Defining a monophyletic Cardinalini: A molecular perspective

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 1014-1032

  Klicka, John ^a   Burns, Kevin ^b   Spellman, Garth M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Avian taxonomy; Cardinal grosbeaks; Cardinalini; Nine primaried oscines; Systematics

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME B; REDUCED NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE DEHYDROGENASE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; SONGBIRD;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; CYTOCHROMES B; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; NADH DEHYDROGENASE; PASSERIFORMES; PHYLOGENY;

AMAUROSPIZA; AVES; CARDINALINI; CARDINALIS; CARYOTHRAUSTES; CHLOROTHRAUPIS; CYANOCOMPSA; CYANOLOXIA; EMBERIZINAE; EMBERIZINI; FRINGILLIDAE; GRANATELLUS; HABIA; ICTERINI; PARKERTHRAUSTES; PASSERI; PASSERIDAE; PASSERINA (BIRDS); PERIPORPHYRUS; PHEUCTICUS; PIRANGA; PORPHYROSPIZA; RHODOTHRAUPIS; SALTATOR; SPIZA; THRAUPINI;

EID: 36148966908     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Arbogast B.S., Edwards S.V., Wakely J., Beerli P., and Slowinski J.B. Estimating divergence times from molecular data on phylogenetic and population genetic timescales. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33 (2002) 707-740
2. Beecher W.J. A phylogeny of the oscines. Auk 70 (1953) 270-333
3. Bledsoe A.H. Nuclear DNA evolution and phylogeny of the New World nine-primaried oscines. Auk 105 (1988) 504-515
4. Brandley M.B., Schmitz A., and Reeder T.W. Partitioned Bayesian analyses, partition choice, and the phylogenetic relationships of Scinid lizards. Syst. Biol. 54 (2005) 373-390
5. Broham L., and Penny D. The modern Molecular Clock. Nature Rev. Genet. 4 (2003) 216-224
6. Burns K.J. Molecular systematics of tanagers (Thraupinae): evolution and biogeography of a diverse radiation of neotropical birds. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 8 (1997) 334-348
7. Burns K.J. Molecular phylogenetics of the genus Piranga: implications for biogeography and the evolution of morphology and behavior. The Auk 115 (1998) 621-634
8. Burns K.J., Hackett S.J., and Klein N.K. Phylogenetic relationships of neotropical honeycreepers and the evolution of feeding morphology. J. Avian Biol. 34 (2003) 360-370
9. Castoe T.A., and Parkinson C.L. Bayesian mixed models and the phylogeny of pitvipers (Viperidae: Serpentes). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 39 (2006) 91-110
10. Castoe T.A., Sasa M.M., and Parkinson C.L. Modeling nucleotide evolution at the mesoscale: the phylogeny of the neotropical pitvipers of the Porhtidium group (Viperidae: Crotalinae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 37 (2005) 881-898
11. Demastes J.W., and Remsen Jr. J.V. The genus Caryothraustes (Cardinalinae) is not monophyletic. Wilson Bull. 106 (1994) 733-738
12. Feduccia A. The Origin and Evolution of Birds (1996), Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, Conn
13. Fleischer R.C., McIntosh C.E., and Tarr C.L. Evolution on a volcanic conveyor belt: using phylogeographic reconstructions and K-Ar based ages of the Hawaiian Islands to estimate molecular evolutionary rates. Mol. Ecol. 7 (1998) 533-545
14. Garcia-Moreno J. Is there a universal mtDNA clock for birds?. J. Avian. Biol. 35 (2004) 465-468
15. Gillooly J.F., Allen A.P., West G.B., and Brown J.H. The rate of DNA evolution: effects of body size and temperature on the molecular clock. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 102 (2005) 140-145
16. Goldman N., Anderson J.P., and Rodrigo A.G. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 49 (2000) 652-670
17. Guindon S., and Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52 (2003) 696-704
18. Hackett S.J. Molecular phylogenetics and biogeography of tanagers in the genus Ramphocelus(Aves). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 5 (1996) 368-382
19. Harshman, J., 1996. Phylogeny, evolutionary rates, and ducks. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago.
20. Hellack J.J., and Schnell G.D. Phenetic analysis of the subfamily Cardinalinae using external and skeletal characteristics. Wilson Bull. 89 (1977) 130-148
21. Hellmayr, C.E., 1938. Catalogue of bird of the Americas. Field Muse. Of Nat. Hist. Publ. Zool., Series 13, Part II.
22. Hillis D.M., and Bull J.B. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method of assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42 (1993) 182-192
23. Huelsenbeck J.P. Performance of phylogenetic methods in simulation. Syst. Biol. 44 (1995) 17-48
24. Huelsenbeck J.P., and Crandall K.A. Phylogeny estimation and hypothesis testing using maximum likelihood. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28 (1997) 437-466
25. Huelsenbeck J.P., and Ronquist F.P. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17 (2001) 754-755
26. Jobb, G., 2005. TREEFINDER version of October 2005, Munich, Germany, By the author at www.treefinder.de.
27. Johnson K.P., and Sorenson M.D. Comparing molecular evolution in two mitochondrial protein coding genes (Cytochrome b and ND2) in the dabbling ducks (Tribe Anatini). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 10 (1998) 82-94
28. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitution through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Ecol. 16 (1980) 11-120
29. Klicka J., Johnson K.P., and Lanyon S.M. New World nine-primaried oscine relationships: constructing a mitochondrial DNA framework. The Auk 117 (2000) 321-336
30. Klicka J., Fry A.J., Zink R.M., and Thompson C.W. A cytochrome-b perspective on Passerina bunting relationships. The Auk 118 (2001) 611-623
31. Klicka J., Zink R.M., and Winker K. Longspurs and snow buntings: phylogeny and biogeography of a high latitude clade (Calcarius). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 26 (2003) 165-175
32. Klicka J., Voelker G., and Spellman G.M. A molecular phylogenetic analyses of the "true thrushes" (Aves: Turdinae"). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 34 (2005) 486-500
33. Kornegay J.R., Kocher T.D., Williams L.A., and Wilson A.C. Pathways of lysozyme evolution inferred from the sequences of cytochrome b in birds. J. Mol. Evol. 37 (1993) 367-379
34. Kumar S., Tamura K., and Nei M. MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief. Bioinform. 5 (2004) 150-163
35. Lanyon S.M. Phylogenetic frameworks: toward a firmer foundation for the comparative approach. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 49 (1993) 45-61
36. Leaché A.D., and Reeder T.W. Molecular systematics of the Eastern Fence Lizard (Sceloporus undulatus): a comparison of parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Syst. Biol. 51 (2002) 44-68
37. Lovette I.J. Mitochondrial dating and mixed support for the "2% rule" in birds. The Auk 121 (2004) 1-5
38. Lovette I.J., and Bermingham E. C-mos variation in songbirds: molecular evolution, phylogenetic implications, and comparisons with mitochondrial differentiation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17 (2000) 1569-1577
39. Lovette I.J., and Bermingham E. What is a wood-warbler? Molecular characterization of a monophyletic Parulidae. The Auk 119 (2002) 695-714
40. Lowery, G.H., Monroe Jr., B.L., 1968. Family parulidae. In: Paynter Jr., R.A. (Ed.), Check-list of birds of the world, vol. XIV, Muse. Of Comparative Zool., Cambridge, MA, pp. 5-93.
41. Martin A.P., and Palumbi S.R. Body size, metabolic rate, generation time, and the molecular clock. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90 (1993) 4087-4091
42. Mayr E., and Amadon D. A classification of recent birds. Am. Muse. Novit. 1496 (1951) 1-146
43. Paynter Jr., R.A., 1970. Subfamily Emberizinae, buntings and American sparrows. In: Paynter Jr., R.A., Storer, R.W. (Eds.), Check-list of birds of the world, vol. XIII. Muse. Of Comparative Zool., Cambridge, MA.
44. Pereira S.L., and Baker A.J. A mitogenomic timescale for birds detects variable phylogenetic rates of molecular evolution and refutes the standard molecular clock. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23 (2006) 1731-1740
45. Posada D., and Buckley T.R. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of Akaike information criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst. Biol. 53 (2004) 793-808
46. Posada D., and Crandall K.A. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14 (1998) 817-818
47. Raikow R.J. Appendicular myology and relationships of the New-World nine-primaried oscines (Aves: Passeriformes). Bull. Carnegie Muse. Nat. Hist. 7 (1978) 1-44
48. Rannala B., and Yang Z. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: a new method of phylogenetic inference. J. Mol. Evol. 43 (1996) 304-311
49. Remsen Jr. J.V. A new genus for the Yellow-shouldered Grosbeak. Orn. Monographs 48 (1997) 89-90
50. Remsen Jr. J.V. The "Coeribidae": a polyphyletic taxon that dramatizes historical over-emphasis on bill shape as a taxonomic character. J. Avian. Biol. 34 (2003) 321-323
51. Ridgely R.S., and Tudor G. The birds of South America (1989), University of Texas Press, Austin, TX
52. Ridgway, R., 1901. The birds of North and Middle America, part l. United States National Museum Bulletin No. 50.
53. Ridgway, R., 1902. The birds of North and Middle America, part ll. United States National Museum Bulletin No. 50.
54. Ronquist F., and Huelsenbeck J.P. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19 (2003) 1572-1574
55. Sclater, P.L., 1886. Catalogue of the Passeriformes or perching birds in the collection of the British Museum. vol. 11. British Museum (Nat. Hist.), London.
56. Shimodaira H. An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst. Biol. 51 (2002) 492-508
57. Shimodaira H., and Hasegawa M. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16 (1999) 1114-1116
58. Sibley C.G. A comparative study of the egg white proteins of passerine birds. Bull. Peabody Muse. Nat. Hist. 32 (1970) 1-131
59. Sibley C.G., and Ahlquist J.E. Phylogeny and Classification of Birds (1990), Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
60. Sibley C.G., and Monroe B.L. Distribution and taxonomy of the birds of the world (1990), Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
61. Smith A.B. Rooting molecular trees: problems and strategies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 51 (1994) 279-292
62. Sorenson M.D., Ast J.C., Dimcheff D.E., Yuri T., and Mindell D.P. Primers for a PCR-based approach to mitochondrial genome sequencing in birds and other vertebrates. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 12 (1999) 105-114
63. Stallcup, W.B., 1954. Myology and serology of the avian family Fringillidae, a taxonomic study, Univ. of Kansas Publ. Muse. Of Nat. Hist. 8, 157-211.
64. Steadman D.W., and McKitrick M.C. A Pliocene bunting from Chihuahua, Mexico. Condor 84 (1982) 240-241
65. Sushkin P.P. On the Fringillidae and allied groups. Bull. Brit. Orn. Club 45 (1924) 36-39
66. Swofford, D.L., 2002. PAUP* Version 4.0b10: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods), Sunderland, Massachusetts, Sinauer Associatiates.
67. Swofford D.L., Waddell P.J., Huelsenbeck J.P., Foster P.G., Lewis P.O., and Rogers J.S. Bias in phylogenetic estimation and its relevance to the choice between parsimony and likelihood methods. Syst. Biol. 50 (2001) 525-539
68. Tamplin J.W., Demastes J.W., and Remsen Jr. J.V. Biochemical and morphometric relationships among some members of the Cardinalinae. Wilson Bull. 105 (1993) 93-113
69. Tordoff, H.B., 1954. A systematic study of the avian family Fringillidae based on the structure of the skull, Misc. Publ. Muse. Zoo. Univ. Mich. No. 81.
70. Tordoff H.B. Relationships in the New World nine-primaried oscines. The Auk 71 (1954) 273-284
71. Wheeler W.C. Nucleic acid sequence phylogeny and random outgroups. Cladistics 6 (1990) 363-368
72. Yang Z. Among-site rate variation and its impact on phylogenetic analyses. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11 (1996) 367-372
73. Yuri T., and Mindell D.P. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Fringillidae, "New World nine- primaried oscines" (Aves: Passeriformes). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 23 (2002) 229-243