Visualizing the optimization process in real-time using physical programming

Engineering Optimization

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 721-747

  Messac, Achille ^a   Chen, Xuan ^a  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; REAL TIME SYSTEMS;

MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; PHYSICAL PROGRAMMING;

OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 0033658274     PISSN: 0305215X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03052150008941319     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Messac, A. (1996). Physical programming: effective optimization for computational design. AIAA Journal, 34(1), 149-158.
2. Messac, A., Gupta, S. and Akbulut, B. (1996). Linear physical programming: effective optimization for complex linear systems. Transactions on Operational Research, 8, 39-59.
3. Messac, A. and Hattis, P. (1996). Physical programming design optimization for high speed civil transport (HSCT). AIAA Journal of Aircraft, 33(2), 446-449.
4. Messac, A. (1996). From the dubious art of constructing objective functions to the application of physical programming. 6th AIAA/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Bellvue, WA, Paper No. AIAA-96-4123, pp. 1857-1867.
5. Messac, A. and Wilson, B. (1998). Physical programming for computational control. AIAA Journal, 36(2), 219-226.
6. Messac, A. (1998). Control-structure integrated design with closed-form design metrics using physical programming. AIAA Journal, 36(5), 855-864.
7. Messac, A. (1994). PhysPro: Software Package for Optimal Design. Optimal Systems, 18 Winchester Drive, Lexington MA, 02173.
8. Messac, A. (1998). Physical programming: intra-criteria and inter-criteria preference in design optimization. 39th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Long Beach CA, Paper No. 98-1970.
9. Steuer, R. E. (1986). Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation, and Application. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
10. Keiper, J. and Wickham-Jones, T. (1994). Designing tools for visualization and optimization. ORSA Journal on Computing, 6(3), 273-277.
11. Tarasiewicz, S., Léger, F. and Gille, J.-C. (1994). Dynamic optimization of complex mechanical system. Transactions of the Society for Computer Simulation, 10(4), 263-283.
12. Jones, C. V. (1994). Visualization and optimization. ORSA Journal on Computing, 6(3), 221-257.
13. Chipperfield, A. J. and Fleming, P. J. (1995). PARSIM: A parallel optimization tool. IEEE Control Systems, 15, 48-53.
14. Eddy, W. F. and Mockus, A. (1995). Dynamic Visualization in Modeling and Optimization of Ill-Defined Problems: Case Studies and Generalizations. Dept. of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University, Technical Report.
15. Androulakis, D. S. and Vrahatis, M. N. (1996). OPTAC: A Portable Software Package for Analyzing and Comparing Optimization Methods by Visualization. Journal of Computation and Applied Mathematics, 72, 41-62.
16. Herman, G. T. and Odhner, D. (1991). Visualizing optimization by multiple processors. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Visualization Blackboard, 11, 13-15.
17. Ng, W. Y. (1991). Generalized computer-aided design system: A multiobjective approach in computer-aided design. Computer-Aided Design, 23(8), 548-553.
18. Helig, M. H. (1992). El Cine del Futuro: The Cinema of the future. Presence, 1(3), 279-292.
19. Brown, J. R., Earnshow, R., Jern, M. and Vince, J. (1995). Visualization: Using Computer Graphics to Explore Data and Present Information. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, pp. 132-135.
20. Salas, A. O. and Townsend, J. C. (1998). Framework Requirements for MDO Application Development. AIAA-98-4740, 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, St. Louis, Missouri, pp. 261-271.
21. Hale, A. M. and Craig, J. I. (1996). Techniques for Integrating Computer Programs into Design Architectures. AIAA-96-4165, 6th AIAA/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Bellevue, WA, pp. 1594-1601.
22. Townsend, J. C., Weston, R. P. and Eidson, T. M., An Overview of the Framework for Interdisciplinary Design Optimization (FIDO) Project. NASA Langley Research Center, July, 1994, NASA TM 109058.
23. Engineous Software, Inc. (1998). iSIGHT Software. Morrisville, NC.
24. Hale, M. A., Craig, J. I., Mistree, F. and Schrage, D. P. (1996). DREAMS and IMAGE: A model and computer implementation for concurrent, life-cycle design of complex systems. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 4(2), 171-186.
25. Web address http://sass577.endo.sandia,gov/9234/sd_optim/Dakota.pdf
26. Bloebaum, C. L. and Winer (1997). N-dimensional design visualization via graph morphing for large scale optimization. Proceedings of the Second World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization (WCSMO-2), Zakopane, Poland, pp. 911-916.
27. Schilling, D. A., Revelle, C. and Cohon, J. (1983). An approach to the display and analysis of multiobjective problems. Socio-Ecor Plan Science, 17(2), 57-63.
28. Jones, C. V. (1996). Visualization and Optimization. Kluwer, Boston, 6-7, 323-340.
29. Tufte, E. R. (1983). The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT.
30. Sepulveda, A. E. and Jensen, H. (1996). Fuzzy optimization using approximation concepts. Paper No. AIAA-96-4182-CP, 6th AIAA/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Bellevue, WA, pp. 1743-1751.
31. Matlab (1997). The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA.
32. Durrett, H. J. (1987). Color and the Computer. Academic Press Inc., Boston, MA, pp. 49-57.