M, Witvoet J. Ten-year survivorship of cemented ceramic-ceramic total hip prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992; 282: 53-63.