Research streams in rater self-efficacy

Group and Organization Management

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 61-88

  Bernardin, H John ^a   Villanova, Peter ^b  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Leniency; Performance management; Raters; Rating behavior; Ratings; Self efficacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 12944260471     PISSN: 10596011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1059601104267675     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Argyle, M., & Kendon, A. (1967). The experimental analysis of social performance. In L. Berk-owitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 55-98). New York: Academic Press.
2. Austin, J. T., & Villanova, P. (1992). The criterion problem: 1917-1992. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 836-874.
3. Austin, J. T., Villanova, P., Kane, J. S., & Bernardin, H. J. (1991). Construct validation of performance measures: Issues, development, and evaluation of indicators. In G. R. Ferris & K. M. Rowland (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 9, pp. 159-233). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
4. Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 359-373.
5. Bernardin, H. J. (1978). Effects of rater training on leniency and halo errors in student ratings of instruction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 301-308.
6. Bernardin, H. J., & Beatty, R. S. (1984). Performance appraisal: Assessing human behavior at work, Boston: Kent.
7. Bernardin, H. J., & Buckley, M. R. (1981). A consideration of strategies in rater training. Academy of Management Review, 6, 205-212.
8. Bernardin, H. J., Buckley, M. R., Tyler, C. L., & Wiese, D. S. (2000). A consideration of strategies in rater training. In J. Ferris (Ed.) Research in personnel and human resource management (Vol. 18, pp. 221-274). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Bernardin, H. J., Cooke, D., Ross, S., & Villanova, P. (2000). Conscientiousness and agreeableness as predictors of rating leniency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 232-236.
10. Bernardin, H. J., Cooke, D., & Villanova, P. (1999, October). The relationship between the Big-Five personality factors, rating discomfort, and rating leniency. Paper presented at the meeting of Southern Management Association, Atlanta, GA.
11. Bernardin, H. J., & Russell, J. E. A. (1998). Human resource management: An experiential approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12. Bernardin, H. J., & Villanova, P. (1986). Performance appraisal. In E. Locke (Ed.), Generalizing from laboratory to field settings (pp. 43-62). Boston: Heath/Lexington.
13. Bernthal, P., Sumlin, R., Davis, P., & Rogers, B. (1997). Performance management practices survey report. Pittsburgh, PA: Development Decisions International.
14. Bowman, J. S. (1999). Performance appraisal: Verisimilitude trumps veracity. Public Personnel Management, 28, 557-576.
15. Coens, T., & Jenkins, M. (2000). Abolishing performance appraisals. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
16. Driver, R. S. (1942). Training as a means of improving employee performance rating. Personnel, 18, 364-370.
17. Dulebohn, J. H., & Ferris, G. R. (1999). The role of influence tactics in perceptions of performance evaluations fairness. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 288-303.
18. Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 12, 472-485.
19. Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17, 183-211.
20. Goldstein, I. L., & Musicante, G. R. (1986). The applicability of a training transfer model to issues concerning rater training. In E. Locke (Ed.), Generalizing from laboratory to field settings (pp. 83-98). Lexington. MA: Lexington Books.
21. Gosselin, A., Werner, J. M., & Halle, N. (1997). Ratee preferences concerning performance management and appraisal. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 8, 315-333.
22. Greguras, G. J., & Robie, C. (1998). A new look at within-source interrater reliability of 360-degree feedback ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 960-968.
23. Harris, M. M. (1994). Rater motivation in the performance appraisal context: A theoretical framework. Journal of Management, 20, 737-756.
24. Hauenstein, N. M. A. (1998). Training raters to increase the accuracy of appraisals and the usefulness of feedback. In J. W. Smithers (Ed.), Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice (Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Professional Practice Series, pp. 404-442). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25. Hauenstein, N. M. A., & Foti, R. J. (1989). From laboratory to practice: Neglected issues in implementing frame-of-reference rater training. Personnel Psychology. 42, 359-378.
26. Ilgen, D. R., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & McKellin, D. B. (1993). Performance appraisal process research in the 1980s: What has it contributed to appraisals in use? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 321-368.
27. Ilgen, D. R., & Feldman, J. (1983). Performance appraisal: A process focus. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 5, pp. 141-196). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
28. Ivancevich, J. (1979). Longitudinal study of the effects of rater training on psychometric error in ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology. 64, 502-508.
29. Jawahar, I. M. (2001). Attitudes, self-monitoring, and appraisal behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 875-883.
30. Jelley, B. (2004). Rater personality and performance-evaluation leniency. Doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
31. Kane, J. S., Bernardin, J. J., Villanova, P., & Peyrefitte, J. (1995). Stability of rater leniency: Three studies, Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1036-1051.
32. Kozlowski, S. W. J., Chao, G. T., & Morrison, R. F. (1998). Games raters play: Politics, strategies, and impression management in performance appraisal. In J. W. Smither (Ed.), Performance appraisal: State of the art (pp. 163-205). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33. Landy, F. J., & Farr, J. L. (1980). Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 72-107.
34. Latham, G. P., Wexley, K. N., & Pursell, E. D. (1975). Training managers to minimize rating errors on the observation of behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 550-555.
35. Miller, G. A., & Chapman, J. P. (2001). Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 40-48.
36. Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Napier, N., & Latham, G. (1986). Outcome expectancies of people who conduct performance appraisals. Personnel Psychology, 39, 827-837.
38. Neck, C. P., Stewart, G., & Manz., C. C. (1995). Thought self-leadership as a framework for enhancing the performance of performance appraisers. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 31, 278-302.
39. Smith, B., Hornsby, J. S., & Shirmeyer, R. (1996). Current trends in performance appraisal: An examination of managerial practice. SAM Advanced Management Journal 61, 10-15.
40. Smith, W. J., V. Harrington, K. V., & Houghton, J. D. (2000). Predictors of performance appraisal discomfort: A preliminary examination. Public Personnel Management, 29, 21-32.
41. Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related outcomes. A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240-261.
42. Sulsky, L. M., & Day, D. V. (1992). Frame-of-reference training and cognitive categorization: An empirical investigation of rater memory issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 501-510.
43. Sumlin, R. (1998). Performance management: Impact and trends. Pittsburgh, PA: Development Decisions International.
44. Thornton, G. C., & Zorich, S. (1980). Training to improve observer accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 351-354.
45. Tziner, A. (1999). The relationship between distal and proximal factors and the use of political considerations in performance appraisal. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14, 217-231.
46. Tziner, A., & Murphy, K. R. (1999). Additional evidence of attitudinal influences in performance appraisal. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13(3), 407-419.
47. Villanova, P. (1995, August). The prediction of rater leniency using individual difference measures. Paper presented at the 1995 meeting of the Academy of Management, Vancouver, Canada.
48. Villanova, P., Bernardin, H. J., Dahmus, S., & Sims, R. (1993). Rater leniency and performance appraisal discomfort. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 789-799.
49. Warmke, D. L., & Billings, R. S. (1979). Comparison of training methods for improving the psychometric quality of experimental and administrative performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 124-131.
50. Woehr, D. J., & Huffcutt, A. I. (1994). Rater training for performance appraisal: A quantitative review. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 189-205.