Impact of response delay and training on user performance with text-based and graphical user interfaces for engineering design

Research in Engineering Design

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 49-65

  Simpson, Timothy W ^a   Barron, Kimberly ^b   Rothrock, Ling ^b   Frecker, Mary ^a   Barton, Russell R ^a   Ligetti, Chris ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Design space visualization; Human computer interaction; Parameter design

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; ERROR ANALYSIS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; OPTIMIZATION; PROBLEM SOLVING;

DESIGN SPACE VISUALIZATION; ENGINEERING DESIGN; PARAMETER DESIGN; RESPONSE DELAY;

GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES;

EID: 36148938365     PISSN: 09349839     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00163-007-0033-y     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Card SK, Moran TP, Newell A (1983) The psychology of human-computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
2. Carignan CR, Akin DL (2001) Advanced operator interface design for complex space telerobots. Auton Robots 11(1):49-58
3. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
4. Dahl DW, Chattopadhyay A, Gorn GJ (2001) The importance of visualisation in concept design. Des Stud 22(1):5-26
5. Day PN, Holt PO, Russell GT (1999) Modeling the effects of delayed visual feedback in real-time operator control loops: a cognitive perspective. In: Proceedings of the XVIII European annual conference on human decision making and manual control, Group D Publications Ltd., Loughborough, UK, pp 70-79
6. Diehl E, Sterman JD (1995) Effects of feedback complexity on dynamic decision making. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 62(2):198-215
7. Dobson MW, Pengelly M, Sime J-A, Albaladejo SA, Garcia EV, Gonzales F, Maseda J (2001) Situated learning with co-operative agent simulations in team training. Comput Hum Behav 17(5-6):547-573
8. Eddy J, Lewis K (2002) Multidimensional design visualization in multiobjective optimization. In: Proceedings of the 9th AIAA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, Atlanta, GA, AIAA, AIAA-2002-5621
9. Eddy WF, Mockus A (1995) Dynamic visualization in modeling and optimization of ill-defined problems: case studies and generalizations. Technical Report, Department of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
10. Evans PT, Vance JM, Dark VJ (1999) Assessing the effectiveness of traditional and virtual reality interfaces in spherical mechanism design. ASME J Mech Des 121(4):507-514
11. Foley JD, Wallace JD (1974) The art of natural graphic man-machine conversation. Proc IEEE 4:462-471
12. Frecker M, Simpson TW, Goldberg JH, Barton RR, Holewinski B, Stump G (2001) Integrating design research into the classroom: experiments in two graduate courses. In: proceedings of the 2001 annual asee conference, Albuquerque, NM, ASEE
13. Goodman T, Spence R (1978) The effect of system response time on interactive computer-aided design. Comp Graph 12:100-104
14. Haftka R, Gürdal Z (1992) Elements of structural optimization, 3rd Revised and Expanded edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA
15. Hart SG, Staveland LE (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of experimental and theoretical research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N (eds) Human mental workload. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 139-183
16. Henderson T (2001) Latency and user behaviour on a multiplayer game server. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international COST264 workshop on networked group communication, Lecture Notes In Computer Science, vol 2233. Springer, New York, pp 1-13
17. Hirschi NW, Frey DD (2002) Cognition and complexity: an experiment on the effect of coupling in parameter design. Res Eng Des 13(3):123-131
18. Jay C, Hubbold R (2004) Does performance in the face of delayed sensory feedback change with practice?. In: Proceedings of the Eurohaptics conference, Springer, New York, pp 530-533
19. Jay C, Hubbold R (2006) Quantifying the effects of latency on sensory feedback in distributed virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the virtual images seminar 2006, College de France, Paris, pp 9-16
20. Jayaram S, Vance JM, Gadh R, Jayaram U, Srinivasan H (2001) Assessment of VR technology and its applications to engineering problems. ASME J Comput Inf Sci Eng 1(1):72-83
21. Jones CV (1994) Visualization and optimization. ORSA Journal of Computing 6(3):221-257
22. Jost K (1998) Chryslers clean sheet V6. Automot Eng Int 106(1):79-81
23. Kelsick J, Vance JM, Buhr L, Moller C (2004) Discrete event simulation implemented in a virtual environment. ASME J Mech Des 125(3):428-433
24. Kesavadas T, Sudhir A (2000) Computational steering in simulation of manufacturing systems. In: Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, San Francisco, CA, IEEE 3:2654-2658
25. Kihonge JN, Vance JM, Larochelle PM (2002) Spatial mechanism design in virtual reality with networking. ASME J Mech Des 124(3):435-440
26. Kirlik A, Walker N, Fisk AD, Nagel K (1996) Supporting perception in the service of dynamic decision making. Hum Factors 38(2):288-299
27. Kodiyalam S, Yang R-J, Gu L (2004) High performance computing and surrogate modeling for rapid visualization with multidisciplinary optimization. AIAA J 42(11):2347-2354
28. La Viola JJ Jr (2000) A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments. ACM SIGCHI Bull 32(1):47-56
29. Lewis K, Bloebaum CL (2000) The use of visualization to aid multidisciplinary decision making in design. In: Proceedings of the NSF grantees conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA
30. Ligetti C, Simpson TW (2005) Metamodel-driven design optimization using integrative graphical design interfaces: results from a job shop manufacturing simulation experiment. ASME J Comput Inf Sci Eng 5(1):8-17
31. Ligetti C, Simpson TW, Frecker M, Barton RR, Stump G (2003) Assessing the impact of graphical design interfaces on design efficiency and effectiveness. ASME J Comput Inf Sci Eng 3(2):144-154
32. Liu L, Watson B, Miyazaki M (1999) VR for the elderly: quantitative and qualitative differences in performance with a driving simulator. CyberPsychol Behav 2(6):567-576
33. MacKenzie IS, Ware C (1993) Lag as a determinate of human performance in interactive systems. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, New York, pp 488-493
34. Maxfield J, Juster NP, Dew PM, Taylor S, Fitchie M, Ion WJ, Zhao J, Thompson M (2000) Predicting product cosmetic quality using virtual environments. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences-Computers and Information in Engineering, Baltimore, MD, ASME, Paper No. DETC2000/CIE-14591
35. Messac A, Chen X (2000) Visualizing the optimization process in real-time using physical programming. Eng Optimiz 32(6):721-747
36. Mulder JD, van Liere R, van Wijk JJ (1998) Computational steering in the CAVE. Future Generation Comput Syst 14(3):199-207
37. National Research Council (1998) Visionary manufacturing challenges for 2020. Committee on Visionary manufacturing challenges, national research council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
38. Ng WY (1991) Generalized computer-aided design system: a multiobjective approach. Comput Aided Des 23(8):548-553
39. Osio IG, Amon CH (1996) An engineering design methodology with multistage bayesian surrogates and optimal sampling. Res Eng Des 8(4):189-206
40. Ottensmeyer MP, Hu J, Thompson JM, Ren J, Sheridan TB (2000) Investigations into performance of minimally invasive Telesurgery with Feedback time delays. Presence 9(4):369-382
41. Pantel L, Wolf LC (2002) Network issues for video and games: on the impact of delay on real-time multiplayer games. In: Proceedings of the I2th international workshop on network and operating systems support for digital audio and video, Miami, FL, ACM, pp 23-29
42. Pausch R, Crea T, Conway M (1992) A literature survey for virtual environments: military flight simulator visual systems and simulator sickness. Presence 1(3):344-363
43. Rothrock L, Barron K, Simpson TW, Frecker M, Barton RR, Ligetti C (2006) Applying the proximity compatibility and the control-display compatibility principles to engineering design interfaces. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf 16(1):61-81
44. Sabbagh K (1996) Twenty-first century jet: the making and marketing of the boeing 777. Scribner, New York, NY
45. Sheridan TB (1993) Space teleoperation through time delay: review and prognosis. IEEE Trans Rob Autom 9(5):592-606
46. Simpson TW, Iyer P, Barron K, Rothrock L, Frecker M, Barton RR, Meckesheimer M (2005) Metamodel-driven interfaces for engineering design: impact of delay and problem size on user performance. In: Proceedings of the 1st AIAA multidisciplinary design optimization specialist conference, Austin, TX, AIAA, AIAA-2005-2060
47. Simpson TW, Meckesheimer M (2004) Evaluation of a graphical design interface for design space visualization. In: Proceedings of the 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Palm Springs, CA, AIAA, AIAA-2004-1683
48. Simpson TW, Peplinski J, Koch PN, Allen JK (2001) Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: survey and recommendations. Eng Comput 17(2):129-150
49. Stump G, Yukish M, Simpson TW, Harris EN (2003) Design space visualization and its application to a design by shopping paradigm. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences-Design Automation Conference, Chicago, IL, ASME, Paper No. DETC2003/DAC-48785
50. Stump GM, Yukish M, Simpson TW, Bennett L (2002) Multidimensional visualization and its application to a design by shopping paradigm. In: Proceedings of the 9th AIAA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, Atlanta, GA, AIAA, AIAA-2002-5622
51. Sturman DJ, Zeltzer D, Pieper S (1989) Hands-on interaction with virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the 1989 ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on user interface software and technology, Williamsburg, VA, pp 19-24
52. Waern Y (1989) Cognitive aspects of computer supported tasks. Wiley, New York
53. Ware C, Balakrishnan R (1994) Reaching for objects in VR displays: lag and frame rate. ACM Trans Comput Hum Int 1(4):331-356
54. Watson B, Walker N, Hodges LF, Worden A (1997) Managing level of detail through peripheral degradation: effects on search performance in head-mounted display. ACM Trans Comput Hum Int 4:323-346
55. Wickman C, Soderberg R (2003) Increased concurrency between industrial and engineering design using CAT technology combined with virtual reality. Concurrent Eng Res Appl 11(1):7-15
56. Wierwille WW, Eggemeier FT (1993) Recommendations for mental workload measurement in a test and evaluation environment. Hum Factors 35(2):262-282
57. Winer EH, Bloebaum CL (2001) Visual design steering for optimization solution improvement. Struct Optimiz 22(3):219-229
58. Winer EH, Bloebaum CL (2002a) Development of visual design steering as an aid in large-scale multidisciplinary design optimization. Part I: method development. Struct Multidisciplinary Optimiz 23(6):412-424
59. Winer EH, Bloebaum CL (2002b) Development of visual design steering as an aid in large-scale multidisciplinary design optimization. Part II: method validation. Struct Multidisciplinary Optimiz 23(6):425-435