Flow-sensitive in-vivo 4D MR imaging at 3T for the analysis of aortic hemodynamics and derived vessel wall parameters;Die analyse aortaler hämodynamik und gefäßwand-parameter mittels fluss-sensitiver in-vivo 4D-MRT bei 3 Tesla

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 179, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 463-472

  Frydrychowicz, Alex ^a   Markl, M ^a   Harloff, A ^a   Stalder, A F ^a   Bock, J ^a   Bley, T A ^a   Berger, A ^a   Russe, M F ^a   Schlensak, C ^a   Hennig, J ^a   Langer, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aneurysm; Aorta; Hemodynamics flow dynamics; MR imaging; Vascular; Velocity mapping

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS; ANEURYSM; ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; BLOOD FLOW; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; THORACIC AORTA; VASCULAR DISEASE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AORTIC ANEURYSM, THORACIC; AORTIC COARCTATION; AORTIC DISEASES; ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MUSCLE, SMOOTH, VASCULAR; OSCILLOMETRY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE;

EID: 34248650952     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-962941     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Davies PF. Flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction. Physiol Rev 1995; 75: 519-560
2. Langille BL, O'Donnell F. Reductions in arterial diameter produced by chronic decreases in blood flow are endothelium-dependent. Science 1986; 231: 405-407
3. Glagov S, Weisenberg E, Zarins CK et al. Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med 1987; 316: 1371-1375
4. Cheng C, Tempel D, van Haperen R et al. Atherosclerotic lesion size and vulnerability are determined by patterns of fluid shear stress. Circulation 2006; 113: 2744-2753
5. Dake MD, Miller DC, Mitchell RS et al. The "first generation" of endovascular stent-grafts for patients with aneurysms of the descending thoracic aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 116: 689-703; discussion 703-704
6. Doss M, Balzer J, Martens S et al. Surgical versus endovascular treatment of acute thoracic aortic rupture: a single-center experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76: 1465-1469; discussion 1469-1470
7. Sprague EA, Steinbach BL, Nerem RM et al. Influence of a laminar steady-state fluid-imposed wall shear stress on the binding, internalization, and degradation of low-density lipoproteins by cultured arterial endothelium. Circulation 1987; 76: 648-656
8. Nerem RM. Vascular fluid mechanics, the arterial wall, and atherosclerosis. J Biomech Eng 1992; 114: 274-282
9. Kamiya A, Togawa T. Adaptive regulation of wall shear stress to flow change in the canine carotid artery. Am J Physiol 1980; 239: H14-H21
10. Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. Jama 1999; 282: 2035-2042
11. Tsuji T, Suzuki J, Shimamoto R et al. Vector analysis of the wall shear rate at the human aortoiliac bifurcation using cine MR velocity mapping. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 995-999
12. Moran PR. A flow velocity zeugmatographic interlace for NMR imaging in humans. Magn Reson Imaging 1982; 1: 197-203
13. Katoh M, Spuentrup E, Stuber M et al. MR-Koronarangiographie mit Inversionspuls zur Darstellung des koronaren Blutflusses. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: 173-178
14. Jager L, Hoffmann A, Werhahn KJ et al. Analyse und Korrektur von ballistokardiogenen EEG-Artefakten von im MR-Tomographen aufgezeichneten EEGs. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: 1059-1064
15. Bryant DJ, Payne JA, Firmin DN et al. Measurement of flow with NMR imaging using a gradient pulse and phase difference technique. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1984; 8: 588-593
16. Feinberg DA, Crooks LE, Sheldon P et al. Magnetic resonance imaging the velocity vector components of fluid flow. Magn Reson Med 1985; 2: 555-566
17. Underwood SR, Firmin DN, Klipstein RH et al. Magnetic resonance velocity mapping: clinical application of a new technique. Br Heart J 1987; 57: 404-412
18. Firmin DN, Nayler GL, Klipstein RH et al. In vivo validation of MR velocity imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987; 11: 751-756
19. Walker ME, Souza SP, Dumoulin CL. Quantitative flow measurement in phase contrast MR angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1988; 12: 304-313
20. Pelc NJ, Herfkens RJ, Shimakawa A et al. Phase contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Q 1991; 7: 229-254
21. Pelc NJ, Sommer FG, Li KC et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance flow imaging. Magn Reson Q 1994; 10: 125-247
22. Kunz RP, Oellig F, Krummenauer F et al. Anteil des frühen systolischen Flussanstiegs am antegrad fließenden Gesamtvolumen bei Phasenkontrast-Flussmessungen in Atemanhaltetechnik. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: 637-645
23. Schoenberg SO, Just A, Bock M et al. Noninvasive analysis of renal artery blood flow dynamics with MR cine phase-contrast flow measurements. Am J Physiol 1997; 272: H2477-2484
24. Schoenberg SO, Knopp MV, Bock M et al. Renal artery stenosis: grading of hemodynamic changes with cine phase-contrast MR blood flow measurements. Radiology 1997; 203: 45-53
25. Gutberlet M, Venz S, Kahl A et al. Flussquantifizierung in Hämodialyseshunts mittels Phasenkontrast-Magnetresonanzangiographie (PC-MRA) im Vergleich zur Duplexsonographie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1998; 169: 163-169
26. Dulce MC, Mostbeck GH, O'Sullivan M et al. Severity of aortic regurgitation: interstudy reproducibility of measurements with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging. Radiology 1992; 185: 235-240
27. Kilner PJ, Manzara CC, Mohiaddin RH et al. Magnetic resonance jet velocity mapping in mitral and aortic valve stenosis. Circulation 1993; 87: 1239-1248
28. Kozerke S, Schwitter J, Pedersen EM et al. Aortic and mitral regurgitation: quantification using moving slice velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 14: 106-112
29. Kozerke S, Hasenkam JM, Nygaard H et al. Heart motion-adapted MR velocity mapping of blood velocity distribution downstream of aortic valve prostheses: initial experience. Radiology 2001; 218: 548-555
30. Brenner LD, Caputo GR, Mostbeck G et al. Quantification of left to right atrial shunts with velocity-encoded cine nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20: 1246-1250
31. Varaprasathan GA, Araoz PA, Higgins CB et al. Quantification of flow dynamics in congenital heart disease: applications of velocity-encoded cine MR imaging. Radiographics 2002; 22: 895-905; discussion 905-906
32. Wang ZJ, Reddy GP, Gotway MB et al. Cardiovascular shunts: MR imaging evaluation. Radiographics 2003; 23: S181-194
33. Unser M. Splines. A Perfect Fit for Signal and Image Processing. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 1999; November: 22-38
34. Moore JA, Rutt BK, Karlik SJ et al. Computational blood flow modeling based on in vivo measurements. Ann Biomed Eng 1999; 27: 627-640
35. Stalder AF, Frydrychowicz A, Canstein C et al. Quantitative planar analysis of flow sensitive 3D CINE MRI. In Proc: ISMRM Workshop on Flow and Motion: Imaging Assessment of Cardiovascular and Tissue Mechanics, New York, USA. 2006
36. Mohiaddin RH, Kilner PJ, Rees S et al. Magnetic resonance volume flow and jet velocity mapping in aortic coarctation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 1515-1521
37. Steffens JC, Bourne MW, Sakuma H et al. Quantification of collateral blood flow in coarctation of the aorta by velocity encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 1994; 90: 937-943
38. Gutberlet M, Hosten N, Vogel M et al. Quantification of morphologic and hemodynamic severity of coarctation of the aorta by magnetic resonance imaging. Cardiol Young 2001; 11: 512-520
39. Pujadas S, Reddy GP, Weber O et al. Phase contrast MR imaging to measure changes in collateral blood flow after stenting of recurrent aortic coarctation: initial experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 72-76
40. Dinsmore RE, Wedeen VJ, Miller SW et al. MRI of dissection of the aorta: recognition of the intimal tear and differential flow velocities. Am J Roentgenol 1986; 146: 1286-1288
41. Bogren HG, Underwood SR, Firmin DN et al. Magnetic resonance velocity mapping in aortic dissection. Br J Radiol 1988; 61: 456-462
42. Chang JM, Friese K, Caputo GR et al. MR measurement of blood flow in the true and false channel in chronic aortic dissection. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991; 15: 418-423
43. Strotzer M, Aebert H, Lenhart M et al. Morphology and hemodynamics in dissection of the descending aorta. Assessment with MR imaging. Acta Radiol 2000; 41: 594-600
44. Kunz RP, Oberholzer K, Kuroczynski W et al. Assessment of chronic aortic dissection: contribution of different ECG-gated breath-hold MRI techniques. Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182: 1319-1326
45. Bogren HG, Mohiaddin RH, Yang GZ et al. Magnetic resonance velocity vector mapping of blood flow in thoracic aortic aneurysms and grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 110: 704-714
46. Bogren HG, Klipstein RH, Firmin DN et al. Quantitation of antegrade and retrograde blood flow in the human aorta by magnetic resonance velocity mapping. Am Heart J 1989; 117: 1214-1222
47. Kilner PJ, Yang GZ, Mohiaddin RH et al. Helical and retrograde secondary flow patterns in the aortic arch studied by three-directional magnetic resonance velocity mapping. Circulation 1993; 88: 2235-2247
48. Bogren HG, Buonocore MH. Blood flow measurements in the aorta and major arteries with MR velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994; 4: 119-130
49. Bogren HG, Mohiaddin RH, Klipstein RK et al. The function of the aorta in ischemic heart disease: a magnetic resonance and angiographic study of aortic compliance and blood flow patterns. Am Heart J 1989; 118: 234-247
50. Bogren HG, Mohiaddin RH, Kilner PJ et al. Blood flow patterns in the thoracic aorta studied with three-directional MR velocity mapping: the effects of age and coronary artery disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7: 784-93
51. Wentzel JJ, Corti R, Fayad ZA et al. Does shear stress modulate both plaque progression and regression in the thoracic aorta? Human study using serial magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 846-854
52. Steinman DA, Taylor CA. Flow imaging and computing: large artery hemodynamics. Ann Biomed Eng 2005; 33: 1704-1709
53. Lei M, Archie JP, Kleinstreuer C. Computational design of a bypass graft that minimizes wall shear stress gradients in the region of the distal anastomosis. J Vasc Surg 1997; 25: 637-646
54. Markl M, Schumacher R, Kuffer J et al. Rapid vessel prototyping: vascular modeling using 3t magnetic resonance angiography and rapid prototyping technology. Magn Reson Mater Phys 2005; 18: 288-292
55. Napel S, Lee DH, Frayne R et al. Visualizing three-dimensional flow with simulated streamlines and three-dimensional phase-contrast MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1992; 2: 143-153
56. Buonocore MH. Algorithms for improving calculated streamlines in 3-D phase contrast angiography. Magn Reson Med 1994; 31: 22-30
57. Bogren HG, Buonocore MH. 4D magnetic resonance velocity mapping of blood flow patterns in the aorta in young vs. elderly normal subjects. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10: 861-869
58. Bogren HG, Buonocore MH, Valente RJ. Four-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping of blood flow patterns in the aorta in patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease compared to age-matched normal subjects. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 19: 417-427
59. Wigstrom L, Ebbers T, Fyrenius A et al. Particle trace visualization of intracardiac flow using time-resolved 3D phase contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999; 41: 793-799
60. Wigstrom L, Sjoqvist L, Wranne B. Temporally resolved 3D phase-contrast imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36: 800-803
61. Markl M, Chan FP, Alley MT et al. Time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 17: 499-506
62. Markl M, Draney MT, Hope MD et al. Time-resolved 3-dimensional velocity mapping in the thoracic aorta: visualization of 3-directional blood flow patterns in healthy volunteers and patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004; 28: 459-68
63. Markl M, Harloff A, Zaitsev M et al. Time Resolved 3D MR Velocity Mapping at 3T: Improved Navigator Gated Assessment of Vascular Anatomy and Blood Flow. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007, im Druck
64. Kvitting JP, Ebbers T, Wigstrom L et al. Flow patterns in the aortic root and the aorta studied with time-resolved, 3-dimensional, phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: implications for aortic valve-sparing surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127: 16021-1607
65. Markl M, Draney MT, Miller DC et al. Time-resolved three-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping of aortic flow in healthy volunteers and patients after valve-sparing aortic root replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 130: 456-463
66. Hope MD, Levin JM, Markl M et al. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Four-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping in a healthy volunteer with pseudocoarctation of the thoracic aorta. Circulation 2004; 109: 3221-3222
67. Markl M, Frydrychowicz A, Harloff A et al. Flow Imaging of the Thoracic Aorta at 3T. In Proc: ISMRM Workshop on Flow and Motion: Imaging Assessment of Cardiovascular and Tissue Mechanics, New York, USA. 2006
68. Lotz J, Doker R, Noeske R et al. In vitro validation of phase-contrast flow measurements at 3 T in comparison to 1.5 T: precision, accuracy, and signal-to-noise ratios. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 21: 604-610
69. Michaely HJ, Nael K, Schoenberg SO et al. Die Machbarkeit von räumlich hoch-aufgelöster Magnetresonanzangiographie (MRA) der Nierenarterien bei 3.0 T. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: 800-804
70. Frydrychowicz A, Weigang E, Langer M et al. Flow-sensitive 3D magnetic resonance imaging reveals complex blood flow alterations in aortic Dacron graft repair. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2006; 5: 340-342
71. Frydrychowicz A, Weigang E, Harloff A et al. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Time-resolved 3-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping at 3 T reveals drastic changes in flow patterns in a partially thrombosed aortic arch. Circulation 2006; 113: e460-461
72. Frydrychowicz A, Schlensak C, Stalder AF et al. Ascending-Descending Aortic Bypass Surgery in Aortic Arch Coarctation: 4D MR Flow Analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 133: 260-262
73. Frydrychowicz A, Harloff A, Jung B et al. Time-Resolved 3D MR Flow Analysis at 3T: Insights into Major Hemodynamic Changes Associated with Aortic Pathologies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007; 31: 9-15
74. Frydrychowicz A, Dittrich S, Bley TA et al. Visualisation of blood flow through a patent arterial duct using time-resolved 3-dimensional, 3-directional phase contrast CMR at 3Tesla. Journal of Cardiovascular Magentic Resonance 2007, im Druck
75. Gluer CC, Barkmann R, Hahn HK et al. Parametric Biomedical Imaging - What Defines the Quality of Quantitative Radiological Approaches? Fortschr Rontgenstr 2006; 178: 1187-1201
76. Buonocore MH. Visualizing blood flow patterns using streamlines, arrows, and particle paths. Magn Reson Med 1998; 40: 210-226
77. Frydrychowicz A, Winterer J, Zaitsev M et al. Visualization of Femoral and Iliac Artery Hemodynamics Using Time-Resolved 3D Phase Contrast MRI at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007, im Druck
78. Wetzel S, Meckel S, Frydrychowicz A et al. In-Vivo Assessment and Visualization of Intracranial Arterial Hemodynamics with Flow Sensitized 4D MRI at 3T. Am J Neuroradiol 2007, im Druck
79. Oliver JM, Gallego P, Gonzalez A et al. Risk factors for aortic complications in adults with coarctation of the aorta. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 1641-1647
80. Richter Y, Edelman ER. Cardiology is flow. Circulation 2006; 113: 2679-2682