|
Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 129-141
|
Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy.
a a a a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DECOMPRESSION SURGERY;
DISABILITY;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW UP;
HEALTH STATUS;
HUMAN;
IMAGE PROCESSING;
INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD;
LAMINECTOMY;
LUMBAR VERTEBRA;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
PAIN;
PAIN ASSESSMENT;
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
RADIOGRAPHY;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
REOPERATION;
THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;
TIME;
VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL;
DISABILITY EVALUATION;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HEALTH STATUS;
HUMANS;
IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;
IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL;
INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD;
LAMINECTOMY;
LUMBAR VERTEBRAE;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PAIN;
PAIN MEASUREMENT;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
REOPERATION;
SPINAL STENOSIS;
TIME FACTORS;
TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;
|
EID: 33644686579
PISSN: 15475654
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.3171/spi.2005.3.2.0129 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (323)
|
References (0)
|