Image postprocessing of aortic CTA and MRA;Aktuelle bildnachverarbeitung der aortalen CTA und MRA

Radiologe

Volumn 47, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1003-1011

  Von Tengg Kobligk, H ^a   Weber, T F ^a   Rengier, F ^a   Bockler D ^b   Schumacher, H ^c   Kauczor, H U ^a  

^a GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c Klinikum Stadt Hanau   (Germany)

Author keywords

Angiography; Aorta; Computed tomography (CT); Image postprocessing; Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; AORTA; AORTA DISSECTION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PATIENT REFERRAL; PATIENT SELECTION; PHYSICIAN; REPRODUCIBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC ANEURYSM, THORACIC; AORTIC DISEASES; AORTOGRAPHY; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HEMATOMA; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MARFAN SYNDROME; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 36448950148     PISSN: 0033832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00117-007-1583-8     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Mahesh M (2002) Search for isotropic resolution in CT from conventional through multiple-row detector. Radiographics 22: 949-962
2. Diehm N, Herrmann P, Dinkel HP (2004) Multidetector CT angiography versus digital subtraction angiography for aortoiliac length measurements prior to endovascular AAA repair. J Endovasc Ther 11: 527-534
3. Luccichenti G, Cademartiri F, Pezzella FR et al. (2005) 3D reconstruction techniques made easy: know-how and pictures. Eur Radiol 15: 2146-2156
4. Fink C, Ley S, Kroeker R et al. (2005) Time-resolved contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of the chest: combination of parallel imaging with view sharing (TREAT). Invest Radiol 40: 40-48
5. Heverhagen JT, Reitz I, Pavlicova M et al. (2007) The impact of the dosage of intravenous gadolinium-chelates on the vascular signal intensity in MR angiography. Eur Radiol 17: 626-637
6. Wintersperger B, Jakobs T, Herzog P et al. (2005) Aorto-iliac multidetector-row CT angiography with low kV settings: improved vessel enhancement and simultaneous reduction of radiation dose. Eur Radiol 15: 334-341
7. Lee MJ, Kim S, Lee SA et al. (2007) Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT. Radiographics 27: 791-803
8. Van der Schaaf I, van Leeuwen M, Vlassenbroek A, Velthuis B (2006) Minimizing clip artifacts in multi CT angiography of clipped patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27: 60-66
9. Huber A, Matzko M, Wintersperger BJ, Reiser M (2001) Reconstruction methods in postprocessing of CT- and MR-angiography of the aorta. Radiologe 41: 689-694
10. Ney DR, Fishman EK, Magid D, Kuhlman JE (1989) Interactive real-time multiplanar CT imaging. Radiology 170: 275-276
11. Lell MM, Anders K, Uder M et al. (2006) New techniques in CT angiography. Radiographics 26 [suppl 1]: S45-S62
12. Rubin GD, Dake MD, Semba CP (1995) Current status of three-dimensional spiral CT scanning for imaging the vasculature. Radiol Clin North Am 33: 51-70
13. Gerhards A, Raab P, Herber S et al. (2004) Software-assisted CT-postprocessing of the carotid arteries. Rofo 176: 870-874
14. Ferencik M, Ropers D, Abbara S et al. (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of image postprocessing methods for the detection of coronary artery stenoses by using multidetector CT. Radiology 243: 696-702
15. Kirchgeorg MA, Prokop M (1998) Increasing spiral CT benefits with postprocessing applications. Eur J Radiol 28: 39-54
16. Boskamp T, Rinck D, Link F et al. (2004) New vessel analysis tool for morphometric quantification and visualization of vessels in CT and MR imaging data sets. Radiographics 24: 287-297
17. Schreiner S, Paschal CB, Galloway RL (1996) Comparison of projection algorithms used for the construction of maximum intensity projection images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20: 56-67
18. Napel S, Rubin GD, Jeffrey RB jr (1993) STS-MIP: a new reconstruction technique for CT of the chest. J Comput Assist Tomogr 17: 832-838
19. Calhoun PS, Kuszyk BS, Heath DG et al. (1999) Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: theory and method. Radiographics 19: 745-764
20. Madabhushi A, Udupa JK (2006) New methods of MR image intensity standardization via generalized scale. Med Phys 33: 3426-3434
21. Persson A, Brismar TB, Lundstrom C et al. (2006) Standardized volume rendering for magnetic resonance angiography measurements in the abdominal aorta. Acta Radiol 47: 172-178
22. Herman GT, Liu HK (1977) Display of three-dimensional information in computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1: 155-160
23. Carrascosa P, Capunay C, Vembar M et al. (2005) Multislice CT virtual angioscopy of the abdomen. Abdom Imaging 30: 249-258
24. Verhoye JP, Sze DY, Ihnken K et al. (2006) Virtual angioscopy in type-A dissection: ascending aortic stent-graft repair. Ann Thorac Surg 82: 347
25. Böckler D, Allenberg JR, Kauczor HU, von Tengg-Kobligk H (2005) Images in vascular medicine. Postprocessing ,fly-through' of multislice computed tomography after thoracic endografting. Vasc Med 10: 61-62
26. Czum JM, Corse WR, Ho VB (2005) MR angiography of the thoracic aorta. Magn Reson Imaging Clin North Am 13: 41-64
27. Kabul HK, Hagspiel KD (2006) Cross-sectional vascular imaging with CT and MR angiography. J Nucl Cardiol 13: 385-401
28. Yu T, Zhu X, Tang L et al. (2007) Review of CT angiography of aorta. Radiol Clin North Am 45: 461-483
29. Ayuso JR, de Caralt TM, Pages M et al. (2004) MRA is useful as a follow-up technique after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms with nitinol endoprostheses. J Magn Reson Imaging 20: 803-810
30. Merkle EM, Klein S, Wisianowsky C et al. (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging versus multislice computed tomography of thoracic aortic endografts. J Endovasc Ther 9 [suppl 2]: II2-13
31. Gawenda M, Gossmann A, Kruger K et al. (2004) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography of 8 aortic stent-graft models. J Endovasc Ther 11: 627-634
32. Frydrychowicz A, Markl M, Harloff A et al. (2007) [Flow-sensitive in-vivo 4D MR imaging at 3T for the analysis of aortic hemodynamics and derived vessel wall parameters]. Rofo 179: 463-472
33. Barrett BJ, Parfrey PS (2006) Clinical practice. Preventing nephropathy induced by contrast medium. N Engl J Med 354: 379-386