Different genetic requirements for repair of replication-born double-strand breaks by sister-chromatid recombination and break-induced replication

Nucleic Acids Research

Volumn 35, Issue 19, 2007, Pages 6560-6570

  Cortés Ledesma, Felipe ^a   Tous, Cristina ^a   Aguilera, Andrés ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; ENDONUCLEASE; FUNGAL DNA; NUCLEIC ACID BINDING PROTEIN; RAD51 PROTEIN; RAD52 PROTEIN; RAD59 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE ARREST; CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; CHROMOSOME BREAKAGE; CHROMOSOME REPLICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; IN VIVO STUDY; INVERTED REPEAT; MINICHROMOSOME; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SISTER CHROMATID; SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE;

CHROMATIDS; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; RAD51 RECOMBINASE; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE;

EID: 36148992972     PISSN: 03051048     EISSN: 13624962     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm488     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Resnick,M.A. and Martin,P. (1976) The repair of double-strand breaks in the nuclear DNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its genetic control. Mol. Gen. Genet., 143, 119-129.
2. Lisby,M., Rothstein,R. and Mortensen,U.H. (2001) Rad52 forms DNA repair and recombination centers during S phase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8276-8282.
3. Aylon,Y. and Kupiec,M. (2005) Cell cycle-dependent regulation of double-strand break repair: A role for the CDK. Cell Cycle, 4 259-261.
4. Ira,G. and Haber,J.E. (2002) Characterization of RAD51-independent break-induced replication that acts preferentially with short homologous sequences. Mol. Cell. Biol., 22, 6384-6392.
5. Cox,M.M., Goodman,M.F., Kreuzer,K.N., Sherratt,D.J., Sandler,S.J. and Marians,K.J. (2000) The importance of repairing stalled replication forks. Nature, 404, 37-41.
6. Michel,B., Flores,M.J., Viguera,E., Grompone,G., Seigneur,M. and Bidnenko,V. (2001) Rescue of arrested replication forks by homologous recombination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 8181-8188.
7. Paques,F. and Haber,J.E. (1999) Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 63, 349-404.
8. Gonzalez-Barrera,S., Cortes-Ledesma,F., Welhnger,R.E. and Aguilera,A. (2003) Equal sister chromatid exchange is a major mechanism of double-strand break repair in yeast. Mol. Cell, 11, 1661-1671.
9. Johnson,R.D. and Jasin,M. (2000) Sister chromatid gene conversion is a prominent double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells. EMBO J., 19, 3398-3407.
10. Kadyk,L.C. and Hartwell,L.H. (1992) Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics, 132, 387-402.
11. Sonoda,E., Sasaki,M.S., Morrison,C., Yamaguchi-Iwai,Y., Takata,M. and Takeda,S. (1999) Sister chromatid exchanges are mediated by homologous recombination in vertebrate cells. Mol. Cell. Biol., 19, 5166-5169.
12. Fasullo,M., Giallanza,P., Dong,Z., Cera,C. and Bennett,T. (2001) Saccharomyces cerevisiae rad51 mutants are defective in DNA damage-associated sisier chromatid exchanges but exhibit increased rates of homology-directed translocations. Genetics, 158, 959-972.
13. Fasullo,M.T. and Davis,R.W. (1987) Recombinational substrates designed to study recombination between unique and repetitive sequences in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 84, 6215-6219.
14. Cortes-Ledesma,F. and Aguilera,A. (2006) Double-strand breaks arising by replication through a nick are repaired by cohesin-dependent sister-chromatid exchange. EMBO Rep., 7, 919-926.
15. Sung,P., Trujillo,K.M. and Van Komen,S. (2000) Recombination factors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res., 451, 257-275.
16. Symington,L.S. (2002) Role of RAD52 epistasis group genes in homologous recombination and double-strand break repair. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 66, 630-670.
17. Klein,H.L. (1997) RDH54, a RAD54 homologue in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is required for mitotic diploid-specific recombination and repair and for meiosis. Genetics, 147, 1533-1543.
18. Shinohara,M., Shita-Yamaguchi,E., Buerstedde,J.M., Shinagawa,F,., Ogawa,H. and Shinohara,A. (1997) Characterization of the roles of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD54 gene and a homologue of RAD54, RDH54/TID1, in mitosis and meiosis. Genetics, 147, 1545-1556.
19. Malkova,A., Ivanov,E.L. and Haber,J.E. (1996) Double-strand break repair in the absence of RAD51 in yeast: A possible role for break-induced DNA replication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 7131-7136.
20. Davis,A.P. and Symington,L.S. (2004) RAD51-dependent break-induced replication in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol., 24, 2344-2351.
21. Fishman-Lobell,J., Rudin,N. and Haber,J.E. (1992) Two alternative pathways of double-strand break repair that are kinetically separable and independently modulated. Mol. Cell. Biol., 12, 1292-1303.
22. Lin,F.L., Sperle,K. and Sternberg,N. (1990) Intermolecular recombination between DNAs introduced into mouse L cells is mediated by a nonconseryative pathway that leads to crossover products. Mol. Cell. Biol., 10, 103-112.
23. Ivanov,E.L., Sugawara,N., Fishman-Lobell,J. and Haber,J.E. (1996) Genetic requirements for the single-strand annealing pathway of double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics, 142, 693-704.
24. Bartsch,S., Kang,L.E. and Symington,L.S. (2000) RAD51 is required for the repair of plasmid double-stranded DNA gaps from either plasmid or chromosomal templates. Mol. Cell. Biol., 20, 1194-1205.
25. Gonzalez-Barrera,S., Garcia-Rubio,M. and Aguilera,A. (2002) Transcription and double-strand breaks induce similar mitotic recombination events in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics, 162 603-614.
26. Malagon,F. and Aguilera,A. (2001) Yeast spt6-140 mutation, affecting chromatin and transcription, preferentially increases recombination in which Rad51p-mediated strand exchange is dispensable. Genetics, 158, 597-611.
27. Malkova,A., Signon,L., Schaefer,C.B., Naylor,M.L., Theis,J.F., Newlon,C.S. and Haber,J.E. (2001) RAD51-independent break-induced replication to repair a broken chromosome depends on a distant enhancer site. Genes Dev., 15, 1055-1060.
28. Signon,L., Malkova,A., Naylor,M.L., Klein,H. and Haber,J.E. (2001) Genetic requirements for RAD51- and RAD54-independent break-itiduced replication repair of a chromosomal double-strand break. Mol. Cell. Biol., 21, 2048-2056.
29. Aguilera,A. (2001) Double-strand break repair: Are Rad51/RecA DNA joints barriers to DNA replication? Trends Genet., 17, 318-321.
30. Petukhova,G., Stratton,S. and Sung,P. (1998) Catalysis of homologous DNA pairing by yeast Rad51 and Rad54 proteins. Nature, 393, 91-94.
31. Rattray,A.J. and Symington,L.S. (1995) Multiple pathways for homologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics, 139, 45-56.
32. Bai,Y. and Symington,L.S. (1996) A Rad52 homolog is required for RAD51-independent mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev., 10, 2025-2037.
33. Jablonovich,Z., Liefshitz,B., Steinlauf,R. and Kupiec,M. (1999) Characterization of the role played by the RAD59 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in ectopic recombination. Curr. Genet., 36, 13-20.
34. Bai,Y., Davis,A.P. and Symington,L.S. (1999) A novel allele of RAD52 that causes severe DNA repair and recombination deficiencies only in the absence of RAD51 or RAD59. Genetics, 153, 1117-1130.
35. Davis,A.P. and Symington,L.S. (2001) The yeast recombinational repair protein Rad59 interacts with Rad52 and stimulates single-strand annealing. Genetics, 159, 515-525.
36. Sugawara,N., Ira,G. and Haber,J.E. (2000) DNA length dependence of the single-strand annealing pathway and the role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD59 in double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell. Biol., 20, 5300-5309.
37. Dong,Z. and Fasullo,M. (2003) Multiple recombination pathways for sister chromatid exchange in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Role of RAD1 and the RAD52 epistasis group genes. Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 2576-2585.
38. Jackson,J.A. and Fink,G.R. (1981) Gene conversion between duplicated genetic elements in yeast. Nature, 292, 306-311.
39. Szostak,J.W. and Wu,R. (1980) Unequal crossing over in the ribosomal DNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature, 284, 426-430.
40. McEachern,M.J. and Haber,J.E. (2006) Break-induced replication and recombinational telomere elongation in yeast. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 75, 111-135.
41. Malkova,A., Naylor,M.L., Yamaguchi,M., Ira,G. and Haber,J.E. (2005) RAD51-dependent break-induced replication differs in kinetics and checkpoint responses from RAD51-mediated gene conversion, Mol. Cell. Biol., 25, 933-944.
42. VanHulle,K., Lemoine,F.J., Narayanan,V., Downing,B., Hull,K., McCullough,C., Bellinger.M., Lobachev,K., Pet6s,T.D. et al. (2007) Inverted DNA repeats channel repair of distant double-strand breaks into chromatid fusions and chromosomal rearrangements. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 2601-2614.
43. Arbel,A., Zenvirth,D. and Simchen,G. (1999) Sister chromatid-based DNA repair is mediated by RAD54, not by DMC1 or TID1. EMBO J., 18 2648-2658.
44. Rattray,A.J. and Symington,L.S. (1994) Use of a chromosomal inverted repeat to demonstrate that the RAD51 and RAD52 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae have different roles in mitotic recombination. Genetics 138, 587-595.
45. Kang,L.E. and Symington,L.S. (2000) Aberrant double-strand break repair in rad51 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol., 20, 9162-9172.
46. Rattray,A.J., McGill,C.B., Shafer,B.K. and Strathern,J.N. (2001) Fidelity of mitotic double-strand-break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A role for SAE2/COM1. Genetics, 158, 109-122.
47. Cortes-Ledesma,F., Malagon,F. and Aguilera,A. (2004) A novel yeast mutation, rad52-L89F, causes a specific defect in Rad51-independent recombination that correlates with a reduced ability of Rad52-L89F to interact with Rad59. Genetics, 168, 553-557.
48. Petukhova,G., Stratton,S.A. and Sung,P. (1999) Single strand DNA binding and annealing activities in the yeast recombination factor Rad59. J. Biol. Chem., 274, 33839-33842.