Brain networks subserving the extraction of sentence information and its encoding to memory

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 17, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 2899-2913

  Hasson, Uri ^a,c   Nusbaum, Howard C ^a,b   Small, Steven L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Deactivation; Default network; Encoding; Individual differences; Language; Semantic memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WORKING MEMORY;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MALE; MEMORY; NERVE NET; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 36248993411     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhm016     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Albrecht JE, O'Brien EJ. 1993. Updating a mental model: maintaining both local and global coherence. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 19(5):1061-1070.
2. Argall BD, Saad ZS, Beauchamp MS. 2005. Simplified intersubject averaging on the cortical surface using SUMA. Hum Brain Mapp. 27(1):14-27.
3. Badre D, Poldrack RA, Paré-Blagoev EJ, Insler RZ, Wagner AD. 2005. Dissociable controlled retrieval and generalized selection mechanisms in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Neuron. 47(6):907-918.
4. Bar-Hillel Y. 1964. Language and information. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley.
5. Binder JR, Frost JA, Hammeke TA, Bellgowan PS, Rao SM, Cox RW. 1999. Conceptual processing during the conscious resting state: a functional MRI study. J Cogn Neurosci. 11(1):80-95.
6. Binder JR, Liebenthal E, Possing ET, Medler DA, Ward BD. 2004. Neural correlates of sensory and decision processes in auditory object identification. Nat Neurosci. 7(3):295-301.
7. Blumenfeld RS, Ranganath C. 2006. Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex promotes long-term memory formation through its role in working memory organization. J Neurosci. 26(3):916-925.
8. Blumstein SE, Myers EB, Rissman J. 2005. The perception of voice onset time: an fMRI investigation of phonetic category structure. J Cogn Neurosci. 17:1353-1366.
9. Casasanto DJ, Killgore WD, Maldjian JA, Glosser G, Alsop DC, Cooke AM, Grossman M, Detre JA. 2002. Neural correlates of successful and unsuccessful verbal memory encoding. Brain Lang. 80:287-295.
10. Clark D, Wagner AD. 2003. Assembling and encoding word representations: fMRI subsequent memory effects implicate a role for phonological control. Neuropsychologia. 41(3):304-317.
11. Constable RT, Pugh KR, Berroya E, Mencl WE, Westerveld M, Ni W, Shankweiler D. 2004. Sentence complexity and input modality effects in sentence comprehension: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 22:11-21.
12. Craik FIM, Routh DA, Broadbent DE. 1983. On the transfer from temporary to permanent memory. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B. 302:341-359.
13. Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI. 1999. Cortical surface-based analysis I: segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage. 9(2):179-194.
14. Daselaar SM, Prince SE, Cabeza R. 2004. When less means more: deactivations during encoding that predict subsequent memory. Neuroimage. 23(3):921-927.
15. Desai R, Liebenthal E, Possing ET, Waldron E, Binder JR. 2005. Volumetric vs. surface-based alignment for localization of auditory cortex activation. Neuroimage. 26(4):1019-1029.
16. Duvernoy HM. 1991. The human brain: structure, three-dimensional sectional anatomy and MRI. New York: Springer-Verlag.
17. Ferstl EC, Rinck M, von Cramon DY. 2005. Emotional and temporal aspects of situation model processing during text comprehension: an event related study. J Cogn Neurosci. 17(5):724-739.
18. Ferstl EC, von Cramon DY. 2002. What does the frontomedian cortex contribute to language processing: coherence or theory of mind? Neuroimage 17:1599-1612.
19. Fischl B, van der Kouwe A, Destrieux C, Halgren E, Ségonne F, Salat DH, Busa E, Seidman LJ, Goldstein J, Kennedy D, et al. 2004. Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex. 14:11-22.
20. Fischl B, Salat DH, Busa E, Albert M, Dieterich M, Haselgrove C, van der Kouwe A, Killiany R, Kennedy D, Klaveness S, et al. 2002. Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron. 33:341-355.
21. Fischl B, Sereno MI, Dale AM. 1999. Cortical surface-based analysis II: inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage. 9(2):195-207.
22. Fletcher PC, Stephenson CME, Carpenter TA, Donovan T, Bullmore ET. 2003. Regional brain activations predicting subsequent memory success: an event-related fMRI study of the influence of encoding tasks. Cortex. 39:1009-1026.
23. Forman SD, Cohen JD, Fitzgerald M, Eddy WF, Mintun MA, Noll DC. 1995. Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold. Magn Reson Med. 33:636-647.
24. Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Corbetta M, Essen DCV, Raichle ME. 2005. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102:9673-9678.
25. Friederici AD. 2002. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends Cogn Sci. 6:78-84.
26. Gabrieli JDE, Poldrack RA, Desmond JE. 1998. The role of left prefrontal cortex in language and memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95(3):906-913.
27. Giraud AL, Truy E, Frackowiak RSJ, Grégoire MC, Pujol JF, Collet L. 2000. Differential recruitment of the speech processing system in healthy subjects and rehabilitated cochlear implant patients. Brain. 123(7):1391-1402.
28. Gold BT, Balota DA, Kirchhoff BA, Buckner RL. 2005. Common and dissociable activation patterns associated with controlled semantic and phonological processing: evidence from fMRI adaptation. Cereb Cortex. 15(9):1438-1450.
29. Gough PM, Nobre AC, Devlin JT. 2005. Dissociating linguistic processes in the left inferior frontal cortex with transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci. 25(35):8010-8016.
30. Gusnard DA, Raichle ME. 2001. Searching for a baseline: functional imaging and the resting human brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2(10):685-694.
31. Hagoort P, Hald L, Bastiaansen M, Petersson KM. 2004. Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science. 304(5669):438-441.
32. Hasson U, Nusbaum HC, Small SL. 2006. Repetition suppression for spoken sentences and the effect of task demands. J Cogn Neurosci. 18(12):2013-2029.
33. Hasson U, Simmons JP, Todorov A. 2005. Believe it or not: on the possibility of suspending belief. Psychol Sci. 16:566-571.
34. Humphries C, Willard K, Buchsbaum B, Hickok G. 2001. Role of anterior temporal cortex in auditory sentence comprehension: an fMRI study. Neuroreport. 12(8):1749-1752.
35. Indefrey P, Cutler A. 2004. Prelexical and lexical processing in listening. In: Gazzaniga MS, Editor. The cognitive neurosciences III. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press. p. 759-774.
36. Kao YC, Davis ES, Gabrieli JDE. 2005. Neural correlates of actual and predicted memory formation. Nat Neurosci. 8(12):1776-1783.
37. Keenan JM, Baillet SD, Brown P. 1984. The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav. 23:115-126.
38. Knauff M, Mulack T, Kassubek J, Salih HR, Green MW. 2002. Spatial imagery in deductive reasoning: a functional MRI study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 13:203-212.
39. Kuperberg GR, Lakshmanan BM, Caplan DN, Holcomb PJ. 2006. Making sense of discourse: an fMRI study of causal inferencing across sentences. Neuroimage. 33:343-361.
40. Long DL, Chong JL. 2001. Comprehension skill and global coherence: a paradoxical picture of poor comprehenders' abilities. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 27(6):1424-1429.
41. Mason M, Bar M. 2006. The default network and the unconstrained associative brain. Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society; 2006 Apr 8-11; San Francisco, CA.
42. Mason RA, Just MA. 2004. How the brain processes causal inferences in text: a theoretical account of generation and integration component processes utilizing both cerebral hemispheres. Psychol Sci. 15(1):1-7.
43. Mazoyer BM, Tzourio N, Frak V, Syrota A, Murayama N, Levrier O, Salamon G, Dehaene S, Cohen L, Mehler J. 1993. The cortical representation of speech. J Cogn Neurosci. 5(4):467-479.
44. McGuire P, Paulesu E, Frackowiak R, Frith C. 1996. Brain activity during stimulus independent thought. Neuroreport. 7(13):2095-2099.
45. McKiernan KA, D'Angelo BR, Kaufman JN, Binder JR. 2006. Interrupting the "stream of consciousness": an fMRI investigation. Neuroimage. 29(4):1185-1191.
46. McKiernan KA, Kaufman JN, Kucera-Thompson J, Binder JR. 2003. A parametric manipulation of factors affecting task-induced deactivation in functional neuroimaging. J Cogn Neurosci. 15(3):394-408.
47. Michael EB, Keller TA, Carpenter PA, Just MA. 2001. fMRI investigation of sentence comprehension by eye and by ear: modality fingerprints on cognitive processes. Hum Brain Mapp. 13:239-252.
48. Nichols T, Brett M, Andersson J, Wager T, Polinee J-B. 2005. Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic. Neuroimage. 25:653-660.
49. Nichols TE, Holmes AP. 2002. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum Brain Mapp. 15(1):1-25.
50. Noveck I, Goel V, Smith K. 2004. The neural basis of conditional reasoning with arbitrary content. Cortex. 40:613-622.
51. O'Brien EJ, Rizzella ML, Albrecht JE, Halleran JG. 1998. Updating a situation model: a memory-based text processing view. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 24(5):1200-1210.
52. Otten LJ, Henson RN, Rugg MD. 2001. Depth of processing effects on neural correlates of memory encoding: relationship between findings from across- and within-task comparisons. Brain. 124:399-412.
53. Otten LJ, Henson RN, Rugg MD. 2002. State-related and item-related neural correlates of successful memory encoding. Nat Neurosci. 5:1339-1344.
54. Otten LJ, Rugg MD. 2001a. Task-dependency of the neural correlates of episodic encoding as measured by fMRI. Cereb Cortex. 11:1150-1160.
55. Otten LJ, Rugg MD. 2001b. When more means less: neural activity related to unsuccessful memory encoding. Curr Biol. 11(19):1528-1530.
56. Paller KA, Wagner AD. 2002. Observing the transformation of experience into memory. Trends Cogn Sci. 6:93-102.
57. Poldrack RA, Wagner AD, Prull MW, Desmond JE, Glover GH, Gabrieli JDE. 1999. Functional specialization for semantic and phonological processing in the left inferior prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage. 10:15-35.
58. Raichle ME, Gusnard DA. 2005. Intrinsic brain activity sets the stage for expression of motivated behavior. J Comp Neurol. 493(1):167-176.
59. Reber PJ, Siwiec RM, Gitelman DR, Parrish TB, Mesulam MM, Paller KA. 2002. Neural correlates of successful encoding identified using functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci. 22:9541-9548.
60. Rodd JM, Davis MH, Johnsrude IS. 2005. The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity. Cereb Cortex. 15(8):1261-1269.
61. Saad ZS, Reynolds RC, Argall B, Japee S, Cox RW. 2004. SUMA: an interface for surface-based intra- and inter-subject analysis with AFNI. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging; 2004 Apr 15-18. IEEE Communications Society. 37. p. 1510-1513.
62. Schott BH, Richardson-Klavehn A, Henson RNA, Becker C, Heinze H-J, Duzel E. 2006. Neuroanatomical dissociation of encoding processes related to priming and explicit memory. J Neurosci. 26(3):792-800.
63. Shannon CE. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Sys Tech J. 27:379-423.
64. Shulman GL, Fiez JA, Corbetta M, Buckner RL, Miezin FM, Raichle ME, Petersen SE. 1997. Common blood flow changes across visual tasks: II. Decreases in cerebral cortex. J Cogn Neurosci. 9:648-663.
65. Singer M. 2006. Verification of text ideas during reading. J Mem Lang. 54:574-591.
66. Skipper JI, Nusbaum HC, Small SL. 2005. Listening to talking faces: motor cortical activation during speech perception. Neuroimage. 25:76-89.
67. St George M, Kutas M, Martinez A, Sereno MI. 1999. Semantic integration in reading: engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. Brain. 122:1317-1325.
68. Tulving E. 2001. Does memory encoding exist? In: Naveh-Benjamin M, Moscovitch M, Henry L, Roediger I, Editors. Perspectives on human memory and cognitive aging. Ann Arbor (MI): Edwards Brothers. p. 6-27.
69. Uncapher MR, Rugg MD. 2005. Encoding and the durability of episodic memory: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci. 25(31):7260-7267.
70. van Berkum JJA, Hagoort P, Brown CM. 1999. Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: evidence from the N400. J Cogn Neurosci. 11(6):657-671.
71. van Berkum JJA, Zwitserlood P, Hagoort P, Brown CM. 2003. When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. Cogn Brain Res. 17(3):701-718.
72. Vandenberghe R, Nobre AC, Price CJ. 2002. The response of left temporal cortex to sentences. J Cogn Neurosci. 14(4):550-560.
73. Virtue S, Haberman J, Clancy Z, Parrish T, Jung-Beeman M. 2006. Neural activity during inference generation. Cogn Brain Res. 1084:104-114.
74. Vogeley K, Bussfeld P, Newen A, Herrmann S, Happe F, Falkai P, Maier W, Shah NJ, Fink GR, Zilles K. 2001. Mind reading: neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self-perspective. Neuroimage 14(1):170-181.
75. Wagner AD, Koutstaal W, Maril A, Schacter DL, Buckner RL. 2000. Task-specific repetition priming in left inferior prefrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex. 10:1176-1184.
76. Wagner AD, Schacter DL, Rotte M, Koutstaal W, Maril A, Dale AM, Rosen BR, Buckner RL. 1998. Building memories: remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity. Science. 281:1188-1191.
77. Xu J, Kemeny S, Park G, Frattali C, Braun A. 2005. Language in context: emergent features of word, sentence, and narrative comprehension. Neuroimage. 25(3):1002-1015.