Present state of degenerative back surgery and its implications in the management of chronic lumbar pain, canal stenosis and degenerative disk disease. Evidence based outcomes;Situación actual de la cirugía de la columna vertebral degenerativa aplicada al manejo del dolor lumbar crónico. Estenosis de canal. Discopatia degenerativa, resultados basados en la evidencia científica

Revista de la Sociedad Espanola del Dolor

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 167-172

  Robaina, F J ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DE GRAN CANARIA DR NEGRÍN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Chronic low back pain; Evidence based medicine; Spinal instrumentation

Indexed keywords

CHRONIC PAIN; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; LOW BACK PAIN; REVIEW; SPINE SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS;

EID: 33750087584     PISSN: 11348046     EISSN: 11348046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Robaina FJ: Manejo intervencionista de la ciática y del dolor lumbar postquirúrgico. Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor 199; 6:233-237.
2. Robaina Padrón FJ. Tratamiento quirúrgico del dolor de espalda. Surgical treatment of back pain. Actualizaciones en Dolor 2000; 1: 42-50.
3. Robaina FJ: Aspectos neuroquirúrgicos del tratamiento del dolor crónico en el tercer milenio. Las Unidades Multidisciplinarias del Dolor. Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor 2003; 10: 481-507.
4. Karppinen J. Tumor necrosis factor-alfa monoclonal antibody, inflimax, used to manage severe ciatica. Spine 2003; 28: 750-753.
5. Lost in the Ozone Again. The Back Letter 2005; vol 20.
6. Bonetti M, Cotticelli B. Intraforaminal O2-O3 versus periradicular steroidal infiltrations in lower back pain. Randomised controlled study. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2005; 26: 996-1000.
7. Andreula C, Simonetti L, de Santis F, et al. Minimally invasive oxigen-ozone therapy for lumbar disc herniation. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2003; 24: 996-1000.
8. Buric J. Ozone Chemonucleolysis in nonconrtained lumbar disc herniations: A pilot study with 12 month follow-up. Acta Neurochirurgica 2005; (Supl) 92: 93-97.
9. Muto M, Andreula C, Leonardi M. Treatment of herniated lumbar disc by intradiscal and intraforaminal oxigen-ozone inyection. Journal of Neuroradiology 2004; 31: 183-189.
10. Paradiso R. and Alexandre A. The different outcomes of patients with disc herniation treated by microdiscectomy or by intradiscal ozone injection. Acta Neurochirurgica 2005; (suppl) 92: 139-142.
11. Lieberman IH. Disc bulge bubble: Spine economics 101. Spine Journal 2004;4: 609-613.
12. Nachemson AL. Industry and back pain and the back pain industry. International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine. New York; 2005.
13. Lieberman IH. Disc bulge bubble: Spine economics 101. Spine Journal 4: 609-613, 2004.
14. Massive Spinal treatment industry on increasingly shaky ground?. The Back Letter 2005; 20.
15. Koes B. Surgery versus intensive rehabilitation programs for chronic low back pain. BMJ 2005; 330: 1220-1.
16. Heary R. Introduction to the Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2:636.
17. Resnick D, Choudhri T, Dailey A, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 1: introduction and methodology. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2 :637-638.
18. Resnick D, Choudhri T, Dailey A, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 2: assessment of functional outcome. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 639-646.
19. Resnick D, Choudhri T, Dailey A, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 3: assessment of economic outcome. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005;2: 647-652.
20. Resnick D, Choudhri T, Dailey A, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 4: radiographic assessment of fusion. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2:653-657.
21. Resnick D, Choudhri T, Dailey A, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 5: correlation between radiographical and functional outcome. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 658-661.
22. Resnick D, Choudhri T, Dailey A, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 6: magnetic resonance imaging and discography for patient selection for lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 662-669.
23. Resnick D, Choudhri T, Dailey A, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 7: intractable low-back pain without stenosis or spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 670-672.
24. Resnick D, Choudhri T, Dailey A, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 8: lumbar fusion for diusc herniation and radiculopathy. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 673-678.
25. Resnick D, Choudhri T, Dailey A, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 9: fusion in patients with stenosis and spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 679-685.
26. Resnick D, Choudhri T, Dailey A, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 10: fusion following decompression in patients with stenosis without spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2:686-691.
27. Resnick D, Choudhri T, Dailey A, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 11: interbody techniques for lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 692-699.
28. Resnick D, Choudhri T, Dailey A, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 12: pedicle screw fixation as an adjunct to posterolateral fusion for low-back pain. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 700-706.
29. Resnick D, Choudhri T, Dailey A, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 13: injection therapies, low-back pain, and lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 707-715.
30. Resnick D, Choudhri T, Dailey A, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 14: brace therapy as an adjunct to or substitute for lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 716-724.
31. Resnick D, Choudhri T, Dailey A, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 15: electrophysiological monitoring and lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2: 725-732.
32. Resnick D, Choudhri T, Dailey A, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 16: bone graft extenders and substitutes. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2:733-736.
33. Resnick D, Choudhri T, Dailey A, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 17: bone grow stimulators and lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg: Spine 2005; 2:737-740.
34. Gibson J.N. and Waddell G. Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis: Updated Cochrane Review. Spine 2005; 30: 2312-2320.
35. Bono CM and Lee CK. Critical análisis of trens in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the past 20 years: Influence of technique of fusion rate and clinical outcome. Spine 2004;29:455-463.
36. Van Tulder M. European guidelines for the management of the chronic non-specific low back pain. European Commission Research Directorate General Cost Action B 13 Low Back: Guidelines for Its Management 2005.
37. Richards JC, Majumdar S, Derek P, et al. The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermitted claudication. Spine 2005; 30, 744-749.
38. Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA, et al. A Multicenter, prospective, randomised trial evaluating the X Stop interespinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication. Two-year follow-up results. Spine 2005; 30: 1351-1358.
39. Thomé C, Zevgaridis D, Leheta O, et al. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized coparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy and laminectomy. J Neursurg: Spine 2005; 3:129-141.
40. Burkus JK, Transfeldt EE, Kitchel SH, et al. Clinical and radiographical outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic prortein-2. Spine 2002; 27: 2396-2408.
41. Sanden B, Olerud C, Petren-Mallmin MP, et al. Hydroxiapatite coating improves fixation of pedicle screws. A clinical study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84: 387-391.
42. Cha CW, Boden SD. Gene therapy applications for spine fusion. Spine 2003; 28: 74-78.
43. Nachemson AL. Heed the evidence!. The Back Letter, 2005; 20: 106-107.