The P300 is sensitive to concealed face recognition

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 231-237

  Meijer, Ewout H ^a   Smulders, Fren T Y ^a   Merckelbach, Harald L G J ^a   Wolf, Ann G ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

P300, Guilty knowledge test, Concealed Information Test, Face recognition, Lie detection

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FACE PROFILE; FACIES; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; RECOGNITION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; E1A-ASSOCIATED P300 PROTEIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 36549002148     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Allen J.J., Iacono W.G., and Danielson K.D. The identification of concealed memories using the event-related potential and implicit behavioral measures: a methodology for prediction in the face of individual differences. Psychophysiology 29 (1992) 504-522
2. Begleiter H., Porjesz B., and Wang W. Event-related brain potentials differentiate priming and recognition to familiar and unfamiliar faces. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 94 (1995) 41-49
3. Ben Shakhar G., Bar Hillel M., and Kremnitzer M. Trial by polygraph: reconsidering the use of the guilty knowledge technique in court. Law Hum. Behav. 26 (2002) 527-541
4. Bennington J.Y., and Polich J. Comparison of P300 from passive and active tasks for auditory and visual stimuli. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 34 (1999) 171-177
5. Bentin S., Allison T., Puce A., Perez E., and McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 8 (1996) 551-565
6. Berlad I., and Pratt H. P300 in response to the subject's own name. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 96 (1995) 472-474
7. Bobes M.A., Lopera F., Comas L.D., Galan L., Carbonell F., Bringas M.L., et al. Brain potentials reflect residual face processing in a case of prosopagnosia. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 21 (2004) 691-718
8. Breen N., Caine D., and Coltheart M. Models of face recognition and delusional misidentification: a critical review. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 17 (2000) 55-71
9. Castro A., and Diaz F. Effect of the relevance and position of the target stimuli on P300 and reaction time. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 41 (2001) 43-52
10. Donchin E., and Coles M. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?. Behav. Brain Sci. 11 (1988) 357-374
11. Elaad E. The challenge of the Concealed Knowledge Polygraph Test. Expert Evid. 6 (1998) 161-187
12. Ellis H.D., and Lewis M.B. Capgras delusion: a window on face recognition. Trends. Cogn. Sci. 5 (2001) 149-156
13. Ellwanger J., Rosenfeld J.P., Sweet J.J., and Bhatt M. Detecting simulated amnesia for autobiographical and recently learned information using the P300 event-related potential. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 23 (1996) 9-23
14. Farwell L.A., and Donchin E. The truth will out: interrogative polygraphy ("lie detection") with event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 28 (1991) 531-547
15. Gray H.M., Ambady N., Lowenthal W.T., and Deldin P. P300 as an index of attention to self-relevant stimuli. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 40 (2004) 216-224
16. Henson R.N., Goshen-Gottstein Y., Ganel T., Otten L.J., Quayle A., and Rugg M.D. Electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of face perception, recognition and priming. Cereb. Cortex 13 (2003) 793-805
17. Iacono W.G. Detection of deception. In: Cacioppo J.T., Tassinary L.G., and Berntson G.G. (Eds). Handbook of Psychophysiology (2007), Cambridge University Press, New York 688-703
18. Ito T., and Cacioppo J.T. Electrophysiological evidence of implicit and explicit categorization processes. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 36 (2000) 660-676
19. Johnson Jr. R. On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related potential. Psychophysiology 30 (1993) 90-97
20. Joyce C.A., and Kutas M. Event-related potential correlates of long-term memory for briefly presented faces. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17 (2005) 757-767
21. Luck S.J. An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique (2005), The MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma
22. Miyake Y., Mizutani M., and Yamahura T. Event-related potentials as an indicator of detecting information in field polygraph examinations. Polygraph 22 (1993) 131-149
23. National Research Council. The Polygraph and Lie Detection. Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education (2003), The National Academic Press, Washington, DC
24. Ninomiya H., Onitsuka T., Chen C., Sato E., and Tashiro N. P300 in response to the subject's own face. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 52 (1998) 519-522
25. Paller K.A., Bozic V.S., Ranganath C., Grabowecky M., and Yamada S. Brain waves following remembered faces index conscious recollection. Cogn. Brain. Res. 7 (1999) 519-531
26. Paller K.A., Gonsalves B., Grabowecky M., Bozic V.S., and Yamada S. Electrophysiological correlates of recollecting faces of known and unknown individuals. Neuroimage 11 (2000) 98-110
27. Paller K.A., Ranganath C., Gonsalves B., LaBar K.S., Parrish T.B., Gitelman D.R., et al. Neural correlates of person recognition. Learn. Mem. 10 (2003) 253-260
28. Podlesney J.A. Is the guilty knowledge technique applicable in criminal investigations? A review of FBI case records. Cime Lab. Dig. 20 (1993) 57-61
29. Podlesney J.A. A paucity of operable case facts restricts applicability of the guilty knowledge technique in FBI criminal polygraph examinations. Forensic Sci. Commun. 5 (2003). http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/fsc/backissu/july2003/index.htm Retrieved April, 16, 2007 from http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/fsc/backissu/july2003/index.htm
30. Polich J. Comparison of P300 from a passive tone sequence paradigm and an active discrimination task. Psychophysiology 24 (1987) 41-46
31. Polich J. P300 from a passive auditory paradigm. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 74 (1989) 312-320
32. Read W., Nenov V.I., and Halgren E. Role of inhibition in memory retrieval by hippocampal area CA3. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 18 (1994) 55-68
33. Renault B., Signoret J.L., Debruille B., Breton F., and Bolgert F. Brain potentials reveal covert facial recognition in prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia 27 (1989) 905-912
34. Rosenfeld J.P. Event-related potentials in the detection of deception, malingering, and false memories. In: Kleiner M. (Ed). Handbook of Polygraph Testing (2002), Academic Press, San Diego, Ca 265-286
35. Rosenfeld J.P. Brain fingerprinting: a critical analysis. Sci. Rev. Ment. Health Pract. 4 (2005) 20-37
36. Rosenfeld J.P., Ellwanger J., and Sweet J. Detecting simulated amnesia with event-related brain potentials. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 19 (1995) 1-11
37. Rosenfeld J.P., Cantwell B., Nasman V.T., Wojdac V., Ivanov S., and Mazzeri L. A modified, event-related potential-based guilty knowledge test. Int. J. Neurosci. 42 (1988) 157-161
38. Rosenfeld J.P., Soskins M., Bosh G., and Ryan A. Simple, effective countermeasures to P300-based tests of detection of concealed information. Psychophysiology 41 (2004) 205-219
39. Rosenfeld J.P., Biroschak J.R., and Furedy J.J. P300-based detection of concealed autobiographical versus incidentally acquired information in target and non-target paradigms. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 60 (2006) 251-259
40. Rosenfeld J.P., Shue E., and Singer E. Single versus multiple probe blocks of P300-based concealed information tests for self-referring versus incidentally obtained information. Biol. Psychol. 74 (2007) 396-404
41. Schupp H.T., Cuthbert B.N., Bradley M.M., Cacioppo J.T., Ito T., and Lang P.J. Affective picture processing: the late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance. Psychophysiology 37 (2000) 257-261
42. Schweinberger S.R., and Burton A.M. Covert recognition and the neural system for face processing. Cortex 39 (2003) 9-30
43. Schweinberger S.R., Pickering E.C., Burton A.M., and Kaufmann J.M. Human brain potential correlates of repetition priming in face and name recognition. Neuropsychologia 40 (2002) 2057-2073
44. Semlitsch H.V., Anderer P., Schuster P., and Presslich O. A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology 23 (1986) 695-703
45. Sommer W., Leuthold H., and Matt J. The expectancies that govern the P300 amplitude are mostly automatic and unconscious. Behav. Brain Sci. 21 (1998) 149-150
46. Soskins M., Rosenfeld J.P., and Niendam T. Peak-to-peak measurement of P300 recorded at 0.3 Hz high pass filter settings in intraindividual diagnosis: complex vs. simple paradigms. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 40 (2001) 173-180
47. Wasserman S., and Bockenholt U. Bootstrapping: applications to psychophysiology. Psychophysiology 26 (1989) 208-221