Applying the proximity compatibility and the control-display compatibility principles to engineering design interfaces

Human Factors and Ergonomics In Manufacturing

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 61-81

  Rothrock, Ling ^a   Barron, Kimberly ^a   Simpson, Timothy W ^a   Frecker, Mary ^a   Ligetti, Chris ^a   Barton, Russell R ^b  

^a The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN AIDS; EFFICIENCY; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

ENGINEERING DESIGN INTERFACES; PROXIMITY COMPATIBILITY PRINCIPLE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ERGONOMICS;

EID: 33645142384     PISSN: 10908471     EISSN: 15206564     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hfm.20039     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Barnett, B.J., & Wickens, C.D. (1988). Display proximity in multicue information integration: The benefit of boxes. Human Factors, 30(1), 15-24.
2. Barron, K., Simpson, T.W., Rothrock, L., Frecker, M., Barton, R.R., & Ligetti, C. (Submitted). Graphical user interfaces for engineering design: Impact of response delay and training on user performance. Research in Engineering Design.
3. Barton, R.R. (1998, December). Simulation metamodels. Paper presented at the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, Washington, DC.
4. Beard, D.V., & Walker, J.Q. (1990). Navigational techniques to improve the display of large two-dimensional spaces. Behaviour & Information Technology, 9(6), 451-466.
5. Bennett, K.B., Nagy, A.L., & Flach, J.M. (1997). Visual displays. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (pp. 659-696). New York: Wiley.
6. Bennett, K.B., Toms, M.L., & Woods, D.D. (1993). Emergent features and graphical elements: Designing more effective configural displays. Human Factors, 35(1), 71-97.
7. Bullinger, H.J., Kern, P., & Braun, M. (1997). Controls. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (pp. 697-728). New York: Wiley.
8. Carswell, C.M., & Wickens, C.D. (1990). The perceptual integration of graphical attributes: Configurality, stimulus homogeneity, and object integration. Perception and Psychophysics, 47, 157-168.
9. Casner, S.M. (1991). A task-analytic approach to the automated design of graphic presentations. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 10(2), 111-151.
10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Gerace, J., & Gallimore, J.J. (2001). Evaluation of visual display techniques for assembly sequence planning. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 11(3), 213-231.
12. Gibson, J.J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Goodman, T., & Spence, R. (1978). The effect of system response time on interactive computer-aided design. Computer Graphics, 12, 100-104.
14. Haftka, R., & Gürdal, Z. (1992). Elements of structural optimization (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
15. Hart, S.G., & Staveland, L.E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of experimental and theoretical research. In P.A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139-183). Amsterdam: North Holland.
16. Hirschi, N.W., & Frey, D.D. (2002). Cognition and complexity: An experiment on the effect of coupling in parameter design. Researh in Engineering Design, 13, 123-131.
17. Hutchins, E.L., Hollan, J.D., & Norman, D.A. (1986). Direct manipulation interfaces. In D.A. Norman & S.W. Draper (Eds.), User centered system design (pp. 87-124). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Jones, C.V. (1994). Visualization and optimization. ORSA Journal of Computing, 6(3), 221-257.
19. Karwowski, W. (2000). Symvatology: The science of an artifact-human compatibility. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 1(1), 76-91.
20. Ligetti, C., Simpson, T.W., Frecker, M., Barton, R.R., & Stump, G. (2003). Assessing the impact of graphical design interfaces on design efficiency and effectiveness. ASME Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 3(2), 144-154.
21. Messac, A., & Chen, X. (2000). Visualizing the optimization process in real-time using physical programming. Engineering Optimization, 32(6), 721-747.
22. National Research Council. (1998). Visionary manufacturing challenges for 2020 (Committee on Visionary Manufacturing Challenges Report). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
23. Norman, D.A. (1991). Cognitive artifacts. In J.M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface (pp. 17-38). New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Petre, M., & Green, T.R.G. (1992). Requirements of graphical notations for professional users: Electronics CAD systems as a case study. Le Travail Humain, 55(1), 47-70.
25. Pomerantz, J.R. (1986). Visual form perception: An overview. In H.C. Nusbaum & E.C. Schwab (Eds.), Pattern recognition by humans and machines (Vol. 2, pp. 1-30). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
26. Sanderson, P.M., Flach, J.M., Buttigieg, M.A., & Casey, E.J. (1989). Object displays do not always support better integrated task performance. Human Factors, 31(2), 183-198.
27. Simpson, T.W., Peplinski, J., Koch, P.N., & Allen, J.K. (2001). Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: Survey and recommendations. Engineering with Computers, 17 (2), 129-150.
28. Tullis, T.S. (1988). Screen design. In M.G. Helander (Ed.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 377-411). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
29. Vicente, K.J., & Rasmussen, J.R. (1992). Ecological interface design: Theoretical foundations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22(4), 589-606.
30. Wickens, C.D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins Inc.
31. Wickens, C.D., & Carswell, C.M. (1995). The proximity compatibility principle: Its psychological foundation and relevance to display design. Human Factors, 37(3), 473-494.
32. Wierwille, W.W., & Eggemeier, F.T. (1993). Recommendations for mental workload measurement in a test and evaluation environment. Human Factors, 35, 263-282.