Diabetes and the chronic care model: A review

Current Diabetes Reviews

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 219-225

  Warm, Eric J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Diabetes Care; Disease Management Application; HBA1c; HDL cholesterol; Insulin

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; HEMOGLOBIN A1C; INSULIN; INSULIN ASPART; INSULIN GLARGINE;

BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DIABETES EDUCATION; DIABETES MELLITUS; DRUG DOSE TITRATION; EDUCATION PROGRAM; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEMOGLOBIN BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNET; LONG TERM CARE; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SELF CARE; SMOKING CESSATION; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

CHRONIC DISEASE; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; DIABETES MELLITUS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; SELF CARE; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 36148932159     PISSN: 15733998     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/1573399076     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The diabetes control and complications trial research group. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 977-986.
2. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK prospective diabetes study (UKPDS) group. Lancet 1998; 352: 837-853.
3. Efficacy of atenolol and captopril in reducing risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 3UK prospective diabetes study group. BMJ 1998; 317: 713-720.
4. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 2635-2645.
5. Saydah SH, Fradkin J, Cowie CC. Poor control of risk factors for vascular disease among adults with previously diagnosed diabetes. JAMA 2004; 291: 335-342.
6. Saaddine JB, Cadwell B, Gregg EW, et al. Improvements in diabetes processes of care and intermediate outcomes: United States, 1988-200. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 465-474.
7. Briere R, ed. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
8. Garfield SA, Malozowski S, Chin MH, et al. Considerations for diabetes translational research in real-world settings. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 2670-2674.
9. Narayan KM, Benjamin E, Gregg EW, Norris SL, Engelgau MM. Diabetes translation research: Where are we and where do we want to be? Ann Intern Med 2004; 140: 958-963.
10. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q 1996; 74: 511-544.
11. Wagner EH. Chronic disease management: What will it take to improve care for chronic illness? Eff Clin Pract 1998; 1: 2-4.
12. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schaefer J, Bonomi A. Improving chronic illness care: Translating evidence into action. Health Aff (Millwood) 2001; 20: 64-78.
13. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: The chronic care model, part 2. JAMA 2002; 288: 1909-1914.
14. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA 2002; 288: 1775-1779.
15. American College of Physicians. The Advanced Medical Home: A Patient-Centered, Physician-Guided Model of Health Care. Available at: http://www.acponline.org/hpp/adv_med.pdf Accessed 5/5, 2007.
16. Epping-Jordan JE, Pruitt SD, Bengoa R, Wagner EH. Improving the quality of health care for chronic conditions. Qual Saf Health Care 2004; 13: 299-305.
17. Martin M, Larsen BA, Shea L, Hutchins D. State Diabetes Prevention and Control Program Participation in the Health Disparities Collaborative: Evaluating the First 5 Years. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/ issues/2007/jan/06_0027.htm. Accessed 5/5, 2007.
18. US Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/. Accessed 5/5, 2007.
19. Association of American Medical Colleges. Academic Chronic Care Collaborative. Available at: http://www.aamc.org/patientcare/iicc/ initiatives.htm. Accessed 05/12, 2007.
20. Improving Chronic Illness Care. Available at: http://www.improving-chroniccare.org/. Accessed 5/5, 2007.
21. Adams SG, Smith PK, Allan PF, Anzueto A, Pugh JA, Cornell JE. Systematic review of the chronic care model in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prevention and management. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 551-561.
22. Clement S. Diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Care 1995; 18: 1204-1214.
23. Grant RW, Pirraglia PA, Meigs JB, Singer DE. Trends in complexity of diabetes care in the United States from 1991 to 20. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 1134-1139.
24. Glasgow RE, Davis CL, Funnell MM, Beck A. Implementing practical interventions to support chronic illness self-management. It Comm J Qual Saf 2003; 29: 563-574.
25. Norris SL, Engelgau MM, Narayan KM. Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 561-587.
26. Nelson KM, McFarland L, Reiber G. Factors influencing disease selfmanagement among veterans with diabetes and poor glycemic control. J Gen Intern Med 2007; 22:442-447.
27. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010: Understanding and improving health. 2000.
28. Von Korff M, Gruman J, Schaefer J, Curry SJ, Wagner EH. Collaborative management of chronic illness. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127: 1097-1102.
29. Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, Schmid CH, Engelgau MM. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 1159-1171.
30. Siminerio LM, Piatt GA, Emerson S, et al. Deploying the chronic care model to implement and sustain diabetes self-management training programs. Diabetes Educ 2006; 32: 253-260.
31. Sadur CN, Moline N, Costa M, et al. Diabetes management in a health maintenance organization. efficacy of care management using cluster visits. Diabetes Care 1999; 22: 2011-2017.
32. Taplin S, Galvin MS, Payne T, Coole D, Wagner E. Putting population-based care into practice: Real option or rhetoric? J Am Board Fam Pract 1998; 11: 116-126.
33. Grumbach K, Bodenheimer T. Can health care teams improve primary care practice? JAMA 2004; 291: 1246-1251.
34. Siminerio LM, Piatt G, Zgibor JC. Implementing the chronic care model for improvements in diabetes care and education in a rural primary care practice. Diabetes Educ 2005; 31: 225-234.
35. Siminerio LM, Zgibor JC, Solano FX. Implementing the chronic care model for improvements in diabetes practice and outcomes in primary care: The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center experience. Clin Diabetes 2004; 22: 54-58.
36. Shojania KG, Ranji SR, McDonald KM, et al. Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: A meta-regression analysis. JAMA 2006; 296: 427-440.
37. The California Medi-Cal Type 2 Diabetes Study Group. Closing the gap: Effect of diabetes case management on glycemic control among low-income ethnic minority populations: The California Medi-Cal type 2 diabetes study. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 95-103.
38. Norris SL, Nichols PJ, Caspersen CJ, et al. The effectiveness of disease and case management for people with diabetes. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2002; 22: 15-38.
39. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Delivery System Design: Use Planned Visits in Individual and Group Settings. Available at: http://www.ihi.org/IHI/Topics/ChronicConditions/AllConditions/Changes/ IndividualChanges/Use+PlannedVisitsinIndividualandGroupSettings.htm. Accessed 05/12, 2007.
40. Clancy DE, Cope DW, Magruder KM, Huang P, Salter KH, Fields AW. Evaluating group visits in an uninsured or inadequately insured patient population with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2003; 29: 292-302.
41. Clancy DE, Huang P, Okonofua E, Yeager D, Magruder KM. Group visits:. Promoting adherence to diabetes guidelines. J Gen Intern Med 2007; 22: 620-624.
42. Wagner EH, Grothaus LC, Sandhu N, et al. Chronic care clinics for diabetes in primary care: A system-wide randomized trial. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 695-700.
43. Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA. Closing the gap between research and practice; An overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group. BMJ 1998 317: 465-468.
44. Meigs JB, Cagliero E, Dubey A, et al. A controlled trial of web-based diabetes disease management: The MGH diabetes primary care improvement project. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 750-757.
45. Cho JH, Chang SA, Kwon HS, et al. Long-term effect of the internet-based glucose monitoring system on HBA1c reduction and glucose stability: A 30-month follow-up study for diabetes management with a ubiquitous medical care system. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 2625-2631.
46. Rutscher A, Salzsieder E, Fischer U. KADIS: Model-aided education in type I diabetes. Karlsburg Diabetes Management System. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1994; 41: 205-215.
47. Augstein P, Vogt L, Kohnert KD, Freyse EJ, Heinke P, Safzsieder E. Outpatient assessment of KADIS(R)-based decision support. Diabetes Care 2007.
48. Mooradian AD, Bernbaum M, Albert SG. Narrative review: A rational approach to starting insulin therapy. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145: 125-134.
49. Metzger J, ed. Using Computerized Registries in Chronic Disease Care. First Consulting Group; 2004,
50. Better Diabetes Care: Framework for Making Systems Changes. Available at: http://betterdiabetescare.nih.gov/FRAMEWORKinfoessential.htm. Accessed 05/06, 2007.
51. Casalino L, Gillies RR, Shortell SM, et al. External incentives, information technology, and organized processes to improve health care quality for patients with chronic diseases. JAMA 2003; 289: 434-441.
52. Montori VM, Dinneen SF, Gorman CA, et al. The impact of planned care and a diabetes electronic management system on community-based diabetes care: The Mayo Health System Diabetes Translation Project. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 1952-1957.
53. Grant RW, Cagliero E, Sullivan CM, et al. A controlled trial of population management: Diabetes mellitus: Putting evidence into practice (DM-PEP). Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 2299-2305.
54. Bataklen PB, Davidoff F. What is "quality improvement" and how can it transform healthcare? Qual Saf Health Care 2007; 16: 2-3.
55. Langley GL, Nolan KM, Nolan TW, et al. The Improvement Guide: A Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1996.
56. Cretine S, Shortell SM, Keeler EB. An evaluation of collaborative interventions to improve chronic illness care, framework and study design. Eval Rev 2004; 28: 28-51.
57. Fisher EB, Brownson CA, O'Toole ML, et al. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation diabetes initiative: Demonstration projects emphasizing self-management. Diabetes Educ 2007; 33: 83-4, 86-8, 91-2, passim.
58. Carlson BA, Neal D, Magwood G, Jenkins C, King MG, Hossler CL. A community-based participatory health information needs assessment to help eliminate diabetes information disparities. Health Promot Pract 2006; 7: 213S-22S.
59. Galasso P, Amend A, Melkus GD, Nelson GT. Barriers to medical nutrition therapy in black women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Educ 2005; 31: 719-725.
60. Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ, Barrera M, Jr, Strycker LA. The chronic illness resources survey: Cross-validation and sensitivity to intervention. Health Educ Res 2005; 20: 402-409.
61. Mills PD, Weeks WB. Characteristics of successful quality improvement teams: Lessons from five collaborative projects in the VHA. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 2004; 30: 152-162.
62. Tsai AC, Morton SC, Mangione CM, Keeler EB. A meta-analysis of interventions to improve care for chronic illnesses. Am J Manag Care 2005; 11: 478-488.
63. Davidoff F, Batalden P. Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: The beginning of a consensus project. Qual Saf Health Care 2005; 14: 319-325.
64. Minkman M, Ahaus K, Huijsman R. Performance improvement based on integrated quality management models: What evidence do we have? A systematic literature review. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19: 90-104.
65. Walsbe K. Understanding what works - and why - in quality improvement: The need for theory-driven evaluation. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19: 57-59.
66. TRIAD Study Group. The Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study: A multicenter study of diabetes in managed care. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 386-389.
67. Mangione CM, Gerzoff RB, Williamson DF, et al. The association between quality of care and the intensity of diabetes disease management programs. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145: 107-116.
68. Chin MH, Cook S, Drum ML, et al. Improving diabetes care in Midwest community health centers with the health disparities collaborative. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 2-8.
69. Kerr EA, Gerzoff RB, Krein SL, et al. Diabetes care quality in the Veterans Affairs health care system and commercial managed care: The TRIAD study. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 272-281.
70. Landon BE, Hicks LS, O'Malley AJ, et al. Improving the management of chronic disease at community health centers. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 921-934.
71. Vargas RB, Mangione CM, Asch S, et al. Can a chronic care model collaborative reduce heart disease risk in patients with diabetes? J Gen Intern Med 2007; 22: 215-222.
72. Sanmuganathan PS, Ghahramani P, Jackson PR, Wallis EJ, Ramsay LE. Aspirin for primary prevention of coronary heart disease: Safety and absolute benefit related to Coronary risk derived from meta-analysis of randomised trials. Heart 2001; 85: 265-271.
73. Hurlen M, Abdelnoor M, Smith P, Erikssen J, Arnesen H. Warfarin, aspirin, or both after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 969-974.
74. Nutting PA, Dickinson WP, Dickinson LM, et al. Use of chronic care model elements is associated with higher-quality care for diabetes. Ann Fam Med 2007; 5: 44-20.
75. Piatt GA, Orchard TJ, Emerson S, et al. Translating the chronic care model into thc'cofnmunity: Results from a randomized controlled trial of a multi-faceted diabetes care intervention. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 811-817.
76. Grant, RW, Meigs-JB. Overcoming barriers to evidence-bascd diabetes care. Curr Diabet Rev 2006: 261-269.
77. Glasgow RE, Whitesides H, Nelson CC King DK. Use of the patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC) with diabetic patients: Relationship to patient characterisfics, receipt of care, and self-management. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 2655-2661.
78. Arnold MS, Butler PM, Anderson RM, Funnell MM, Feste C. Guidelines for facilitating a patient empowerment program. Diabetes Educ 1995; 21: 308-312.