|
Volumn 9, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2002, Pages
|
Magnetic resonance imaging versus multislice computed tomography of thoracic aortic endografts
a a a a a a a a |
Author keywords
Excluder endoprosthesis; Magnetic resonance angiography; Stent graft; Talent stent graft
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGED;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
CONFERENCE PAPER;
CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT;
ENDOPROSTHESIS;
FEMALE;
GRAFT PATENCY;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY;
MALE;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RELIABILITY;
STENT;
THORACIC AORTA;
THROMBUS;
AORTA DISEASE;
ARTICLE;
ARTIFACT;
BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
IMAGE QUALITY;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
RADIOGRAPHY;
VASCULAR PATENCY;
AORTA, THORACIC;
AORTIC DISEASES;
ARTIFACTS;
BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PHANTOMS, IMAGING;
STENTS;
TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;
VASCULAR PATENCY;
|
EID: 0036616890
PISSN: 15266028
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1177/15266028020090s202 Document Type: Conference Paper |
Times cited : (17)
|
References (30)
|