Additional evidence of attitudinal influences in performance appraisal

Journal of Business and Psychology

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 407-419

  Tziner, Aharon ^b   Murphy, Kevin R ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041593809     PISSN: 08893268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022982501606     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Banks, C., & Murphy, K. (1985). Toward narrowing the research-practice gap in performance appraisal. Personnel Psychology, 38, 335-345.
2. Becker, H. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66, 32-42.
3. Bernardin, H. J. & Orban, J. (1985). Leniency effect as a function of rating format, purpose for appraisal and individual differences. Presented at Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Boston.
4. Cleveland, J.N. & Murphy, K.R. (1992). Analyzing performance appraisal as goal-directed behavior. In G. Ferris and K. Rowland (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management, (Vol. 10, pp. 121-185). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5. Etzioni, A. (1975). A comparative analysis of complex organizations (rev. ed) New York: Free Press.
6. Fraye, L.A. & Latham, G.P. (1987). Application of social learning theory to employee self-management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 387-392.
7. Gould, S. (1979). An equity-exchange model of organizational involvement. Academy of Management Review, 4, 53-62.
8. Kane, J.S. & Kane, K.F. (1992). The analytic framework: The most promising approach for the advancement of performance appraisal. Human Resource Management Review, 2, 37-70.
9. Kelman, H. (1961). Process of opinion change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 57-78.
10. Locke, B. A., Frederick, E., Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1984). Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 241-251.
11. Longenecker, C., Sims, H. & Gioia, D. (1987). Behind the mask: The politics of employee appraisal. Academy of Management Executive, 1, 183-193.
12. Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171-194.
13. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1984). Testing the "side-bet theory" of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 372-378.
14. Mayer, R. C., & Schoorman, F. D. (1992). Predicting participation and production outcomes through a two-dimensional model of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 671-684
15. Murphy, K.R. & Cleveland, J.N. (1991). Performance appraisal: An organizational perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
16. Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
17. Murphy, K., Cleveland, J., Henle, C., Morgan, K., Orth, M & Tziner, A. (1996) Effects of proximal and distal context variables on performance appraisal quality: A model and framework for research. Proceedings of Fifteenth Biennial Applied Behavioral Sciences Symposium, US Air Force Academy (USAFA-TR-96-2). Colorado Springs, CO.
18. Napier, N. & Latham, G. (1986).Outcome expectancies of people who conduct performance appraisals. Personnel Psychology, 39, 827-837.
19. Riggs, M. L., Warka, J., Babasa, B., Betancourt, R., & Hooker, S. (1994). Development and validation of self-efficacy and outcome expectancy scales for job-related applications. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 793-802.
20. Salancik, G.R. (1977). Commitment and the control of organizational behavior and belief. In B. Staw and G. Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior. Chicago: St-Clair Press.
21. Snyder, M. (1974). The self monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537.
22. Staw, B. (1977). Two sides of commitment. Presented at the Annual Convention of the Academy of Management. Orlando.
23. Tannenbaum, S. I., Mathieu, J. E., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1991). Meeting trainees' expectations: The influence of training fulfillment on the development of commitment, self-efficacy, and motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 759-769.
24. Tziner, A. (1995). The relationship of some distal and proximal factors with the extent of use of political considerations in performance appraisal. In Preparation.
25. Tziner, A., Latham, G.P., Prince, B.S. & Haccoun, R. (1996). Development and validation of a questionnaire for measuring political considerations in performance appraisal. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 179-190.
26. Tziner, A., Murphy, K. & Cleveland, J. (1998). Impact of rater beliefs regarding performance appraisal and its organizational contexts on appraisal quality. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12, 457-467.
27. Villanova, P., Bernardin, H.J., Dahmus, S.A. & Sims, R.L. (1993). Rater leniency and performance appraisal discomfort. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 789-799.