Controversies of instrumented surgery and pain relief in degenerative lumbar spine. Results of scientific evidence;Controversias de la cirugía instrumentada y el tratamiento del dolor lumbar por enfermedad degenerativa. Resultados de la evidencia científica

Neurocirugia

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 406-413

  Robaina Padrón, Francisco Javier ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DE GRAN CANARIA DR NEGRÍN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Chronic low back pain; Degenerative lumbar disease; Evidence based medicine; Spinal instrumentation

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; AUTHOR; BACKACHE; COCHRANE LIBRARY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; INDUSTRY; INFORMATION; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERVENTION STUDY; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; KNOWLEDGE; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR SPINE; LUMBAR SPINE DEGENERATION; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SPINE FUSION; SPINE SURGERY; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 36148968378     PISSN: 11301473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1130-1473(07)70266-X     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Andersosn, P., Tribus, C., Kitchel, S.: Treatment of neurogenic claudication by interspinous decompression: application of the x-stop device in patients with lumbar degerative spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 2006; 4: 464-471.
2. Andreula,, C., Simonetti, L., de Santis, F., et al.: Minimally invasive oxigen-ozone therapy for lumbar disc herniation. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2003; 24: 996-1000.
3. 3 versus periradicular steroidal infiltrations in lower back pain. Randomised controlled study. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2005; 26: 996-1000.
4. Bono, C., Lee, C.K.: Critical análisis of trens in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the past 20 years: Influence of technique of fusion rate and clinical outcome. Spine 2004; 29: 455-463.
5. Brox, J., Reikeras, O., Nygaard, O., et al.: Lumbar instrumented fusion campared with cognitive intervention and exersices in patients with chronic back pain after previous surgery fos disc herniation: A prospective randomized controlled study. Pain 2006; 122: 145-155.
6. Buric, J., Molino Lova, R.: Ozone Chemonucleolysis in nonconrtained lumbar disc herniations: A pilot study with 12 month follow-up. Acta Neurochirurgica 2005; 92: 93-97.
7. Burkus, J., Transfeldt, E., Kitchel, S., et al.: Clinical and radiographical outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic prortein-2. Spine 2002; 27: 2396-2408.
8. Carragee, E.: The surgical treatment of disc degeneration: is the race not the swift? Spine Journal 2005; 5: 587-588.
9. Cha, C., Boden, S. : Gene therapy applications for spine fusion. Spine 2003; 28: 74-78.
10. Deyo, R.: Spinal-fusion surgery the case for restraint. New England Journal of Medicine 2004; 5: 722-726.
11. Deyo, R.: Leytter to the editor. Spine Journal 2005; 5: 698-699.
12. Errico, T.: A fair balanced view of spine fusion surgery. Spine Journal 2005; 5: 698-699.
13. Errico, T.: Reply to Drs Deyo, Mirza and Nachemson. Spine Journal 2005; 5: 699-700.
14. Gibson, J., Waddell, G.: Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis: Updated Cochrane Review. Spine 2005; 30: 2312-2320.
15. Gómez de la Riva, A., Isla, A., Pérez-López, C., et al.: Causas de reintervención quirúrgica en pacientes con fijación lumbar intervenidos por estenosis de canal. Neurocirugía 2006;17: 232-239.
16. Heary, R.: Introduction to the Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine 2005; 2: 636.
17. Karppinen, J., Coronen, T, Malvivaara, A., et al: Tumor necrosis factor-alfa monoclonal antibody, inflimax, used to manage severe ciática. Spine 2003; 28: 750-753.
18. Koes, B.: Surgery versus intensive rehabilitation programs for chronic low back pain. BMJ 2005; 330: 1220-1221.
19. Lieberman, I.: Disc bulge bubble: Spine economics 101. Spine Journal 2004; 4: 609-613.
20. Muto, M., Andreula, C., Leonardi, M.: Treatment of herniated lumbar disc by intradiscal and intraforaminal oxigen-ozone inyection. Journal of Neuroradiology 2004; 31: 183-189.
21. Nachemson, A.: Industry and back pain and the back pain industry. International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine. New York; 2005. The Back Letter 2005; 20: 8.
22. Nachemson, A.:. Heed the evidence ! The Back Letter 2005; 20: 106-107.
23. Paradiso, R., Alexandre, A.: The different outcomes of patients with disc herniation treated by microdiscectomy or by intradiscal ozone injection. Acta Neurochirurgica 2005; 92: 139-142.
24. Polomano, R., Marcotte, P., Farrar, J.: Spinal fusion and cognitive intervention? In search of the answers. Pain 2006; 122: 4-5.
25. Resnick, D., Choudhri, T., Dailey, A., et al.: Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 1: introduction and methodology, J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 637-638.
26. Resnick, D., Choudhri, T., Dailey, A., et al.: Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 2; assessment of functional outcome. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 639-646.
27. Resnick, D., Choudhri, T., Dailey, A., et al: Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 3: assessment of economic outcome. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 647-652.
28. Resnick, D., Choudhri, T., Dailey, A., et al.: Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 4: radiographic assessment of fusion. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 653-657.
29. Resnick, D., Choudhri, T., Dailey, A., et al: Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 5: correlation between radiographical and functional outcome. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 658-661.
30. Resnick, D., Choudhri, T., Dailey, A., et al.: Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 6: magnetic resonance imaging and discography for patient selection for lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 662-669.
31. Resnick, D., Choudhri, T., Dailey, A., et al: Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 7: intractable low-back pain without stenosis or spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 670-672.
32. Resnick, D., Choudhri, T., Dailey, A., et al.: Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 8: lumbar fusion for diusc herniation and radiculopathy. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 673-678.
33. Resnick, D., Choudhri, T., Dailey, A., et al: Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 9: fusion in patients with stenosis and spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 679-685.
34. Resnick, D., Choudhri, T., Dailey, A., et al.: Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 10: fusion following decompression in patients with stenosis without spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 686-691.
35. Resnick, D., Choudhri, T., Dailey, A., et al: Guidelines for the performance effusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 11: interbody techniques for lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 692-699.
36. Resnick, D., Choudhri, T., Dailey, A., et al.: Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 12: pedicle screw fixation as an adjunct to posterolateral fusion for low-back pain. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 700-706.
37. Resnick, D., Choudhri, T., Dailey, A., et al.: Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 13: injection therapies, low-back pain, and lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 707-715.
38. Resnick, D., Choudhri, T., Dailey, A., et al: Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 14: brace therapy as an adjunct to or substitute for lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 716-724.
39. Resnick, D., Choudhri, T., Dailey A., et al.: Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 15: electrophysiological monitoring and lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 725-732.
40. Resnick, D., Choudhri, T., Dailey A., et al.: Guidelines for the performance effusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 16: bone graft extenders and substitutes. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 733-736.
41. Resnick,D., Choudhri, T., Dailey, A., et al.: Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 17: bone grow stimulators and lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 737-740.
42. Richards, J., Majumdar, S., Derek, P., et al.: The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermitted claudication. Spine 2005; 30, 744-749.
43. Robaina, F.: Manejo intervencionista de la ciática y del dolor lumbar postquirúrgico. Revista de la Sociedad Española del Dolor 1999; 6: 233-237.
44. Robaina-Padrón F.: Tratamiento quirúrgico del dolor de espalda. Surgical treatment of back pain. Actualizaciones en Dolor 2000; 1: 42-50.
45. Robaina, F.: Aspectos neuroquirúrgicos del tratamiento del dolor crónico en el tercer milenio. Las Unidades Multidisciplinarias del Dolor. Revista de la Sociedad Española del Dolor 2003; 10: 481-507.
46. Robaina, F.: Situación actual de la cirugía de la columna vertebral degenerativa aplicada al manejo del dolor lumbar cronico. Estenosis de canal. Discopatia degenerativa, resultados basados en la evidencia científica. Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor 2006; 3: 167-172.
47. Sanden, B., Olerud, C., Petren-Mallmin, M., et al.: Hydroxiapatite coating improves fixation of pedicle screws. A clinical study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84: 387-391.
48. Shah, R.: Industry support and correlation to study outcome for papers published in Spine. Spine 2005; 30: 1099-1104.
49. Szpalski, M.: Spine care in global world. A duality of Priorities. Spine 2006; 31: 1515-1519.
50. Thomé, C., Zevgaridis, D., Leheta., et al.: Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized coparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy and laminectomy. J Neursurg: Spine 2005; 3: 129-141.
51. Van Tulder, M., Muller, G., Balagué, F., et al.: European guidelines for the management of the chronic non-specific low back pain. European Commission Research Directorate General Cost Action B 13 Low Back: Guidelines for Its Management 2005.
52. Wiesel, S.: Lost in the Ozone Again. The Back Letter 2005.; 20: 66-67.
53. Wiesel, S.: Massive Spinal treatment industry on increasingly shaky ground? The Back Letter 2005; 20.
54. Wiesel, S.: Conflicts in spinal reserach. The back Letter 2006;21:37-41.
55. Zucherman, J., Hsu, K., Hartjen, C., et al.: A Multicenter, prospective, randomised trial evaluating the X Stop interespinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication. Two-year follow-up results. Spine 2005; 30: 1351-1358.