Causes of reoperations in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated with instrumentations;Causas de reintervención quirúrgica en pacientes con fijación lumbar intervenidos por estenosis de canal

Neurocirugia

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 232-239

  Gomez De La Riva A ^a   Isla, A ^a   Perez Lopez C ^a   Ortega, R ^a   Fernandez Miranda J C ^a   Heredero, J ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LA PAZ   (Spain)

Author keywords

Adjacent level; Instrumentation; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Reoperation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LAMINECTOMY; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; REOPERATION; TREATMENT FAILURE; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS;

EID: 33746306773     PISSN: 11301473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s1130-1473(06)70344-x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Abumi, K., Panjabi, M.M., Kramer, K.M.: Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spinal stability after graded facetectomies. Spine. 1990; 15: 1142-1147.
2. Akamaru, T., Kawahara, N., Tim Yoon, S.: Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis. Spine. 2003; 28: 1560-1566.
3. Arnoldi, C.C., Brodsky, A.E., Cauchoix, J., et al.: Lumbar spinal stenosis and nerve root entrapment syndromes. Definition and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976; 115: 4-5.
4. Booth, K.C., Bridwell, K.H., Eisenberg, B.A.: Minimum 5-year results of degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and instrumented posterior fusion. Spine. 1999; 24: 1721-1727.
5. Bridwell, K.H., Sedgewick, T.A., O'Brien, M.F.: The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord. 1993; 6: 461-472.
6. Brunon, J., Chazal, J., Chirossel, J.P., et al.: When is spinal fusion warranted in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis? Rev Rhum Engl Ed. 1996; 63: 44-50.
7. nd.: Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85: 2089-2092.
8. Carson, W.L., Duffield, R.C., Arendt, M., Ridgely, B.J., Gaines, R.W. Jr.: Internal forces and moments in transpedicular spine instrumentation. The effect of pedicle screw angle and transfixation-the 4R-4bar linkage concept. Spine. 1990; 15: 893-901.
9. Colak, A., Kutlay, M., Demircan, N.: MR imaging for early complications of transpedicular screw fixation. Eur Spine J. 1999; 8: 151-155.
10. Cunningham, B.W., Sefter, J.C., Shono, Y.: Static and cyclical biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw spinal constructs. Spine. 1993; 18: 1677-1688.
11. Davne, S.H., Myers, D.L.: Complications of lumbar spinal fusion with transpedicular instrumentation. Spine. 1992; 17: 184-189.
12. Esses, S.I., Sachs, B.L., Dreyzin, V.: Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation. A selected survey of ABS members. Spine. 1993; 18: 2231-2238.
13. Etebar, S., Cahill, D.W.: Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability. J Neurosurg. 1999; 90: 163-169.
14. Farber, G.L., Place, H.M., Mazur, R.A.: Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar fusions by plain radiographs and computed tomography. Spine. 1995; 20: 1494-1499.
15. Fischgrund, J.S., Mackay, M., Herkowitz, H.N.: 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine. 1997; 22: 2807-2821
16. Fox, M.W., Onofrio, B.M., Onofrio, B.M.: Clinical outcomes and radiological instability following decompressive lumbar laminectomy for degenerative spinal stenosis: a comparison of patients undergoing concomitant arthrodesis versus decompression alone. J Neurosurg. 1996; 85: 793-802.
17. France, J.C., Yaszemski, M.J., Lauerman, W.C., et al.: A randomized prospective study of posterolateral lumbar fusion. Outcomes with and without pedicle screw instrumentation. Spine. 1999; 24: 553-560.
18. Ghogawala, Z., Benzel, B.C., Amin-Hanjani, S., et al.: Prospective outcomes evaluation after decompression with or without instrumented fusion for lumbar stenosis and degenerative Grade I spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004; 1: 267-272.
19. Grob, D., Humke, T., Dvorak, J.: Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Decompression with and without arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995; 77: 1036-1041.
20. Hadjipavlou, A., Enker, P., Dupuis, P.: The causes of failure of lumbar transpedicular spinal instrumentation and fusion: a prospective study. Int Orthop. 1996; 20: 35-42.
21. Herkowitz, H.N., Kurz, L.T.: Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991; 73: 802-808.
22. Herkowitz, H.N.: Lumbar spinal stenosis: indications for arthrodesis and spinal instrumentation. Instr Course Lect. 1994; 43: 425-433.
23. Herkowitz, H.N.: Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine. 1995; 20: 1084-1090.
24. Jäger, M., Seller, K., Raab, P.: Clinical outcome in monosegmental fusion of degenerative lumbar instabilities: instrumented versus non-instrumented. Med Sci Monit. 2003; 9: 324-327.
25. Kimura, I., Shingu, H., Murata, M.: Lumbar posterolateral fusion alone or with transpedicular instrumentation in L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord. 2001; 14: 301-310.
26. Kumar, M.N., Baklanov, A., Chopin, D.: Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur Spine J. 2001; 10: 314-319.
27. Kuroki, H., Tajima, N., Kubo, S.: Clinical results of posterolateral fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases: a follow-up study of more than 10 years. J Orthop Sci. 2002; 7: 317-324.
28. Laine, T., Makitalo, K., Schlenzka, D.: Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion: a prospective CT study in 30 low back patients. Eur Spine J. 1997; 6: 402-405.
29. Lorenz, M., Zindrick, M., Schwaegler, P., et al.: A comparison of single-level fusions with and without hardware. Spine. 1991; 16: 455-458.
30. Marchesi, D.O., Aebi, M.: Pedicle fixation devices in the treatment of adult lumbar scoliosis. Spine. 1992; 17: 304-309.
31. Mardjetko, S.M., Connolly, P.J., Short, S.: Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. A meta-analysis of literature 1970-1993. Spine. 1994; 19: 2256-2265.
32. McAfee, P.C., Weiland, D.J., Carlow, J.J.: Survivorship analysis of pedicle spinal instrumentation. Spine. 1991; 16: 422-427.
33. McGuire, R.A., Amundson, G.M.: The use of primary internal fixation in spondylolisthesis. Spine. 1993; 18: 1662-1672.
34. Mullin, B.B., Rea, G.L., Irsik, R.: The effect of postlaminectomy spinal instability on the outcome of lumbar spinal stenosis patients. J Spinal Disord. 1996; 9: 107-116.
35. Narayan, P., Haid, R.W., Subach, B.R.: Effect of spinal disease on successful arthrodesis in lumbar pedicle screw fixation. J Neurosurg. 2002; 97: 277-280.
36. Pfeiffer, M., Hildebrand, R., Grande, M.: Evaluation of indication-based use of transpedicular instrumentations with different rigidity for lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective pilot study with 3 years of follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2003; 12: 369-377.
37. Pihlajamaki, H., Myllynen, P., Bostman, O.: Complications of transpedicular lumbosacral fixation for non-traumatic disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997; 79: 183-189.
38. Rahm, M.D., Hall, B.B.: Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with instrumentation: a retrospective study. J Spinal Disord. 1996; 9: 392-400.
39. Simmons, E.D. Jr, Simmons, E.H.: Spinal stenosis with scoliosis. Spine. 1992; 17: 117-120.
40. Thomsen, K., Christensen, F.B., Eiskjaer, S.P.: 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. The effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on functional outcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective, randomized clinical study. Spine. 1997; 22: 2813-2822.
41. Umehara, S., Zindrick, M.R., Patwardhan, A.G.: The biomechanical effect of postoperative hypolordosis in instrumented lumbar fusion on instrumented and adjacent spinal segments. Spine. 2000; 25: 1617-1624.
42. Wiltse, L.L., Radecki, S.E., Biel, H.M., et al.: Comparative study of the incidence and severity of degenerative change in the transition zones after instrumented versus noninstrumented fusions of the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord. 1999; 12: 27-33.
43. Zdeblick, T.A.: A prospective, randomized study of lumbar fusion. Spine. 1993; 18: 983-991