P300 in response to the subject's own face

Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 519-522

  Ninomiya, Hideaki ^a   Onitsuka, Toshiaki ^a   Chen, Chung Ho ^a   Sato, Eigo ^a   Tashiro, Nobutada ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Deviant stimulus; Event related potentials; Face; Orienting response; P300; Self relevance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN TISSUE; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; ORIENTING RESPONSE; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AROUSAL; ATTENTION; BODY IMAGE; CEREBRAL CORTEX; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; SELF CONCEPT;

EID: 0031735864     PISSN: 13231316     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1819.1998.00445.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Picton TW, Hillyard SA. Endogenous event-related potentials. In: Picton TW (ed.) Human Event-Related Potentials. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988; 376-390.
2. Duncan-Johonson CC, Donchin E. On quantifying surprise: The variation in event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology 1977; 14: 456-467.
3. Squires KC, Donchin E, Herning RI, McCarthy G. On the influence of task relevance and stimulus probability on event-related potentials. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1977; 42: 1-14.
4. Farwell LA, Donchin E. The truth will out: Interrogative polygraphy ('lie detection') with event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 1991; 28: 531-546.
5. Nasman VT, Rosenfeld JP. Parietal P3 response as an indicator of stimulus categorization: Increased P3 amplitude to categorically deviant target and nontarget stimuli. Psychophysiology 1990; 27: 338-350.
6. Moray N. Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instruction. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 1959; 11: 56-60.
7. Woldorf G, Morrison F. Processing of unattended visual information. Mem. Cogn. 1980; 8: 521-527.
8. Fishler I, Jin Y, Boaz TL, Perry NW, Childers DG. Brain potentials related to seeing one's own name. Brain Lang. 1987; 30: 245-262.
9. Berlad I, Pratt H. P300 in response to the subject's own name. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1995; 96: 472-474.
10. Onitsuka T, Ninomiya H, Chen C-H, Sato E. P300 in response to the subject's own voice. Jpn. J. EEG EMG 1997; 25: 243-248 (in Japanese).
11. Courchesne E, Hillyard SA, Galambos R. Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1975; 39: 131-143.
12. Courchesne E. Changes in P3 waves with event repetition: Long-term effects on scalp distribution and amplitude. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1978; 45: 754-766.
13. Squires NK, Squires KC, Hillyard SA. Two probabilities of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimulus in man. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1975; 38: 387-401.
14. Donchin E, Heffley E, Hillyard SA et al. Cognition and event-related potentials. II. The orienting reflex and P300. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1984; 425: 39-57.
15. Cycowicz YM, Friedman D. A developmental study of the effect of temporal order on the ERPs elicited by novel enviormental sounds. Electroenceph. Clin. Neuropysiol. 1997; 103: 304-318.
16. Katayama J, Polich J. P300, probability, and the three-tone paradigm. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1996; 100: 555-562.