Task- and location-switching effects on visual attention

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 66, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1303-1317

  Juola, James F ^a,b,c   Botella, Juan ^b   Palacios, Antonio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c Institute for Perception Research Eindhoven   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BLINKING; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; VISION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BLINKING; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 17944379989     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195000     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. ALLPORT, A., & HSIEH, S. (2001). Task-switching: Using RSVP methods to study an experimenter-cued shift of set. In K. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention (pp. 36-64). New York: Oxford University Press.
2. ARNELL, K. M. (2001). Cross-modal interactions in dual-task paradigms. In K. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention (pp. 141-177). New York: Oxford University Press.
3. ARRINGTON, C. M., ALTMANN, E. M., & CARR, T. H. (2003). Tasks of a feather flock together: Similarity effects in task switching. Memory & Cognition, 31, 781-789.
4. ARRINGTON, C. M., & LOGAN, G. D. (2004). The cost of a voluntary task switch. Psychological Science, 15, 610-615.
5. BOTELLA, J., BARRIOPEDRO, M. I., & SUERO, M. (2001). A model of the formation of illusory conjunctions in the time domain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 1452-1467.
6. BREITMEYER, B. (1984). Visual masking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. BRIAND, K. A., & KLEIN, R. M. (1987). Is Posner's "beam" the same as Treisman's "glue"? On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 228-241.
8. BROADBENT, D. E., & BROADBENT, M. H. P. (1987). From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 105-113.
9. CHUN, M. M., & POTTER, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 109-127.
10. CHUN, M. M., & POTTER, M. C. (2001). The attentional blink and task switching within and between modalities. In K. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention (pp. 20-35). New York: Oxford University Press.
11. ENNS, J. T., VISSER, T. A. W., KAWAHARA, J.-I., & DI LOLLO, V. (2001). Visual masking and task switching in the attentional blink. In K. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention (pp. 65-81). New York: Oxford University Press.
12. HOLMGREN, J. (1968). Visual search with imperfect recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 4, 247-252.
13. ISAAK, M. I., SHAPIRO, K. L., & MARTIN, J. (1999). The attentional blink reflects retrieval competition among multiple RSVP items: Tests of the interference model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1774-1792.
14. JOLICŒUR, P., DELL'ACQUA, R., & CREBOLDER, J. M. (2001). The attentional blink bottleneck. In K. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention (pp. 82-99). New York: Oxford University Press.
15. JUOLA, J. F., DUVURU, P., & PETERSON, M. S. (2000). Priming effects in attentional gating. Memory & Cognition, 28, 224-235.
16. JUOLA, J. F., KOSHINO, H., & WARNER, C. B. (1995). Tradeoffs between attentional effects of spatial cues and abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 333-342.
17. KAWAHARA, J.-I., ZUVIC, S. M., ENNS, J. T., & DI LOLLO, V. (2003). Task switching mediates the attentional blink even without backward masking. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 339-351.
18. KRISTJÁNSSON, Á., & NAKAYAMA, K. (2002). The attentional blink in space and time. Vision Research, 42, 2039-2050.
19. LIU, G., HEALEY, C. G., & ENNS, J. T. (2003). Target detection and localization in visual search: A dual systems perspective. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 678-694.
20. MEIRAN, N. (2000). Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research, 63, 234-249.
21. MONSELL, S., SUMNER, P., & WATERS, H. (2003). Task-set reconfiguration with predictable and unpredictable task switches. Memory & Cognition, 31, 327-342.
22. MÜLLER, H. J., & RABBITT, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 315-330.
23. NIEUWENHUIS, S., & MONSELL, S. (2002). Residual costs in task switching: Testing the failure-to-engage hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 86-92.
24. NORMAN, D. A., & SHALLICE, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation (Vol. 4, pp. 1-18). New York: Plenum.
25. PETERSON, M. S., & JUOLA, J. F. (2000). Evidence for distinct attentional bottlenecks in attention switching and attentional blink tasks. Journal of General Psychology, 127, 6-26.
26. POSNER, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
27. POSNER, M. I., & COHEN, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. POTTER, M. C., CHUN, M. M., BANKS, B. S., & MUCKENHOUPT, M. (1998). Two attentional deficits in serial target search: The visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 979-992.
29. RAYMOND, J. E., SHAPIRO, K. L., & ARNELL, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 849-860.
30. ROGERS, R. D., & MONSELL, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
31. RUTHRUFF, E., & PASHLER, H. E. (2001). Perceptual and central interference in dual-task performance. In K. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention (pp. 100-123). New York: Oxford University Press.
32. SEIFFERT, A. E., & DI LOLLO, V. (1997). Low-level masking in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1061-1073.
33. SHAPIRO, K. L., & RAYMOND, J. E. (1994). Temporal allocation of visual attention: Inhibition or interference? In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 151-188). San Diego: Academic Press.
34. SHIH, S.-I (2000). Recall of two visual targets embedded in RSVP streams of distractors depends on their temporal and spatial relationship. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1348-1355.
35. SPERLING, G., & WEICHSELGARTNER, E. (1995). Episodic theory of the dynamics of spatial attention. Psychological Review, 102, 503-532.
36. TURVEY, M. T. (1973). On peripheral and central processes in vision: Inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli. Psychological Review, 80, 1-52.
37. VISSER, T. A., & BISCHOF, W. F. (2000, November). T1-difficulty and the attentional blink: We interrupt this processing to bring you an account. Paper presented at the 41st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.
38. VISSER, T. A., BISCHOF, W. F., & DI LOLLO, V. (1999). Attentional switching in spatial and nonspatial domains: Evidence from the attentional blink. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 458-469.
39. WEICHSELGARTNER, E., & SPERLING, G. (1987). Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. Science, 238, 778-780.
40. WOLFE, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.